Which monitor manufacturer is better? How to choose a monitor for your computer. What parameters are the most important? Seat Dell P2416D - Available

Liquid crystal (LCD) monitors have already replaced the old devices with a CRT tube everywhere. However, LCD monitors are improving over time, but sometimes old models with CCFL backlight and new LED monitors with a modern matrix are still on store shelves.

Ratings of the best monitors of 2017

For those who do not want to go into technical details, we have prepared lists of monitors that make sense to pay attention to first. These lists are compiled based on user surveys, as the most objective criterion. But we recommend that you still read the article and make your choice consciously, based on the characteristics of the device you need, forming your own opinion.

Tech_type: Monitors
search: S22D300NY
Samsung S22D300NY

Different types of backlight

In short, the way an LCD monitor works is that “moving crystals” open and close colorful filters that need to be illuminated. Previously, fluorescent lamps (CCFL) were responsible for this, but today the vast majority of models use light-emitting diode (LED) backlighting.

To be honest, this criterion can hardly be taken into account when choosing a monitor today, since old CCFL monitors no longer make up more than 1% of those available for sale, and even then, you can probably only buy them in exotic online stores. Although it should be noted that there is no difference in picture quality between LED and CCFL monitors. The latter only consume large quantity They also have more energy and screen thickness.

Matrix type is the most important criterion when choosing a monitor

There are three main types of matrices on the market today: TN, IPS and VA. The first type, TN, is the most widespread, has quite significant disadvantages, but is inexpensive. The weaknesses of TN matrices include low contrast, poor color rendering and small viewing angles. But there are also advantages - short response time and low cost.

A less common, but also quite popular type of matrix is ​​IPS. The main difference between monitors with an IPS matrix is ​​the highest quality. IPS outperforms TN in all respects: IPS has better color reproduction, contrast, and wider viewing angles. Previously, the situation was worse only with response time: in early models it was significantly longer than in TN matrices. However, this problem was also solved, albeit at the cost of increasing the cost.

In general, it should be noted that IPS matrices are the most expensive of all those on the market. Also, when choosing, keep in mind that the IPS themselves also have a significant number various types. Thus, S-IPS and AS-IPS today can no longer be found not only in stores, but also in the offices of budgetary institutions. They began production in 1998; they were expensive, but at the same time they had a long response time and low contrast.

H-IPS matrices appeared in 2006, E-IPS in 2009, and P-IPS in 2010. These are already really high quality models. Thus, monitors with an E-IPS matrix, for example, differ slightly in price from devices with a TN matrix, but outperform the latter in quality, which is why such monitors are also on sale today.

PLS is another type of IPS, which is a proprietary development of Samsung in 2010. AH-IPS is also a modern modification of IPS from the same company. If you are confused about these varieties, then just buy a monitor latest models with IPS matrix. They are unlikely to install matrices of old types.

If you want to choose the “average” option with a good, but not too expensive matrix, then best choice may become a monitor with a VA matrix. More often on store shelves you can find a more advanced variety - MVA, as well as PVA. They are completely identical, the only difference is that the first type is developed by Fujitsu, and the second by Samsung.

There are also newer and more advanced VA matrices - S-PVA, S-MVA, P-MVA, A-MVA. In terms of characteristics and cost, they have almost caught up with expensive IPS matrices. If you need a budget option VA matrices, then the C-PVA type is probably suitable, its quality is superior to TN, and the cost is similar to the latter.

Rating of the best monitors with ISP matrix

If you understand the advantages of such a monitor, then perhaps you will find the list of models with an IPS matrix, compiled based on user opinions, useful

Display size

Monitors with a diagonal, for example, 19 and 21 inches are almost identical in price, the question of choice in this case disappears. But remember that the monitor is usually right in front of the user's eyes, so reading, typing and surfing the Internet while looking at a huge screen will be uncomfortable. This is not a TV, where its size plays a decisive role. A screen with a diagonal of 21-23 inches is considered optimal for a monitor.

Screen resolution

The higher the monitor screen resolution, the better. This is HD 720p (1366 x 768), as well as Full HD 1080p (1920 x 1080). However, it is important to remember the following. Firstly, it is undesirable to change the resolution specified in the design of the LCD monitor, as this distorts the image. Secondly, the higher the resolution, the smaller the elements on your desktop will be. Therefore, there is no point in buying a 19-inch monitor with Full HD resolution, since working on it will be very tiring for the eyes.

Aspect Ratio

The last thing to note is the aspect ratio of the display. Today, widescreen screens with a 16:9 ratio are almost the norm. This is very convenient for watching movies, but for Internet surfing, and even more so for working in text editors, this ratio only gets in the way. It is better to work with texts and graphics on “square” monitors with an aspect ratio of 5:4, 4:3, but it is extremely rare to find them on sale anymore. Now these are rather professional models for architects and designers.

The best monitors you can buy in 2018.

In 2018, using the best monitor you can afford is almost mandatory, even if you don't use best computer in the world. No matter what you use your computer for, you will do it through the lens of your monitor. Whether you spin the tape social network, play the best computer games or even write like us, there is no reason why you should subject your eyes to excess stress and suffer from headaches, which, unfortunately, go hand in hand when you are not using the best monitor.

Nobody wants to suffer headaches from a mediocre monitor, so maybe it's time to head to the store and pick up one of the best monitors of 2018. The good news is that you don't have to worry about spending a fortune on a new monitor—there are plenty of great products available for everyone. Sure, you can spend $60,000 on some fancy curved widescreen monitor, but most of the best monitors on the market are aimed at users who don't need these high-end features. And that's why we've put together this rating, to help you find the best monitor for your needs - don't pay for something you don't really need.

Whether you're looking for a mid-range monitor or one of the best, we've covered them all. We've put together a list of the best monitors you can buy in 2018, each of which has been reviewed by our editorial team. So, without further ado, let's dive into the top ten.

BenQPD3200U

TOP for (some) gamers and digital professionals.

Screen diagonal: 32 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 3840 x 2160 | Brightness: 350 cd/m2 | Response time: 4 ms | Viewing angle: 178 / 178 | Contrast: 1000:1 | Color support: sRGB 100% | Weight: 8.5 kg.

• pros: 4K resolution | Large screen;
• Minuses: Design may seem boring | Some features;

Now that computers are equipped with encoding technologies that can output images at a given resolution, 4K monitors are increasingly in demand. This explains why BenQ is adding the PD3200U, a massive 32-inch monitor with Ultra HD resolution, to the series. Designed for working professionals, the company accidentally designed a monitor that gamers would also enjoy if it fit on their desks. Again, given its comparatively slow 4ms response time, the PD3200U is best suited for creative professionals. For example, 3D designers will appreciate the inclusion of CAD/CAM mode, while everyone else will enjoy fail-safe color rendering and Rec. 709.

AOC Agon AG352UCG

A curved ultra-wide monitor that also offers G- Sync.

Screen diagonal: 35 inches | Aspect Ratio: 21:9 | Permission: 3440 x 1440 pixels | Brightness: 300 cd/m2 | Response time: 4 ms | Viewing angle: 172 / 178 | Contrast: 2000:1 | Color support: sRGB 100% | Weight: 11.8 kg.

• pros: Curved screen 21:9 | G-Sync compatible;
• Minuses: Really big | Expensive;

AOC's Agon AG352UCG is proof that ultra-wide monitors don't have to be limited by resolution or advanced functionality. In fact, this is a 21:9 IPS panel that boasts a stunning 3440 x 1440 pixel resolution with G-Sync support. That's right, when paired with an Nvidia graphics card, the monitor uses G-Sync to eliminate screen resync without increasing the voltage on your computer. What's more, you can expect better responsiveness from the AOC Agon than its closest competitors, promising lower latency in games like Overwatch or Lawbreakers, which are known for their fast-paced action. The only downside is that the AOC Agon is quite bulky. Weighing in at 11.8 kilograms, it will require you to make sure your desk can support its weight.

Acer Predator X34

The best gaming monitor with character.

Screen diagonal: 34 inches | Aspect Ratio: 21:9 | Permission: 3440 x 1440 pixels | Brightness: 300 cd/m2 | Response time: 4ms G2G | Viewing angle: 178 / 178 | Contrast: 100 million:1 | Color support: sRGB 100% | Weight: 9.9 kg.

• pros: Aggressive design | Excellent color accuracy;
• Minuses: Limited port selection | Lack of dynamics;

When the classic 16:9 aspect ratio doesn't cut it for your needs, there's nothing better than a 21:9 cinematic monitor. While it's not ideal for streaming TV series or playing one of the many games that don't support the 21:9 ratio, the Acer Predator X34 is an example of what an ultra-wide monitor should be. Featuring an eye-catching aluminum bezel and a polygonal stand that resembles bird's claws, this massive 34-inch monitor is a real eye-catcher. What's more, armed with Nvidia's G-Sync frame smoothing technology, you won't have to worry about turning on Vsync and putting extra strain on your graphics card. The Acer Predator X34 will meet almost all your needs. If you look past the speakers and the lack of some ports, it's about as immersive as other gaming monitors.

Dell UltraSharp UP3218K

Back to the Future.

Screen diagonal: 32 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 7680 x 4320 pixels | Brightness: 400 cd/m2 | Response time: 6 ms | Viewing angle: N/A | Contrast: 1300:1 | Color support: sRGB 100% | Weight: 8.5 kg.

• pros: Stunning 8K resolution | Great design;
• Minuses: Very expensive | Limited 8K content;

From time to time we come across technologies that are significantly ahead of their time, leaving us dumbfounded by the possibilities. The Dell UltraSharp UP3218K is the most recent example from 2018. There are only a few monitors in the world that can achieve the flawless beauty of the UP3218K. It's not just 8K resolution. Dell has gone a long way to make sure the new monitor's build quality and color reproduction are incredibly high. However, the extremely high price of the monitor and its exclusive focus on digital professionals limit the consumer. If you want to edit photos and videos on a monitor that will provide maximum precision, the Dell UltraSharp UP3218K may be the best monitor for you.

ASUS MG248Q

Reasonably priced for 144Hz and adaptive sync.

Screen diagonal: 23.6 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 1920 x 1080 pixels | Brightness: 350 cd/m2 | Response time: 1 ms | Viewing angle: 170 / 160 | Contrast: 100000000:1 | Color support: sRGB 100%, Adobe RGB 72% | Weight: 17 kg.

• pros: Refresh rate 144Hz | Call time 1 ms;
• Minuses: TN panel | Adaptive Sync for AMD, Intel only;

If your PC can't handle 1440p or 4K games, the ASUS MG248Q is the best monitor for you. Although the ASUS MG248Q is limited to a 1080p nematic (TN) panel instead of IPS, it makes up for any shortcomings with excellent response time and adaptive sync. The latter reduces frame tearing if you're using AMD graphics cards, a clear demonstration that the MG248Q is suitable for a budget gaming build. On the other hand, even Nvidia fans will be able to enjoy the 144Hz refresh rate. But without a suitable graphics card, you might be better off saving on the G-Sync-equivalent ASUS ROG Swift PG248Q.

Acer S277HK

Endless beauty.

Screen diagonal: 27 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 3840 x 2160 pixels | Brightness: 300 cd/m2 | Response time: 4 ms | Viewing angle: 178 / 178 | Contrast: 100000000:1 | Color support: sRGB 100% | Weight: 11.9 kg.

• pros: Off-center design | Update frequency;
• Minuses: No USB ports | Height is not adjustable;

Normally you'd have to break an arm and a leg to afford 4K, but that's not the case with Acer's S277HK. In terms of price, the monitor is a promising investment. With a contrast ratio of 1 million:1, a color gamut of 1.07 billion and a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, the Acer S277HK offers best picture among the monitors that we saw. Unfortunately, due to the design of the monitor, there is no way to mount it on a wall, and the height of the monitor is not adjustable. But, if high pixel density, reasonable price, and no lag are your priorities, this is your best monitor.

Alienware 25

The omnipresent solution is against resynchronization.

Screen diagonal: 24.5 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 1920 x 1080 pixels | Brightness: 400 cd/m2 | Response time: 1 ms | Viewing angle: 170 / 160 | Contrast: 1000:1 | Color support: sRGB 119% | Weight: 11.7 kg.

• pros: Great design | High refresh rate;
• Minuses: Dear | Only 1080p;

Depending on the width of your budget, it could easily leave you broke classic style Alienware, but the 25-inch Dell gaming monitor leaves no chance for frame resynchronization. This is because if you are using an AMD or Nvidia graphics card, there is a configuration designed specifically for you. Taking some of the GPU load that is otherwise spent on vertical sync (VSync), software technology that similarly attempts to hide tearing is also backed up by the Alienware 25's 120Hz clock rate. In this case, you can expect the screen image to reach 120 frames per second as long as your graphics card can handle that playback speed, provided it doesn't become too weak point your processor.

BenQ Zowie XL2540

The best monitor for professional gamers.

Screen diagonal: 24 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 1920 x 1080 pixels | Brightness: 400 cd/m2 | Response time: 1 ms | Viewing angle: 170 / 160 | Contrast: 1000:1 | Color support: NTSC 72% | Weight: 7.5 kg.

• Pros: High refresh rates | Easy setup;
• Minuses: Dear | Limited audience of PRO gamers;

You may not believe it at first glance, but the BenQ Zowie XL2540 is the best gaming monitor, and it shows in every inch of it. While it may not look like it on the outside, it does a great job, sacrificing dazzling backlight effects for stunning 240Hz refresh rate and snappy 1ms response time. The gaming monitor does not offer G-Sync or FreeSync as this monitor assumes that you are using a powerful gaming PC that can eliminate frame drops. Instead, the monitor keeps things simple by giving you a variety of visual presets, an "S-Switch" control unit to control those presets, and a couple of customizable lighting modes.

LG 34UC79G-B

A smart choice for an ultra-wide monitor with FreeSync.

Screen diagonal: 34 inches | Aspect Ratio: 21:9 | Permission: 2560 x 1080 pixels | Brightness: 250 cd/m2 | Response time: 10.3 ms | Viewing angle: 178 / 178 | Contrast: 1000:1 | Color support: sRGB 92.1% | Weight: 8.6 kg.

• pros: Curved screen 21:9 | AMD FreeSync;
• Minuses: Resolution less than competitors | Game Mode;

If you play games with AMD or Intel graphics but want to enjoy an ultra-wide screen without spending a fortune, this is the monitor you should consider. The 34-inch LG 34UC79G-B features AMD FreeSync to eliminate frame drops in the 21:9 aspect ratio best suited for gaming and cinema. Although the resolution is lower than most other widescreen monitors on the market, there's no doubt that the LG 34UC79G-B still offers crisp images with stunning color accuracy. Plus, you can change the height, which is something some of the even more expensive 4K monitors on the market can't do.

ASUS ROG Swift PG248Q

Faster than you can say G- Sync".

Screen diagonal: 24 inches | Aspect Ratio: 16:9 | Permission: 1920 x 1080 pixels | Brightness: 350 cd/m2 | Update frequency: 180 Hz | Response time: 1 ms | Viewing angle: 170 / 160 | Contrast: 1000:1 | Color support: Adobe RGB 74% | Weight: 9.5 kg.

• Pros: Cheapest G-Sync monitor on the market | Frequency 180 Hz;
• Minuses: Only two entrances | 24-inch only;

If you need frame rate more than graphics or resolution, this is the best monitor for you. With its stunning 180Hz refresh rate capabilities, the ASUS ROG Swift PG248Q easily crosses the gaming gold standard of 60fps - that's assuming you've equipped a PC that can handle the workload. And while you're unlikely to like what Forza Horizon 3 will do to your computer at 180 frames and Ultra graphics settings, considering high speed survey, a high refresh rate is more than welcome in fast and dynamic games that are not necessarily resource-rich. Plus, this is one of the most affordable G-Sync monitors on the market, helping you prevent tearing.

DELL P2418D is a strong mid-ranger with good characteristics for its price. For their convenience, the user can adjust the position of the screen in height and tilt. The front panel has minimal frames. It looks simply incredible considering the 2.5K resolution (Quad HD) and the average diagonal of 23.8 inches. The image on the screen is detailed and has a rich color gamut. The screen is connected to the PC via HDMI and Display Port interfaces.
Display refresh rate – 60 Hz, IPS matrix. Because of this, the monitor can be considered as a solution for watching movies and working in graphic editors. Competitive online gaming enthusiasts must decide if 60fps is enough for them. Otherwise, the monitor is suitable for everything. The IPS matrix allows the display not to lose quality even at extreme angles.

Review

It’s funny to write that everything is perfect, but there’s nothing to complain about. Yes, there are micro highlights, but this is just regular edge ice. The photos look amazing and the colors don't fade. Let's say the autumn pine forest does not turn into mush. (I shoot with a full-frame DSLR and process the photo)
This is the very case when the thing works 100%. I got what I wanted. A small note - the monitor is not professional, and you can’t advise professionals themselves - they’re on their own, but for normal use it’s just an excellent choice.

pros

• Nice colors
• Build quality
• The stand is adjustable in all directions
• Thin frames
• Large viewing angles
• IPS matrix

Minuses

• Non-switchable standby indicator

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 2560×1440 (16:9)
• brightness 300 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 5 ms
• USB hub

The DELL U2412M monitor can be described as “office-like” after the first acquaintance with it. Classic design no frills, E-IPS matrix, Full HD resolution (1920x1200), as well as the presence of “outdated” interfaces for connecting to a computer: VGA, DVI. Compared to them, the presence of Display Port and the absence of HDMI is very strange. The screen refresh rate is not surprising - the same 60 Hz. Interestingly, the monitor can be rotated as the user wishes - 180 degrees around its axis, and also adjusted in height. The DELL U2412M monitor is a good option for installing on a low-performance PC in the office. It will be convenient to process information, watch videos and create content. It’s also suitable for games, but lovers of excellent graphics and smooth images should turn their attention to other monitors from DELL.

Review

There are a lot of different settings for color scheme and brightness, adjusting the position of the monitor above the table in different planes (height, tilt, rotation, ability to hang on the wall). In general, a technique for centuries, I recommend it.

pros

• Nice colors
• Reliability
• IPS matrix
• The picture is customizable to taste
• Tilt and height adjustment + rotate to portrait mode

Minuses

• USB connectors are disabled when switching to “energy saving” mode (“sleep”)

• 24″ LCD monitor
• screen matrix type TFT E-IPS
• resolution 1920×1200 (16:10)
• brightness 300 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 8 ms
• USB hub

After the first acquaintance with the Philips 243V7QDSB, the average user will not believe that the monitor belongs to the segment of budget home devices. Screen with minimal bezels, stylish design, IPS matrix and incredibly clear image. The user has the opportunity to connect a computer to the Philips 243V7QDSB using a DVI, VGA or HDMI connector. It is convenient to work at the monitor for a long time - prolonged contact with the display does not cause pain in the eyes. Otherwise, this is a classic solution for home or office use with a nice design.

Review

I bought it for home as a TV monitor - I am 100% satisfied!!! Of the settings, I only reduced the brightness to 60 (the default was 100%) All tests in Aida64 were a success!
White as white, black as black, viewing angles are large, no backlighting
questions (highlights can be seen at a brightness of less than 10%, and then only in monochrome), there is low blue. Frameless, the body is well assembled, the leg is not low and durable, and it is light. I'm connected via DVI - no complaints about the picture.

pros

• Good picture
• Build quality
• Good factory settings
• Viewing Angles
• Reliable stand
• Vertical connection of connectors

Minuses

• No height adjustment possible

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• connection: VGA, DVI, HDMI
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 5 ms

The AOC G2460PF monitor should not be overlooked just because you have not heard the name of this brand before. The consumer clearly will not regret choosing this model: the screen is suitable for games, as it has a refresh rate of 144 Hz, movies and work, thanks to Full HD resolution. The G2460PF case is made in red and black, which looks quite stylish. The frames around the display, although not minimal, still do not cause discomfort. The monitor will work great in combination with AMD video cards, as it supports AMD FreeSync technology. Gamers will certainly appreciate the 1ms response speed. From additional features: built-in speakers, two USB ports, ability to adjust tilt, height. AOC G2460PF connects to the system unit via interfaces: HDMI, VGA, DVI and VGA.

Review

In terms of price-quality ratio, the monitor is ideal; it gives 110% worth of money. The 144 Hz frequency is enabled in the video card settings, I had to dig around and didn’t find it right away. The brightness is too high, you need to immediately reduce it, otherwise your eyes will bleed out. The downside is that it’s rustic, cheap plastic, but for that kind of money it’s somehow strange to want sophistication.

pros

• Clear picture
• Convenient stand
• 144 Hz
• Appearance
• Response time

Minuses

• Not the best viewing angles

• screen matrix type TFT TN
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• Max. refresh rate 146 Hz
• flicker-free backlight
• brightness 350 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 1 ms
• FreeSync support
• built-in speakers
• USB hub

The DELL U2417H monitor primarily attracts consumers with its frameless screen, design, and reliable stand with the ability to adjust the height and tilt. Of course, it uses an IPS matrix with Full HD resolution, which is optimal with a diagonal of 23.8 inches. The screen refresh rate is only 60Hz, which may not be enough for a demanding gamer. If you don't get involved in eSports, you can still enjoy the games. But it’s best to watch movies and work with content on such a screen. Connection to a video card or motherboard is possible thanks to the presence of modern interfaces: Display Port, mini Display Port, HDMI. The monitor has a built-in USB hub.

Review

As a universal work or home monitor, it’s great (I don’t know about gaming). I think you can buy a 5 thousand cheaper monitor with the same picture - but here you pay for the build quality, real framelessness and an awesome stand (better than a professional NEC). For those who care, this is an excellent choice.

pros

• Nice stand
• Thin frames
• Large viewing angles
• Good picture
• Color rendition
• Multiple USB 3.0 ports

Minuses

• Power button backlight does not turn off in standby mode

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 6 ms
• USB hub

LG 24UD58 is a monitor for people who love the most detailed images. The manufacturer equipped the device with a 23.8-inch diagonal screen and Ultra HD resolution – 3840x 2160. This solution is suitable for those who like to watch new movies in the highest quality, as well as for people who work with graphics. This solution uses an IPS matrix with an image refresh rate of 60 Hz. At the same time, the presence of FreeSync technology allows you to do game process as smooth and comfortable as possible. Gamers will appreciate a new frontier in graphics that previously seemed unattainable. True, to realize the full potential of the LG 24UD58, you will need a powerful PC hardware base. On the back of the monitor there are connectors for the following interfaces: HMDI, DP. There is no way to adjust the screen position to suit the user's needs.

Review

An excellent monitor with excellent picture quality, both for working with documents and for games. Perhaps with a 24" diagonal and UHD, it is the most optimal in terms of price and quality at the moment.
I love the rich, bright picture, but warm color I was not satisfied with the preset. Thanks to the numerous color settings available, I set it up just the way I wanted.

pros

• IPS matrix
• Bright colors
• Lots of picture settings
• Clear picture
• Resolution 3840x2160

Minuses

• The stand is not adjustable

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 3840×2160 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: HDMI, DisplayPort
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• response time 5 ms

The 23.8-inch BenQ GW2470H monitor is the optimal solution for viewing and working with multimedia content. Paying attention to the price tag of the device, you can call it a “gift” - nice design, Full HD resolution, 60 Hz screen refresh rate and AMVA+ matrix. Not IPS, but the viewing angles are excellent - the monitor is well suited for watching movies in a small group. For games, it is advisable to find a solution of a higher class. When limited budget- BenQ GW2470H may become good decision. You can connect several devices to the monitor simultaneously thanks to the presence of two HDMI and one VGA ports.

Review

I am very pleased with the purchase. The picture quality is almost the same as on an APS matrix. For this money you are unlikely to find a better option; other brands are more expensive. I advise you to take it.

pros

• Large viewing angles
• Good picture
• Color rendition
• Convenient stand
• Matte screen
• Convenient menu and mode control

Minuses

• No height adjustment

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT A-MVA
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: VGA, HDMI
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 3000:1
• response time 4 ms

The monitor from DELL differs from similar solutions primarily in its design - thin, thoughtful in detail and ergonomic. The main thing is the almost complete absence of frames around the screen. This attracts the consumer. In all other respects, the DELL U2414H cannot be called an unusual monitor. High-quality Full HD display with IPS matrix, 60 Hz, the presence of all standard interfaces for connecting the device to a computer - HDMI, Display Port and mini HDMI. The owner of the monitor has the ability to change the location of the screen: set the tilt angle, height. Important detail: the monitor has a built-in USB hub.

Review

I liked it appearance, IPS matrix, I bought it, after the old monitor the picture is beyond praise, it feels like the old monitor was showing through a thick film. Pure White color, does not yellow, clarity, brightness, juiciness are at their best, the eyes do not get tired.
The old TN made my eyes burn after a day of work.
The picture was very bright, so I reduced the brightness to 25.

pros

• Fairly high image quality
• Functionality
• Good color rendering
• Many ports
• Thin frame
• Switchable power LED backlight
• Nice appearance

Minuses

• Inconvenient location of the USB for quick access

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: HDMI, MHL, DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 8 ms
• USB hub

The most common monitor from BenQ, which uses a TN matrix. The screen resolution is standard for a 24-inch diagonal - 1920x1080. This combination allows you to get almost the best image in the budget segment. The undoubted advantage of the device is its discreet, sophisticated design. The GL2460 is ergonomic and the screen is supported on a secure, adjustable stand. All interfaces are located on the rear panel - DVI and VGA. To use it with modern video cards, you will need an adapter for a modern connector - HDMI or DP. For old people systems will do perfect.

Review

A workhorse, inexpensive, but of high quality and for a long time. The look is quite presentable, not pretentious, strict, black and quite solid. There is no need to demand too much from a monitor in this price segment. He fully justifies his claim. I've been playing heavy games on this monica for many years, using office programs, no complaints.

pros

• Good viewing angles
• Color rendition
• Good resolution
• Reliability

Minuses

• Not the most convenient control buttons

• 24″ LCD monitor
• screen matrix type TFT TN
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: VGA, DVI
• brightness 250 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 2 ms

This monitor from BenQ is a compromise solution. So, the screen diagonal is 24 inches, Quad HD resolution, AHVA matrix. In combination, this allows you to display an image in good quality, which remains unchanged even when viewed from a large angle. The BL2420PT has its own features: built-in speakers, a reliable stand and the ability to adjust the screen position. The tilt changes, the display rotates around its axis. The monitor has a stylish, minimalistic design. Supports all existing interfaces: HDMI, VGA, DP and DVI. There was even room for a 3.5 mm jack on the case.

Review

Well, in general, you can find fault with anything and everything, but I am 146% satisfied with the monitor - it copes with the main task - it shows an amazing picture, it can turn into a portrait.
Add. I don’t use functions in the form of columns.
I had to change the video card - the old 7870 did not handle 2.5k resolution

pros

• Matte screen
• Adjustable stand
• High pixel density
• Comfortable in using
• Good picture and color rendition
• Eco mode

Minuses

• No HDMI cable included

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 2560×1440 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: VGA, DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort
• brightness 300 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 5 ms
• built-in speakers
• USB hub

LG 24GM79G is a monitor that will certainly interest gamers. It has everything to show its superiority in tactical shooters and e-sports projects. The aggressive design speaks for the device - this is definitely a gaming solution. Screen refresh rate 144 Hz, TN matrix and Full HD. This is the case when a relatively low resolution plays into the hands - even on average-performing systems you can set the maximum graphics settings to approximately 144 FPS. In your free time from games, you can watch videos and do a little work. The monitor contains all the necessary interfaces: DP, two HDMI, USB. Switching between connected devices occurs almost instantly. The user can adjust the screen height and tilt angle.

Review

The monitor is great for its TN matrix. It’s simply ideal for games, an ideal preset for any game. Gamma, black calibration, RGB, convenient sights. Perfect. In general, you can read IPS quality. For the money this is the best option.

pros

• Nice design
• Convenient mode switching buttons
• DP cable included
• 144 hz
• Normal picture out of the box
• Color rendition
• Brightness and Contrast

Minuses

• When turned, the stand rotates with the base

• 24″ LCD gaming monitor
• screen matrix type TFT TN
• resolution 1920×1080 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: HDMI, DisplayPort
• brightness 350 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 1 ms
• FreeSync support
• USB hub

DELL P2415Q is not a gaming monitor. Firstly, to run any modern project 4K resolution will require a high-performance system, and secondly, 60 Hz. However, the monitor has something to brag about. All sorts of display position adjustments, detailed images, IPS matrix and stylish design. Interfaces for connecting a PC, laptop or console are located on the back of the DELL P2415Q. There are HDMI, mini DP, and two full Display Port connectors. The monitor looks like the best buy for watching movies, working, or using it with a console.

Review

I work with photography, which is why I bought this monitor. I wanted to get a picture with quality no worse than on the iPad. Received. The image is great. Together with this monitor I use Acer with the usual Full HD resolution - the difference is like heaven and earth. In short, I recommend it!

pros

• High image clarity
• Laconic design
• Convenient stand
• Good color rendering
• Height adjustment

Minuses

• The menu is not very friendly

• LCD monitor with a diagonal of 23.8″
• screen matrix type TFT IPS
• resolution 3840×2160 (16:9)
• flicker-free backlight
• connection: HDMI, MHL, DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort
• brightness 300 cd/m2
• contrast ratio 1000:1
• response time 6 ms
• USB hub

AOC I2475PXQU

A consumer unfamiliar with the AOC brand will carefully bypass the I2475PXQU model. In vain, because for its modest price the monitor offers some of the best technical characteristics: 60 Hz image refresh rate, IPS matrix and Full HD resolution. For some, the presence of all modern and slightly outdated interfaces will be an advantage. The monitor has many more connectors than similar devices. All of them are located on the side panels. Thus, we can note several USB ports 2.0, 3.0. There is even 3.5 mm for using headphones and a microphone. Of course, the AOC I2475PXQU has integrated speakers.

BenQ BL2411PT

Don't expect anything fancy from the BenQ BL2411PT monitor. He copes 100% with the tasks assigned to him, period. This is a standard solution for home or office use. This means use as a multimedia station - watching videos, photos, working on the Internet, with text documents, processing graphics. BenQ BL2411PT is equipped with a 23.8-inch screen with a resolution of 1920x1080 (Full HD standard). At the same time, the image refresh rate is only 60 Hz, which is not suitable for e-sports shooters. However, you can use the monitor for games – in single projects you can evaluate the image quality. Connection to a computer or console is made via DVI, DP and VGA interfaces. Some users will have to think about purchasing an HDMI to DP adapter.

ASUS VG248QE

ASUS is a leading brand in the world of computer gaming. The monitor with model number VG248QE once again proves this fact. The main differences from competitors are the TN matrix and the screen refresh rate of 144 Hz. An ideal solution for eSports disciplines. The rest of the specifications are standard – Full HD resolution, screen exactly 24 inches. The monitor's response time is 1 ms, which is a decent indicator for a gaming solution. Features include 3D support, built-in speakers, and the ability to connect headphones. ASUS VG248QE connects to a computer, laptop or console via HDMI, DVI and Display Port cables. The user can independently set the position of the screen by adjusting the height, tilt angle, and turning it into “portrait mode”.

Best monitors for gaming | Introduction

Detailed Specifications and monitor reviews- this, of course, is great, but only if you have time to study them. However, all a user needs is the best monitor for the money available. Those who don't have time to look through numerous test results, those who don't feel confident enough in choosing the best monitor, have absolutely nothing to fear - the editors are constantly updating this article, which tells about choosing the best monitor for every budget and taste. At the same time, you will find here links to the most current detailed reviews if you want to clarify any details.

Best monitors for gaming | Additional materials

For a better understanding of the monitor testing methodology, we recommend that you read the article. Also, a few articles on monitor calibration and image science would be helpful:

If you're new to monitors, the articles listed above will help you understand our testing methodology and its impact on image quality.

Best monitors for gaming | Latest updates

Place Dell S2719DGF monitor took in the category "Best 144 Hz" ViewSonic Elite XG240R, place Asus ROG Strix XG35VQ in the category "Best Curved" took ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C.

Best monitors for gaming | Pivot table

Why you should buy: good quality, adequate pricing policy, a sufficient set of capabilities for an undemanding user who wants to forget the solutions based on TN+Film as a “bad dream”.

What can stop: appearance, stand with tilt angle adjustment only.

Alternative: Dell P2217H, more advanced from all points of view, if you are ready to add another 5 thousand rubles and say goodbye to “bezel-less”.

Why you should buy: quality materials, good build, deep black color and minimal Glow effect.

What can stop: reluctance to be like everyone else, uneven brightness, clearly visible on a dark gray field, one degree of freedom at the stand (tilt angle).

Why you should buy: ideal companion to the latest Macbook Pro, USB hub and speaker system on board, single cable connection, relatively good factory setting, color gamut at DCI-P3 level, nice design.

What can stop: only for MacOS, price, increased load on the system, lack of high-quality anti-reflective coating.

Why you should buy: when you don’t want to overpay for another sticker on the case, but still get the same matrix.

What can stop: exclusively distrust of the brand and expectation of high precision of factory settings.

Alternative: there are more than enough of them for any wallet: a new product from BenQ BL2480 with an Eye Care vision protection complex, an ambient light sensor and a simple stand; the most “frameless” and Dell S2418HN (version with speaker system included) and many other designer models from ASUS, Acer, AOC, HP and Philips.

Why you should buy: look for a decent minimum among 23.5-24-inch *VA Full HD standard and are lost by the number of similar offers on the market from a variety of brands.

What can stop: the presence of glossy parts, the response speed on dark transitions leaves much to be desired (a completely standard problem for all *VAs of this class).

Alternative: the latest generation Iiyama ProLite XB2483HSU-B3 with an ergonomic stand and the absence of glossy parts for ~10,000 rubles.

Why you should buy: an absolute novelty on the market, the monitor has everything you need (a TN+Film display really needs an ergonomic stand), high-quality and practical materials, and a reasonable price.

What can stop: visible crystalline effect, old matrices in a new case do not attract you, and 144 Hz is no longer taken seriously - an increase in speed is required!

Alternative: much nicer than ASUS MG248QR for 20,000 rubles, 240-Hz Alienware AW2518HF with AMD FreeSync for 28,000 rubles and any 240-Hz model with G-Sync from AOC, Acer, ASUS and Dell Alienware from 31,000 to 40,000 rubles - a fundamental difference only in design, a defect can occur in any of them, because the matrices used are identical, and the quality of the factory settings even on the most expensive of them is so-so.

Why you should buy: you get everything possible in this segment for minimal money. There is no point in overpaying for something else.

What can stop: large stand, play in fasteners and hinges, oversaturated colors due to the use of backlight based on “quantum dots”, you shouldn’t have hopes of getting speed at the level of TN+Film solutions - these are two big differences, despite the same scan frequency.

Why you should buy: many years ago you had to choose among 3-4 similar models, but in 2017-2018 everything fell into place - Dell, period.

What can stop: leapfrog with installed matrices (AHVA, IPS, PLS - but, in fact, it should not matter to you - they all belong to IPS-type); Only people completely far from the IT industry have not heard about it (a joke, but with a greater degree of truth).

Alternative: As an interesting “frameless” option, we should note the new HP Z24nf, the old NEC MultiSync EA245WMi with a built-in ambient light sensor and, alas, poor configuration, and slightly more expensive models from EIZO FlexScan EV2455 / with similar capabilities, but much better factory calibration and extremely wide range of brightness adjustment.

Why you should buy: 24 inches with a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels is your ideal, but without an extended color gamut, life is not life, and you are willing to pay more than 40,000 rubles for a monitor.

What can stop: Apart from the expanded CO, it has no other really useful functions, and even 5 years have passed since its release. Maybe it's time to retire?

Alternative: NEC with wide capabilities, but a normal color gamut close to the sRGB standard - MultiSync P242W - is the case when it is classified in the professional segment solely because of its color reproduction capabilities.

Why you should buy: They haven’t done anything more interesting in this segment yet, and don’t take the old PA242W for the sake of minimal savings.

What can stop: after many years they have not reduced the thickness of the case, although it is at least half empty.

Alternative: the rarely seen Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 at a nice price of 54,000-60,000 rubles, or the top and latest Eizo ColorEdge CG2420 launched on the market for 85,000 rubles with a built-in colorimetric sensor for automatic recalibration and a bunch of other useful technologies.

Why you should buy: I really want to test the 21:9 format in action, but I’m not ready to allocate more than 10,000 rubles for this.

What can stop: a ton of gloss, narrow screen, poor diagonal-resolution-format ratio.

A well-known and time-tested monitor that has been on the market for a relatively long time. Nothing superfluous, a crude frame design, an ergonomic stand, a presence sensor. But it is extremely affordable and the quality is higher than many in its class.

Why you should buy: time-tested quality.

What can stop: outdated frame design.

Alternative: Among the “frameless” and almost equally affordable, we can highlight the one we tested and the Dell P2418D. For maximum framelessness on all four sides, go to the Dell UltraSharp U2518D for 22,000 rubles.

Why you should buy: a different approach to quality than the more affordable AOC AGON series, wide availability.

What can stop: however, no one has canceled the defective matrix - it can happen to any monitor; Do you think that such a resolution is “too much for such a diagonal.”

Alternative: we take out another 8,000 rubles from the stash and get The best decision in the class with a G-Sync module on board - Dell S2417DG. Yes, it's that simple.

The Dell UP2516D monitor is a very rare “little animal” on consumer desks and one of its kind among those available in the Russian Federation. We did not have any serious complaints about it, and the noted features of the operation of various technologies and functions were preserved even in the newest models of the American company.

Why you should buy: you need an expanded color gamut and for some reason you decided that you need a 25-inch monitor with a WQHD resolution, and not the more usual 27-inch resolution.

What can stop: Possible need to use a zoom system - this depends on your visual acuity and distance from the screen.

Why you should buy: The most affordable 4K display is small by modern diagonal standards from a well-known manufacturer.

What can stop: appearance, large frames, glossy body elements, the persistent need to use the Windows OS scaling system.

Alternative: Buying a display of this kind in itself is a big gamble, but if you suddenly decide to almost double your budget and need an ergonomic stand coupled with high-quality case materials, then the only adequate option is the old Dell P2415Q.

Why you should buy: exclusivity of the solution, complete “stuffing” and high image clarity.

What can stop: You can’t do without a scaling system; 24 inches for that kind of money is very expensive...

Why you should buy: excellent price-quality ratio.

What can stop: they wanted real HDR, and here it is - just three letters in the name, a mode invented by engineers with increased contrast, and the ability to activate software image processing using Windows OS (not available in all versions).

Alternative: it could easily be the ergonomic Iiyama ProLite XB2783HSU-3 for exactly the same money, but without such a heap of technologies or with a curved SVA matrix with a slightly expanded color gamut (it seems that the same “quantum dots” that the manufacturer decided to leave for technical characteristics more expensive models).

Why you should buy: because there is no point in overpaying for something else among the available 144 Hz solutions with FreeSync.

What can stop: You are hearing about this series of monitors (XF) for the first time and you don’t want to buy a “pig in a poke” (however, in vain - it’s not scary).

Alternative: Those looking to get 240Hz should take a look at the most affordable monitor with an ergonomic stand from LG 27GK750F. Here you will also find an advanced illumination system for the external space, convenient controls and high-quality materials. The adaptive synchronization system is still the same - FreeSync. With G-Sync there are only expensive Acer Predator XB models from 33,000 to 45,000 rubles, depending on the maximum vertical scan frequency (144 and Hz).

Why you should buy: try to find a better one for a similar amount (or better yet, cheaper).

What can stop: unfulfilled expectations for the speed of the matrix after a preliminary assessment in the store upon purchase - this is not TN+Film or even IPS with a similar vertical scan frequency, a deep stand.

The Dell U2917W monitor is an evolution of the once popular U2913W model, which affected not only the external data of the new product, but also its technical base- in particular, a system for compensating for illumination unevenness. Those who care about appearance, quality of materials and ergonomics of the stand will choose this model. Yes, it is noticeably more expensive than available offers from LG, but sometimes such an overpayment is worth it.

Why you should buy: This is a decision from the category - I bought it and calmed down. All that's left to do is enjoy the best representative class.

What can stop: price, flat (not curved) screen.

Why you should buy: a super advantageous offer, which turned out to be significantly cheaper than its predecessor with almost identical characteristics.

What can stop: The stand only has tilt angle adjustment, you won’t get a big speed advantage when moving from 60 to 75 Hz.

The monitor combines a high-quality matrix with good factory settings, a nice design, a set of the most necessary functions and capabilities and, most importantly, a low price for devices of this kind. Iiyama probably didn’t make such big bets on its XUB2792QSU, but it turned out the way it did - in terms of price-quality ratio at the beginning of 2018, it has no real competitors, but it has everything you need (even in excess) for most consumers.

Why you should buy: there is little point in overpaying (if you are a rationalist) for something else - you will still get the same IPS-type panel or its equivalent with minimal differences.

What can stop: design, personal distrust of the brand and doubts about quality (but definitely not for us).

Alternative: however, there are more than enough quality options in this class. It is worth considering such frame models as AOC Q2775PQU and BenQ PD2700Q, as well as “frameless” AOC Q2781PQ, AOC Q2790PQU/BT and Samsung S27H850QFI. Each of these monitors can be purchased for an amount of about 21,500-23,500 rubles. If you need maximum “framelessness” and vision protection, then for 25,000-26,000 rubles the best option is BenQ EW2770QZ. Moving into the 30,000+ ruble segment in hopes of getting higher quality is not the best option, especially when it comes to monitors with identical/maximally similar matrices. Perhaps the only exception is the time-tested Eizo FlexScan EV2736WFS - this is a different level, though for completely different money.

Why you should buy: when price-quality is paramount, and your video card is from AMD.

What can stop: distrust of the brand, unsuccessful monitor menu, lack of a quick-release platform for attaching the stand to the case.

Alternative: if you need NVIDIA G-Sync support, then the best option, which we have additionally tested, will definitely not let you down, but you will have to pay extra.

Why you should buy: lack of other similar options at the time of writing this material.

What can stop: appearance, a large stand, a slightly expanded color gamut, as well as a pixel response speed, which, as has already been confirmed, is lower than that of IPS representatives.

Having seen dozens of different 27-inch WQHD IPS displays, I concluded that the best of them in terms of price-quality ratio is a representative of the Acer Predator camp. It costs less, the number of defects is lower, and the factory settings are close to ideal (though only in terms of gamma curves). Its competitors from AOC and Viewsonic are the most problematic in the entire family, and therefore the choice becomes obvious.

Why you should buy: because experience shows that this is the optimal gaming monitor based on a high-speed IPS matrix.

What can stop: appearance, control system, poorly set white point from the factory (depends on the batch, but generally the monitor turns pretty yellow at any brightness).

A monitor with a standard color gamut, “a million” customization options, a working system for compensating for backlight unevenness, and an internal high-bit LUT open for hardware calibration. Viewsonic engineers were unable to reach the level of more serious players on the market, but the price is completely different.

Why you should buy: This is a unique offer, the like of which no other monitor manufacturer can offer you.

What can stop: poor factory settings, a very confusing menu and an unclear relationship between various operating parameters - it was difficult even for the author of this material to figure it out (and it was not possible to do it completely).

The best option with a “cart” of possibilities for those who have not yet saved up for solutions from NEC and Eizo, but have already begun to feel the need for an expanded color gamut. By the way, most consumers should opt for just such a solution and not overpay two or three times - only a few will see the difference and only a part of them will use at least half of the functions presented in models in the highest price range.

Why you should buy: where else can you find such a set of technologies for a similar amount?

What can stop: a lot of free money that can be used to purchase an even more expensive and high-quality solution.

Models with a diagonal of 27-29 inches, UHD/4K standard (3840 x 2160), IPS-type

The 27-inch class with 4K resolution is quite controversial due to one global problem: this is not enough to work in native resolution without activating the scaling system (at least by 150%), and it, in turn, is still seriously flawed.

Contender: BenQ BL2711U

A model that could claim to be semi-professional if not for the standard color gamut. The rest, as they say, is “complete mincemeat.”

Why you should buy: strictly, efficiently, practically and for reasonable money.

What can stop: framework design and the standard need to use the problematic Windows OS scaling system.

Alternative: if you don’t need an ergonomic stand, then among the most rigorous and affordable options, you should give your choice to the Lenovo ThinkVision P27

Contender: Acer Predator XB271HKbmiprz

When we are talking about games in a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, then, with a high degree of probability, the user has (and if not, then must have) one of the top video cards from NVIDIA installed. In this case, the monitor would benefit from support for NVIDIA G-Sync technology, and the presented monitor is the only one on the market in the 27-inch 4K IPS segment.

Why you should buy: Without a top-end video card from NVIDIA, you won’t be able to play comfortably in 4K resolution, and where the “green” stuff is, a G-Sync module won’t hurt to increase smoothness and reduce the number of frame tearing.

What can stop: understanding that your system is not ready for games in 4K resolution at high graphics settings; mandatory use of the Windows OS scaling system.

A new BenQ monitor from the well-known and proven professional series, with all the capabilities inherent in this class and high-quality factory settings. It's just starting to become available, but if you're a discerning user who prefers to work in an expanded color space, it's definitely worth waiting and seeing for yourself.

Why you should buy: Models of this level rarely appear in this class - do not miss your chance, unless, of course, you are sure that an extended central heating center is a real necessity and not just a whim.

What can stop: perhaps only the price and the need to use the Windows OS scaling system.

Alternative: You can save money with the less thoughtful Viewsonic VP2785-4K, or splurge on the first and so far only (as of March 2018) true HDR monitor Dell UP2718Q. It's not perfect, there are significant problems with access to the built-in LUT, and there are some unpleasant features of the backlight system, but that's why it's the first of its kind.

Why you should buy: You have a modern computer with Windows installed and you really want to see the clearest and crystal clear picture from the screen.

What can stop: glass working surface with minimal anti-glare properties, a serious load on the system, the need to use the problematic Windows scaling system on an ongoing basis.

Why you should buy: everything in one bottle, easy connection, maximum quality image.

What can stop: price (although it never stops Apple fans), lack of hardware control of RGB and other screen parameters, high load on the system, semi-gloss working surface of the display (though with a good anti-glare layer). If you are using a laptop or computer with Windows system- We urge you to refuse to purchase this model.