Intelligence services of the White movement. Counterintelligence. 1918-1922 Kirmel Nikolai Sergeevich
2. Suppression of reconnaissance and subversive actions of special services and organizations of Soviet Russia and foreign states
After October revolution 1917 territory split Russian Empire became an arena of struggle for power, spheres of influence, Natural resources and markets for both internal and external forces seeking to dismember the country. Therefore, increased attention to the White Guard state formations that fought “for one and indivisible” was shown not only by Soviet Russia and Germany, but also by limitrophe countries and even allies - England, the USA, France and Japan. Virtually all powers that participated in one form or another in the Russian Civil War were engaged in espionage against the White regimes.
When creating its security agencies, the command of the Volunteer Army was guided by the “Temporary Regulations on the Counterintelligence Service” of 1917. The first paragraph of this document defined the task of counterintelligence, which consisted “... exclusively of detecting and examining enemy spies...”. Spies were people who “secretly or under false pretenses collected or tried to collect information of a military nature with the intention of communicating it to the enemy,” and espionage meant “collection of all kinds of information.”
In November 1918, the head of the special department, based on the experience of the first months Civil War, in a report to the chief of the General Staff, explained that “the concepts of “spy” and “enemy” cannot be understood as a subject or agent of a foreign power with which we are at war. Anyone who, through his activities, seeks to harm the unity and power of the state should be considered an enemy.” Colonel V.V. Kreiter rightly believed that in order to “successfully combat enemy reconnaissance, it is necessary to monitor his work, go parallel with him and prevent his attacks.”
However, in the initial period of their existence, Denikin’s counterintelligence agencies, which were not yet strong enough, were forced to devote their forces and resources, first of all, to the fight against Bolshevik underground organizations. “The range of responsibilities of counterintelligence, defined by the “Regulations on the Counterintelligence Service,” does not at all meet the requirements of the time, since the fight against enemy military espionage is now a secondary task,” says the report of the chief quartermaster of the headquarters of the commander of the troops of the South-Western Territory. “The civil war, being a political struggle, cannot leave counterintelligence aside from politics.” One can only partially agree with this argument. Documents show that the Bolshevik underground directed its efforts not only to organizing armed uprisings and propaganda activities, but also penetrated army headquarters to obtain intelligence data. At the same time, the work of foreign intelligence agencies was not limited to “pure” intelligence, but was also aimed at weakening the potential of the Denikin regime: supporting opposition forces, propaganda, decomposition military units, sabotage, etc.
Speaking about the priorities in the activities of Denikin’s counterintelligence at the initial stage of the Civil War, it should be borne in mind that the intelligence services of the main enemy - Soviet Russia - were in the process of formation. Only on November 5, 1918, a central military intelligence agency was created - the Registration Directorate of the Field Headquarters of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic (RVSR). Lack of financial resources and qualified personnel, the Register did not immediately manage to create intelligence networks in the White Guard rear and organize the collection of information necessary for the command.
The organs of the Cheka in 1918 did not have specialized intelligence structures; their main efforts were concentrated on the “fight against counter-revolution” within the country and suppressing pockets of anti-Soviet protests. The main task of the Special Department of the Cheka, created on December 19, 1918, was the fight against espionage and counter-revolution in institutions and units of the Red Army. Only at the end of 1919 did local special departments take up foreign counterintelligence.
During their formation, the Red special services did not conduct active work in the White Guard rear. This circumstance caused some calm among the officials of Denikin’s counterintelligence, which concentrated all its efforts on the fight against Bolshevik underground organizations. Thus, the head of the special department of the General Staff of the Military Directorate, Colonel P.G. Arkhangelsky in 1919 wrote about the removal of counterintelligence “from fulfilling its immediate responsibility - monitoring enemy intelligence officers and agents.”
The peak of the confrontation between Soviet intelligence and White Guard counterintelligence in the South of Russia occurred in 1919, during the period of intense military operations.
Analysis of the documents allows us to judge that the Red intelligence services acted in two ways: on the one hand, they sent lone intelligence officers to the White Guard headquarters to collect information of a military nature, and on the other hand, they carried out a massive deployment of agents to carry out reconnaissance and subversive activities behind enemy lines, often in interaction with underground organizations. It was the latter who, for the most part, became objects of development by Denikin’s counterintelligence.
The White Guard security agencies established that in the North Caucasus three Soviet military organizations conducted reconnaissance against the AFSR: the Revolutionary Military Council, the headquarters and a special department of the 11th Army. The Soviet command, intending to cut off the oil region from the White Army, launched an attack on Kizlyar. To conduct operational reconnaissance, commit terrorist acts and agitation among the mountain population and workers, the Bolsheviks sent about 600 inexperienced agents to the North Caucasus. The main mass of intelligence officers, according to White Guard counterintelligence, went to Kizlyar, Petrovsk, Baku, Grozny, the rest - to Stavropol, Rostov-on-Don, Velikoknyazheskaya, Tsaritsyn, Orenburg, Guryev. The Whites managed to capture some of the agents and find out the plans of the Red Command.
On October 12, 1919, the head of the KRO at the headquarters of the commander-in-chief and commander of the troops of the Terek-Dagestan region, Captain Novitsky, reported on the disclosure of the entire organization of Soviet intelligence in the rear of the AFSR.
On October 18, 1919, the captain reported that after the defeat of the Kizlyar and Grozny organizations, the Bolsheviks held a meeting in Baku, at which they decided to form a new intelligence network, sending agents to Tiflis, Batumi, and from there to Sochi, Tuapse, Maikop, Novorossiysk and further to North Caucasus.
Denikin’s special services established the goals, objectives, and areas of action of some leaders of the Caucasian Communist Committee (KKK), which was engaged in reconnaissance and subversive activities in the rear of the AFSR. His connection with the English workers' party in Moscow and the Transcaucasian Peasants and Workers' Congress in Tiflis was documented. The security authorities of the AFSR managed to learn about the plan for sinking the ships of the Caspian Flotilla, which was developed by the KKK together with the command of the Red Army. In October 1919, counterintelligence arrested the main executor of the upcoming sabotage act and instead introduced its own agent into the organization, thanks to which it had reliable information about the impending explosions. Soon members of the underground were arrested and handed over to a naval court.
In November 1919, counterintelligence at the headquarters of the commander of the North Caucasus troops noted that the Bolsheviks were spending huge amounts of money on intelligence and propaganda. Moreover, in order to lower the exchange rate of the ruble and the cost of living, Soviet emissaries flooded foreign markets with all-Russian banknotes, which caused discontent among the population with the White Guard authorities. The aforementioned Caucasian Communist Committee spared no expense in attracting officials of the Volunteer Army to secret cooperation, organizing rebel movements in the rear of the AFSR, bribing smugglers and the administration. The heads of Denikin's special services proposed that the authorities withdraw from circulation those banknotes that were distributed in unlimited quantities by Soviet Russia and Germany.
Since the appearance of British transports with equipment and weapons in the Novorossiysk seaport, counterintelligence officers have recorded an increase in the activity of Soviet agents, accompanied by the destruction of military supplies, systematic inhibition of the supply of artillery shells to the front, theft of uniforms, etc.
The port workers, exposed to Bolshevik agitation, according to secret sources, intended to sabotage the work on supplying the army by holding strikes.
The author is far from thinking that the above facts characterize the activities of all the red intelligence officers and agents exposed by Denikin’s counterintelligence. It seems that there were several more of them, but gaps in the source base do not allow us to name specific numbers, names, nicknames of agents, the reasons and circumstances of their exposure, etc. The documents that appeared as a result of the approval of the Quartermaster General could probably tell researchers a lot headquarters of the Commander-in-Chief of the AFSR in August 1919, “Instructions for conducting undercover work by counterintelligence agencies.” The document was intended to ensure secrecy, systematization, regulation and accounting of investigative work, and also established a mandatory procedure for undercover office work for all KROs.
All correspondence about suspects was conducted by the assistant to the head of the department for the investigative part or the head of the point, with the involvement of the most trusted officials for assignments. Paragraph 6 of the instructions read: “All secret employees working on orders from counterintelligence agencies may be recorded exclusively in their personal notebook the head of the counterintelligence agency, which he must always have with him and destroy it at the slightest danger. The entire entry must contain three words: the employee’s first name, patronymic and last name, without mentioning any words relating to the agency, its place of residence and occupation. The employee’s recording must be encrypted with a personally invented code of the head of the counterintelligence agency.” The alphabetical book of secret employees was kept only with an indication of their nicknames and marks of those violations of service and cases of negative behavior of agents that were unacceptable and led to the refusal to register the agent and his expulsion. They were to be stored along with the codes and were accessible only to the heads of counterintelligence agencies and persons in charge of agents.
To consolidate and develop success in the fight against reconnaissance and subversive activities of the Reds, Denikin’s security agencies lacked material and financial resources, experienced staff members and agents. A serious obstacle was the daily turnover and bureaucratic routine, the lack of interaction between counterintelligence bodies of various departmental subordination - the headquarters of the AFSR and the General Staff department of the Military Directorate.
If the white intelligence services achieved certain results in exposing Soviet intelligence organizations, then identifying lone agents hunting for secrets at headquarters turned out to be a difficult task for counterintelligence. Bolshevik agents who infiltrated institutions often remained undiscovered.
The fight against espionage at that time was carried out according to the following simple scheme: obtaining primary information, monitoring individuals, exposing them, arresting them and putting them on trial. These tasks were solved through internal (secret agents) and external (filters) surveillance. Receiving information from various sources, counterintelligence officials systematized all the data, developed the material received, and kept records and registration of persons suspected of espionage. For all its apparent simplicity, identifying enemy intelligence officers or agents was a complex matter. “The greatest difficulty is in obtaining information about persons suspected of military espionage due to the fact that the spy works alone, not together, as was the case in underground political organizations, where you can always find dissatisfied Azefs,” he writes in his book “Secret Military Intelligence and fight against it” General N.S. Batyushin. - Therefore, to detect a spy, who usually does not stand out in any way from environment, the matter is not easy and is possible only with the broad assistance of not only government bodies knowledgeable in this matter, but mainly all segments of the population, intelligently educated in order to preserve the military secrets of the state, that is, as a result, their own interests, with the collapse of the state they usually suffer and private interests of subjects."
In our opinion, the fight against the agents of the Soviet special services was partly made more difficult by the fact that the war was waged against fellow tribesmen, speakers of the same language, culture and mentality. The resulting split in society separated different segments of the population on opposite sides of the barricades: the intelligentsia, officers, nobility, employees who were secret employees of the Soviet secret services and underground Bolshevik organizations. The system for protecting military secrets at headquarters did not work, and counterintelligence officers did not have the proper qualifications to identify lone intelligence officers.
Presumably for this reason white for a long time It was not possible to reveal the red intelligence officer and underground fighter P.V. Makarov, who acted under the cover of the adjutant of the commander of the Volunteer Army, General V.Z. May-Maevsky. Testing newly arrived officers for loyalty was then simple: they were sent to the front line and only after real active participation in hostilities were allowed to work at headquarters. Since P.V. Makarov knew encryption well, he managed to quickly make a career and gain access to secret information. Taking advantage of his official position, the officer hired his brother, the head of an underground organization, as a telegraph operator at the headquarters of the Volunteer Army, which gave additional opportunities to extract useful information. It was precisely the connection with the underground that led to the failure of the red intelligence officer. Naval counterintelligence arrested members of the organization preparing the uprising in Sevastopol, including V.V. Makarov, and then “his excellency’s adjutant.”
As world and domestic experience shows, the most frequent failures of intelligence officers were associated with the leakage of information to the enemy as a result of betrayal or penetration of his agents into the intelligence agency. In other words, in order to expose red lone intelligence officers in white headquarters, Denikin’s counterintelligence had to introduce its agents, for example, into the intelligence department of the headquarters of the Southern Front or the intelligence departments of army headquarters. But, apparently, there were none in 1919, at least the author does not know about them. But something is known about the work of Soviet agents in White Guard headquarters.
Thus, counterintelligence was unable to hide from enemy intelligence the concentration of Denikin’s armies in the Donetsk basin in February 1919, which allowed the command of the Southern Front to transfer the main forces to the Donbass direction.
In July 1919, intelligence agencies of the Southern Front learned about Denikin's impending attack on Kursk - Orel - Tula.
During the siege of Kharkov by the Volunteer Army, the Bolshevik headquarters had completely accurate information about the number and location of the White Guard units. During the investigation, it turned out that agents under the guise of nurses, representatives of the Red Cross or defectors conducted reconnaissance among officers and soldiers, eliciting the necessary information.
It was no secret to the commander of the South-Eastern Front V.I. Shorin's plan for the White Guard command to break through to Balashov in November 1919. The Whites were then able to break through the defenses on the right flank of the 9th Army, capture Novokhopersk and Art. Povorino. But they were unable to consolidate their success then - during the battles the Reds launched a general counter-offensive.
Some Red intelligence officers managed to work in the White Guard rear for quite a long time (up to six months) and remain undetected while carrying out an important mission. In particular, B.I. Pavlikovsky and A.I. Kholodov established the number of ships and submarines in Sevastopol, the number of teams and their mood.
When the Caucasian Front stood on the Manych River, preparing to strike the troops of A.I. Denikin, red intelligence learned about disagreements between the Kuban Cossacks and the White Guards, which largely contributed to the successes of the Soviet troops.
A group of intelligence officers from the Kyiv underground revolutionary committee led by D.A. turned out to be undisclosed. Teacher (Kramov), who penetrated the headquarters of Lieutenant General N.E. Bredov and supplied the most important information about the plans of the White Guards to the command of the Red Army and partisan rebel detachments.
In Sevastopol, in the Naval Directorate, the reconnaissance station of the 13th Army of the Southern Front of the Red Army also successfully operated, which transmitted qualified intelligence data on the composition and movement of the white fleet, artillery, fuel reserves on ships, and the composition of teams. According to the Crimean researcher V.V. Krestyannikov, white “counterintelligence failed to uncover this residency, which worked successfully before the Red Army arrived in Sevastopol.”
But intelligence officer G.G. Lafar, better known in historical and fiction under the name Georges de Lafar, it was not destined to return from Odessa to Moscow after completing the task. At the end of 1918, on instructions from the Cheka, he was sent to Odessa, occupied by the British and French, with the task of infiltrating the headquarters of the French troops and obtaining information about the plans of the Allies, as well as their numbers. Having settled down as a translator at the headquarters of the French expeditionary force under the operational pseudonym “Charles”, G.G. Lafar managed to send four written intelligence reports to Lubyanka (of which only two reached the addressee). Denikin's counterintelligence was on his trail. Hunt for G.G. Lafar began after the interception by Azbuka of his second report to Moscow from February 12–14. In a message from the Odessa ABC station to the head of the political office under the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Southern Russia, Colonel D.L. Tchaikovsky on March 4, 1919 said: “This elusive “Charles” from Odessa again yesterday sent a (third) letter to Moscow via a well-known channel, we believe (to) his node on Lubyanka. When his first letter arrived, “Izhe-P” (representative) of the Moscow station visited the address indicated on the envelope; such Leger Henrietta, living at the indicated address, has not been identified. Kiselny Lane is located in close proximity to Lubyanka...” Red Scout G.G. Lafar was arrested by White Guard counterintelligence at the end of March 1919.
The detection of Red Agent Walkers was sometimes random. Thus, on December 4, 1919, the head of the KRO department of the Quartermaster General of the Caucasian Army, Colonel Churpalev, reported with a report to the head of the KRC that a certain N. Chistyakov was detained while crossing to the right bank of the Volga, and during a search he was found to have the ID of a Bolshevik intelligence officer.
By the end of the war, the intensity of the work of the front-line military intelligence units of the Red Army was increasing, as evidenced by the intelligence reports regularly received by the Red command.
In May 1920, White Guard agents working in Soviet headquarters drew the attention of counterintelligence leaders to the Reds' awareness of the operational plans of the Russian Army command. In particular, the agents reported that the Bolsheviks knew in advance about the planned transfer of the corps of General Ya.A. Slashchev to the Kerch Peninsula. But identifying Red agents in their own counterintelligence headquarters turned out to be difficult. Only after the departure of the assistant to the 2nd Quartermaster General, Colonel Siminsky, to Georgia, the disappearance of the code and a number of secret documents was discovered. An investigation into this fact showed that the colonel was an agent of the Bolsheviks.
In the fall of 1920, counterintelligence officers identified and arrested two Red intelligence officers - Colonel Skvortsov and Captain Demonsky, who were in contact with the military representative of Soviet Russia in Georgia and conveyed to him information about the Russian army and the plans of its command. After this incident, staff officers reasonably attributed the failure of the Kuban landing operation mainly to the activities of these individuals.
Wrangel's counterintelligence was more successful in neutralizing the walker agents. “Throwing all its free forces to the south, the Red command simultaneously took measures to strengthen its work in our rear,” wrote General P.N. Wrangel. - Recently, again... work on military espionage has intensified, led by the registration department ("Registrodom") of the Caucasian Front... This "Registrod" through its registration points No. 5 and 13, located in Temryuk (Kuban region) and through special points ( “Ortchk”) sent a number of scouts to the coast of the Taman Peninsula, directing them to Temryuk-Taman, and then through the narrow Kerch Strait to the coast of the Kerch Peninsula and further to Crimea and received them back the same way. Within a month, in the city of Kerch and in the adjacent area, six Soviet spies were arrested and a “communication service” organized by the Bolsheviks on our territory with the Taman coast was discovered, which located secret stations equipped with signal flares in Kerch and in the village of Yurgaki (on the Sea of Azov). , spherical mirrors for optical signaling and chemical writing materials. One of these spies, among other documents, also had an instruction to “contact Mokrousov” and “appearance,” that is, instructions on how to find this latter. Guided by the experienced hand of General Klimovich, the work of our counterintelligence radically stopped the enemy’s attempts. Enemy agents invariably fell into our hands, were handed over to a military court and were decisively punished.”
Let us note that P.N. Wrangel somewhat exaggerated the role of the special department of his headquarters in ensuring the security of the army and its rear. Soviet sources refute the commander-in-chief's words. In particular, in September 1920, Red intelligence accurately reported the number of White Guard ground forces in Northern Tavria and naval forces interacting with British, American, French and Italian warships.
On final stage During the war, counterintelligence personnel and their agents from among local residents were given the task of infiltrating the Soviet authorities. A special target for penetration into Bolshevik structures were military revolutionary committees, commissariats, Red Army headquarters, tribunals and the Cheka. The development of such work and its plan were reported in detail by the Chief of Staff of the Commander-in-Chief, Lieutenant General P.S. Makhrov to General P.N. Wrangel and were approved by him.
Thus, in addition to solving problems of providing assistance to their military units directly in the front line, counterintelligence agencies began to solve strategic problems of creating a base for a long-term struggle, designed for many years.
So, during the Civil War, the struggle between Soviet intelligence and White Guard counterintelligence in the South of Russia was carried out with varying success and was episodic in nature, since both intelligence services were, by and large, still at initial stage of its development. But at the same time, the following trend is still visible: with the strengthening of the power of the state, its intelligence services are strengthened, and vice versa. The victories won by the Red Army expanded the potential of Soviet intelligence, and the defeats of the Russian Army, the reduction of territories, human and material resources narrowed the capabilities of Wrangel’s counterintelligence. For this reason, the struggle of white émigré organizations against Soviet Russia was doomed to defeat. Further developments convincingly confirm this conclusion.
After the conclusion of the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty Germany occupied Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic states. It was important for the Germans to control the Bolshevik government so that the Eastern Front would not be restored against them, to support separatist-minded national outskirts in order to prevent the unification of Russia and pumping out material resources. The head of the German Foreign Ministry, R. von Kühlmann, instructed the ambassador in Moscow: “Please use large sums, since we are extremely interested in the Bolsheviks surviving... We are not interested in supporting the monarchical idea that will reunite Russia. On the contrary, we should try to prevent the consolidation of Russia as much as possible, and from this point of view we should support the extreme left parties."
Germany made a bet on separatism even before the First World War. The well-known Count F. Schullenburg, who arrived in Tiflis in 1911 as a vice-consul, having studied Transcaucasia well and established extensive connections in high-society Georgian-Armenian circles, concentrated his efforts on working among Georgian nationalists with the goal of proclaiming the independence of Georgia under the protectorate of Germany.
The war for some time interrupted the active intelligence activities of F. Schullenburg in the Transcaucasus. Two months before it began, he unexpectedly went on vacation to his homeland and soon took an active part in the formation of the Georgian national legion, which later fought on the side of Germany on the Turkish front.
At the end of 1918, F. Schullenburg reappeared in Transcaucasia as the head of the diplomatic mission under the commander of the German occupation forces, General K. von Kress, and carried out a number of political combinations to conclude agreements between the mountaineers and the Musavatists with the aim of uniting Transcaucasia and the North Caucasus into a single state system. Again under German protectorate.
The organization by F. Schullenburg of a new residency under the legal name “German-Georgian Verein”, headed by the German military doctor Merzweler, also dates back to this period. There is also an attempt to organize a “German-Armenian Verein”, but it ended in failure.
According to the German researcher X. Revere, in the First world war Germany made considerable efforts to develop separatism in Ukraine with the aim of separating it from Russia. Conspiracy events were carried out by diplomatic missions in Bucharest and Constantinople. However, the efforts of German agents over several years of war did not bring the desired results. Ukrainian separatism began to noticeably manifest itself only after February 1917.
Even after the revolution of November 1918, having withdrawn its troops from Ukraine and Crimea, Germany continued to secretly solve its political problems, maintaining operational connections and an intelligence network.
The head of German military intelligence, V. Nikolai, believed that the cessation of hostilities in Europe did not lead to the end of the secret war. He preserved the Kaiser's intelligence archives, thereby facilitating the creation of a new secret service hidden from the victorious states. Thus, in September 1919, a military intelligence and counterintelligence body (Abwehr) was created as part of the Military Directorate. As an official area of activity, he was entrusted with the tasks of counterintelligence support for the armed forces. However, in practice, the Abwehr conducted reconnaissance against European countries.
The most far-sighted leaders of the White Guard intelligence services expressed a reasonable assumption that Germany would not be able to come to terms with the loss of its former economic power, therefore it needed a weak Russia for revival and development. On February 13, 1919, the chief quartermaster of the headquarters of the troops of the South-Western Territory reported to the head of the special branch of the General Staff department: “German capital and banks, led by Jewish agents, remained in Russia and in particular concentrated in Odessa, there is reason to believe that the direction is towards the destruction of the Russian state continues. Therefore, the fight against banks dependent on German capital, penetration into their secrets is one of the types of struggle.”
The set task of dismembering Russia and strengthening influence on the outskirts was carried out through German banks and a Jewish organization of large local financiers led by A.R. Hari, Getter and Babushkin. As was established by secret surveillance, they set out to support Ukraine through various political directions and sought to hinder the implementation of the ideas of the Volunteer Army to recreate a united Russia.
At the same time, Germany tried, through diplomatic combinations, to appoint its proteges to leadership positions, which were a guarantee of the safety and integrity of German agents. In particular, attorney Fuhrman, who worked for German intelligence before the war, was appointed to the post of Bulgarian consul in Kyiv. The post of Danish consul in Odessa was held by A.R. Hari, director of the local branch of the Russian-Asian Bank, through him money transfers and directives to German spy organizations were made. Hari, together with other persons, during the French stay in Odessa, bought French currency, which contributed to the depreciation of the ruble. Local counterintelligence knew about this, but did not take any measures. But when the population became outraged, she arrested the entire group. However, the attackers were soon released under the guarantee of a certain Botkin, an adventurer who played a prominent role in Odessa counterintelligence.
In the South of Russia, the Germans were guided by political forces that did not share allied relations with the Entente countries and stood for an alliance with Germany. In hidden opposition to the command of the Volunteer Army and the All-Russian Socialist Republic was the monarchist party, which represented a significant, although not really manifested, force. In addition to the aristocracy, it included a significant number of officers and even soldiers. With the help of the monarchists, the Germans hoped to organize a conspiracy to remove the senior command of the AFSR and replace it with people of German orientation, in order to then conclude an alliance with Russia.
In addition, German intelligence pinned its hopes on Russian officers returning from Germany to their homeland, providing them with appearances to their agents in Russia and Constantinople to provide them with money and provide instructions.
Despite the unsystematic nature of countering German espionage, White Guard counterintelligence identified German intelligence centers in Constantinople, Novorossiysk, Rostov, Kharkov, Nikolaev, Simferopol and Sevastopol, as well as their agents. According to verified data, in Rostov, Taganrog and Novocherkassk there were about 100 German officers left by intelligence after the occupation as residents. However, due to the lack of loans for the maintenance of agents and payment for the services of random informants, the counterintelligence unit lost any opportunity to pay attention to the German spy organization. Further observation in this direction was sporadic.
Some organizations oriented towards Germany were nevertheless liquidated by the White Guards. But for the reasons stated above, counterintelligence was unable to bring the matter to its logical conclusion - to bring the perpetrators to justice. Head of the KRC special branch of the General Staff department, captain L.S. Dmitriev wrote in August 1919 that, having observed the counterintelligence of the AFSR for six months, he had not heard of a single spy liquidation, or a single completed process, except for lynchings.
Nevertheless, German intelligence was never able to realize the political goals of its government - to bring pro-German politicians to power in Russia and conclude an agreement with them that was beneficial for Germany. However, this can hardly be attributed to the White Guard intelligence services. Germany's further policy was influenced by its defeat in the First World War, which ended with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919, as a result of which the country was deprived of the right to have a General Staff and intelligence service, and suffered an economic crisis and internal political turmoil.
The intention of the leaders of the White movement to preserve the integrity of Russia was considered by the ruling circles of the states formed on the territory of the former empire as great-power Russian chauvinism. Therefore, already in 1918, the newly formed intelligence services of the “independent” Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR)- the intelligence and foreign (he supervised the work of the military attache) departments of the 1st Quartermaster General of the General Staff - began active reconnaissance and subversive activities against the White movement in the South of Russia. The Hetman's special services collected intelligence information about the military potential of the Volunteer Army and the “aggressive” plans of its command regarding the UPR, as well as about political organizations that carried out subversive work in Ukraine in the interests of the White Guards. The work of Ukrainian intelligence was not limited to obtaining important secret information. She began to carry out special operations, in particular, to secretly provide support to the Regional Government of Kuban in its struggle for independence and maintaining the status of a close ally of Ukraine, and worked to deepen the antagonism between local politicians and the command of the Volunteer Army, since Hetman P. Skoropadsky planned to annex Kuban to Ukraine as a separate administrative unit.
In order to “annex” Kuban, a landing operation on Taman was being prepared by the forces of the Separate Zaporozhye Division, stationed on the southeastern borders of Ukraine. With the close participation of intelligence, heavy and small arms (21 thousand rifles, 8 guns and machine guns), as well as ammunition, were secretly transported from Kyiv to Kuban.
“The political situation in the Kuban,” noted the first secretary of the UPR embassy in Yekaterinodar, K. Polivan, “requires the Ukrainian embassy to immediately begin the broadest and most energetic work possible in spreading the political influence of the Ukrainian state.”
Taking advantage of the favorable counterintelligence regime, UPR intelligence officers, operating under the cover of diplomatic institutions, in the second half of 1918 did a lot of work to bring Ukraine closer to Kuban with the goal of the subsequent possible entry of the region into the whole “on the terms of the federation.” In December 1918, intelligence officers presented proposals regarding the expansion of the presence of Ukrainian special services and the preparation of an armed uprising in the Kuban against the Volunteer Army, but their arguments were not always listened to by leaders, and after the fall of the hetmanate, the matter “was lost.”
Ukrainian historian D.V. Vedeneev found documents in the central state historical archive in Lviv about the activities of the hetman’s intelligence in the Kuban. Under the cover of the post of first secretary of the UPR embassy in Yekaterinodar, the Ukrainian intelligence resident K. Polivan, already mentioned above, acted. According to a report presented in December 1918, the station led by him collected material about the situation in the region and the balance of political forces. A good knowledge of the situation allowed her to carry out political and propaganda actions aimed at deepening the contradictions between the Volunteer Army and the Kuban Cossacks. Denikin's counterintelligence uncovered and arrested K. Polivan. However, according to the report, he managed to return home. Less fortunate was the ambassador, Colonel F. Borzhinsky, who was arrested by the whites and then shot “for treason against Russia.”
In Odessa, counterintelligence identified a center in which officers were grouped who maintained contact with the Petliurists and carried out their intelligence missions. The White Guard intelligence services had information about the location and activities of other intelligence points of the Directory.
Despite the setbacks, Ukraine continued through its emissaries to maintain secret contacts with the ruling circles of the Kuban Cossacks. Thus, on the instructions of the supreme power of the UPR, Yu. Skugar-Skvarsky repeatedly crossed the front line with false documents, collected information about the forces and action plans of the Volunteer Army, and also tried to persuade the Kuban authorities to open armed action against A.I. Denikin. In Yekaterinodar, a Ukrainian intelligence officer received information from a member of the Special Meeting, I. Makarenko, about the redeployment of White military units. On September 15, 1919, he took part in a secret meeting of the Kuban Council, where he called for a common struggle for independence against the forces of Russian reaction. At the end of the month, the emissary provided S.V. Petliura gave a detailed report on his journey. However, this matter did not receive further development. Let us note that the illegal contacts of the top of the Kuban Cossacks with Ukraine were not a secret for the command of the All-Soviet Union of Socialists.
The author does not have any other information about the active activities of UPR intelligence on the territory of the White South. Perhaps she wasn't there. Otherwise, historians of the special services of the current “independent” Ukraine, who consider the White Guards to be Russian chauvinists, would try to fill this gap.
She was very active against the AFSR Makhnovist counterintelligence, combining the functions of counterintelligence and military intelligence. The leadership of the military counterintelligence department behind enemy lines was carried out by the operational department of the headquarters of the rebel army.
The so-called counterintelligence intelligence centers were located in all cities, towns and large villages in the south and east of Ukraine. The main counterintelligence headquarters were located in Odessa, Kherson, Nikolaev, Poltava, Yuzovka, Taganrog, Rostov-on-Don, Yeisk, Sevastopol, Kharkov, Cherkassy, Kyiv. As a rule, they were located in hotels, restaurants, canteens, shoemakers or tailors, as well as factories, factories, and mines. From there, information about the state of the rear and the mood of the workers flowed to the Makhnovist headquarters. According to some reports, Makhnovist agents worked in all White Guard headquarters and military units.
In all likelihood, Denikin’s counterintelligence never managed to reach them. At least, the author has not seen documentary evidence of the identification and arrests of “Father Makhno” agents by the White Guard intelligence service.
Researcher V. Azarov provides data on the effective work of agents behind the lines of the white troops in September 1919. Thus, before the decisive battle near Peregonovka, Makhnovist agents reported to the headquarters of the rebel army “that there were no regular Denikin units as far as Nikopol.”
The counterintelligence unit of the special branch of the General Staff department came to the attention of Polish intelligence (“Military Polish Organization” (VPO), created by Yu.K. Pilsudski back in 1916 for the purpose of conducting military-political intelligence. According to counterintelligence data, on the territory of Russia the VPO recruited agents from among newspaper employees, therefore, in their opinion, Polish newspapers on the territory of Russia could unmistakably be considered as intelligence cells. One such newspaper in Kyiv was the Kiev Diary. Here was the center of the Polish organization in Ukraine, headed by Benevsky. Communication was maintained between Kiev and Warsaw by couriers (mostly women), reports were transmitted on photographic film. Information from the VPO was received by the information department of the Polish General Staff.
During the Bolsheviks' stay in Kyiv, the VPO was in close contact with the Kyiv center of the Volunteer Army. Employees of Denikin’s special services did not rule out the presence of Polish agents in the AFSR, since “the Poles are aware of what is happening here.” However, the KRF of the special branch of the General Staff department, apparently, was never able to identify Polish agents in the headquarters and institutions, since in the report to the management, dated November 30, 1919, the head of the counterintelligence unit did not report anything about this.
Worked against the White Guards in the South of Russia and Georgian intelligence service. For example, she managed to obtain secret information from the headquarters of the Commander-in-Chief of the AFSR, signed by the head of the intelligence department, Colonel S.N. Ryasnyansky and Colonel Melnitsky; secret reports the chief of staff of the Commander-in-Chief of the AFSR, General Romanovsky, then published in the Tiflis newspaper “Fight”; telegram from the head of the Military Directorate, Lieutenant General V.E. Vyazmitinova regarding Georgia. The White Guard command became aware of this only in the summer of 1919. And in September, the agents received information about the Georgian special services recruiting officers dismissed from the army and sending them as agents to the White Guard rear. Quartermaster General of the headquarters of the Commander-in-Chief of the AFSR, Major General Yu.N. Plyushchevsky-Plyushchik asked the head of the department of the General Staff of the Military Directorate to order checkpoints on the Black Sea coast to report the passage of such persons from Georgia to the head of the PRC, indicating their surnames, first names, and patronymics.
Between allies Relations with the command of the AFSR were not easy, since each side in the Civil War pursued its own interests. The leaders of the White movement advocated for a “united and indivisible” Russia. The British adhered to the principle of “divide and conquer.” Based on world practice, it can be assumed with a high degree of probability that the interventionists carried out reconnaissance and subversive activities on the territory of the AFSR. It is very difficult to judge the scale of the intelligence work of Western intelligence services from the White Guard funds of the central state archives, since only a few documents are found on this problem. In particular, it is known that Denikin’s security agencies managed to identify the center of French counterintelligence in Constantinople, as well as a British intelligence organization operating under the flag of the Red Cross. On July 1, 1920, the representative of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army in Switzerland, Efremov, did not rule out the possibility of transferring military information obtained by this mission to the Bolsheviks for reporting to London. Let us remember that it was at that time that the British demanded that the white governments capitulate to Lenin’s “amnesty.”
The naval agent in Turkey learned that a junior officer of the British intelligence department in Constantinople submitted a report to the commander of the Mediterranean Fleet, in which he outlined the reasons for the disintegration of the army of the Odessa region and its rapid abandonment of Odessa. The naval agent informed the Maritime Administration about this case.
In November 1919, external counterintelligence reported that the governments of the Great Powers, not content with the activities of their diplomatic, military and other representatives, were forced to use private organizations such as the International Red Cross, trading societies, etc. for propaganda and intelligence purposes. The intelligence services included such organizations as Young People's Christian Union. Counterintelligence received information from Polynya and Constantinople that representatives of the KHSML were planning to arrive at the location of the AFSR. Taking into account their sabotage activities, Colonel S.N. Ryasnyansky considered it undesirable to allow these persons into the territory controlled by the AFSR. If they appeared, he proposed to establish control over their activities.
Anticipating an increase in intelligence and subversive activities of foreign states against the White South and knowing the level of professional qualifications of intelligence officers, the head of the General Staff department decided to prepare a practical guide for counterintelligence service officials. For this purpose, in December 1919, he asked the military representative of the Commander-in-Chief of the AFSR in Paris to send following materials: laws of foreign countries on combating espionage; description of known espionage processes, practical methods of combating espionage and organizing the fight on the territory of foreign states; printed works on intelligence and counterintelligence issues; instructions and guidelines for conducting espionage, counter-espionage and political investigation; ciphers, systems of secret writing and transportation of secret correspondence abroad; publications on this topic in periodicals. The telegram emphasized that supplying the General Staff department with the specified information is the constant task of the military representative. Whether this manual was prepared - there is no evidence. Even if it was possible to publish it, it is unlikely that this work could be useful to Wrangel’s counterintelligence officers, who found themselves in exile after the defeat of the Russian army. They themselves could teach their Western “partners” the experience of fighting Bolshevik intelligence and counterintelligence.
White Guard regimes in Siberia Not without reason, they saw the main threat to their security in Soviet Russia and Germany, so the efforts of their counterintelligence agencies were aimed at countering the intelligence activities of these countries.
The document entitled " General concept about espionage and related phenomena" gave the following definition of military espionage or military intelligence: "... the collection of all kinds of information about the armed forces and fortified points of the state, as well as the collection of geographical, topographical and statistical data about the country of military significance. This information may be collected for the purpose of transmitting it to a foreign power.” It also defined other types of espionage - economic, diplomatic, political, maritime. An important clarification is made in the appendix that the work of secret agents is not limited only to collecting information, but is sometimes aimed at creating behind enemy lines “conditions that weaken his defensive strength.”
Burovsky Andrey Mikhailovich
RED PROPAGANDA FROM SOVIET RUSSIA On October 28, the new German government breaks off diplomatic relations with the RSFSR: a very terrible ally. The Bolsheviks have already done their job, they brought the Russian Empire out of the war. Now the ally is becoming more and more every day
From the book The Great Russian Revolution, 1905-1922 author Lyskov Dmitry Yurievich7. Intervention and the role of foreign states in the internal Russian conflict In the spring of 1918, the military intervention of the Entente countries began. This force, being formally external, very quickly and deeply became bogged down in the conflict of the Civil War. UK Representative to
From the book Unclassified SS Troops author Zalessky Konstantin AlexandrovichCitizens of foreign states Although during the war the number of SS divisions formed with the involvement of foreign volunteers (primarily Volksdeutsche) was quite significant, nevertheless, foreign volunteers were appointed to the posts of division commanders
From the book From the KGB to the FSB (instructive pages of national history). book 2 (from the Ministry of Bank of the Russian Federation to the Federal Grid Company of the Russian Federation) author Strigin Evgeniy Mikhailovich6.8. Under the microscope of foreign intelligence services 6.8.1. Above we talked about not quite traditional reconnaissance and subversive activities. But many still understand the machinations of enemies as nothing more than espionage. And now it’s time to dwell on it. Let’s start with a curiosity. Not everything
From the book A Brief History of Intelligence Services author Zayakin Boris NikolaevichChapter 52. Training of Russian intelligence officers For obvious reasons, the FSB Academy has always been one of the most closed and, at the same time, the most prestigious higher educational institutions, about which, until recently, little was known. Coming to our country
From the book Executioners and Executions in the History of Russia and the USSR author Ignatov Vladimir DmitrievichEXECUTIONERS IN SOVIET RUSSIA AND THE USSR Structure of the executioner communityImmediately after the Great October Socialist Revolution, as soon as the workers and peasants “took power into their own hands,” the problem of the shortage of executioners was solved. If throughout the Russian Empire in 1916
From the book Notes of a Military Counterintelligence Officer author Ovseenko Mikhail YakovlevichAGENTS OF FOREIGN SPECIAL SERVICES, JOURNALISTS - FREQUENT “GUESTS” OF GANG FORMATIONS Foreign advisers, emissaries of anti-Soviet organizations, and correspondents of foreign agencies acted in the ranks of the rebels. Some of them were killed during the clashes, some
From the book Lenin is alive! The cult of Lenin in Soviet Russia author Tumarkin NinaRuler of Soviet Russia “The fish rots from the head,” says a Russian proverb, which could not be better applied to what happened to the Romanov dynasty. By 1894, when Nicholas II ascended the throne, the autocracy had long been in grave crisis. State system in
From the book Great Novels of Great People author Burda Boris OskarovichThe suppression of the Eugene dynasty in England is slowly recovering from the rather tragic flight from France. There was also a lot of interesting things there, right up to the escape from the Tuileries people besieged by crowds - they dreamed of breaking into the palace and tearing the empress to pieces, as if
From the book Hollywood and Stalin - love without reciprocity author Abarinov VladimirVillain of Soviet Russia(11) Poster for the film “Miss
From the book Catherine II and her world: Articles from different years by David GriffithsManufactures in Russia in Soviet historiography (499) When the Demidovs are mentioned, iron immediately comes to mind, and not without reason: in tandem with the state, the Demidovs created the Russian metallurgical industry, which at the end of the 18th century, in terms of total production
From the book The Great Patriotic War - known and unknown: historical memory and modernity author Team of authorsD. V. Vedeneev. The role of the Soviet special services in the defeat of Nazism (based on materials from the reconnaissance and sabotage activities of the NKVD-NKGB of the Ukrainian SSR) Reconnaissance, sabotage and operational combat activities behind the front line (“behind the front activities”) from the first days
Appendix 2
INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF FOREIGN STATES
US CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
In 1948, the CIA's Special Operations Division was tasked with collecting intelligence on the Soviet Union, its military intentions, atomic weapons, and advanced missiles. In addition, the US CIA was interested in information about Soviet actions in Eastern Europe, North Korea, North Vietnam and other countries. The Americans reached the point of absurdity. For example, high-ranking Pentagon officials demanded that the CIA have an agent with a radio station at every airfield from Berlin to the Urals to transmit classified information.
Similar CIA operations intensified in 1949, when the airlift of American agents into the USSR began, and then agents were sent by land, sea and air from various regions of the world - Scandinavia, West Germany, Greece, Turkey, Iran and Japan. At the same time, abandoned agents collected intelligence data from Murmansk to Sakhalin. For five years, American special operations in the USSR did not produce the desired results and were stopped. However, the losses were great, the costs were significant, and the results were minimal.
The CIA was not the only US intelligence organization collecting information about the Soviet Union. The US Air Force intelligence agencies did the same thing, planning and implementing intelligence programs to obtain Soviet secrets. A number of secret information about Soviet aviation was reported by US official representatives - military attaches, especially during military air parades. All this information was carefully double-checked by specialists.
To collect classified information, US military attaches often used the most modern photographic and electronic equipment, which was usually delivered secretly to the parade area. Reports from military attaches from public events were very important sources of intelligence. Subsequently, the CIA and other US military intelligence agencies significantly expanded the use of technical means in collecting intelligence about the Soviet Union. American intelligence services vigilantly monitored the construction of airfields, missile launch sites, military bases and other strategically important facilities. In addition, such information collected by American intelligence services required confirmation by photographic reconnaissance intelligence services.
As a result of this, the American aircraft of the photo reconnaissance squadron began to carry out the work assigned to them, which later received the code name “Leopard”. At the same time, the Americans began to intensify the collection of information about Soviet military installations using electronic intelligence, which searched for signals from Soviet radars. During these operations, the United States made extensive use of electronic reconnaissance equipment with which the aircraft were equipped. The intercepted signals allowed CIA intelligence agencies to determine whether the radar was being used for detection range of ground-controlled interception or air defense guidance. There were cases when American planes flew deep into Soviet territory.
However, the US CIA paid significant attention to intelligence information about the USSR's atomic weapons, for which special B-29 aircraft were used. Simultaneously with the start of the aerial reconnaissance program, the United States began to organize new ground-based radio interception stations focused only on the USSR.
It should be noted that in the United States there is an Intelligence Community, headed by the Director of Central Intelligence, who is also the Director of the CIA. The Intelligence Community, in addition to the CIA, includes the structures indicated in Fig. 1.
In addition, intelligence activities in the United States are carried out by the intelligence services of the Ministry of Finance, Energy, Pharmaceutical Administration, and the headquarters of the Director of Central Intelligence. DIA, DPR, NSA and the intelligence services of the four military branches are all part of the Ministry of Defense. As for the FBI, it primarily performs police functions within the United States and is authorized by the federal authorities to lead all counterintelligence operations within the United States.
For example, the DIA as a military organization was established in 1961 in order to coordinate the activities of special services of various branches of the US armed forces, performs the functions of the intelligence division of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), the Secretary of Defense, as well as senior field headquarters. The director of the DIA is also the head of the OKNCH intelligence service.
DIA was created by Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, setting as the main task the coordination of intelligence findings and assessments, which had previously been prepared individually by the intelligence services of various branches of the armed forces. The DIA reports to both the Director of Central Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense.
Certain military intelligence services have been retained, including Army Intelligence, Naval Intelligence, and Air Force Intelligence, and continue to perform the same tasks.
As for the DIA, it is in charge of technical intelligence and provides intelligence information to the General Staff of the US Department of Defense. By 1975, DIA staffing had reached 4,600 people, and the annual budget was estimated at more than $200 million.
During the Gulf War (1991), approximately 2,000 DIA personnel were assigned to the US-led Anti-Iraq Coalition Forces in Kuwait and Iraq.
In addition, in recent years, the DIA has been responsible for intelligence support for UN peacekeeping forces. In 1995, a special unit was organized at the DIA - the human intelligence service of the US Department of Defense, which won the right to independently work with foreign agents and open front intelligence firms. At the same time, the DIA is divided into three centers:
1. The Center for National Military Intelligence is engaged in obtaining and extracting military intelligence information from available materials on a wide range of issues.
2. The National Military Intelligence Center for Intelligence Collection manages the military attaché system and also conducts human intelligence.
3. The center of the national military intelligence system compiles information databases, and also maintains catalogs and intelligence archives.
The headquarters of the DIA is located in Pakistan, and the intelligence analytical center is located on the territory of Bolling Air Force Base in southwest Washington. The directors of the DIA are appointed by personal order of the US Secretary of Defense.
In Fig. Figure 2 shows the general structure of the intelligence community of the United States of America.
Undoubtedly, the CIA occupies a key position in the US intelligence community, which was established by President Truman to coordinate American intelligence activities. In September 1947, legislation was passed creating the Central Intelligence Agency, whose mission was to collect intelligence information and conduct covert operations. These operations, according to Truman, should be a response to actions of the USSR that pose a threat to peace and security, as well as discrediting or opposing US policy.
To conduct secret operations against the USSR, a special directive was adopted, and subsequently a mechanism for conducting secret operations was developed.
Its leader Dulles played a significant role in the activities of the CIA, creating a special culture and a unique atmosphere. Its main provisions included:
1. We have the power to do whatever the President asks us to do.
2. We are authorized to use any means to achieve our goals.
Between 1950 and 1961, the CIA covered the entire globe with its covert operations. For example, in 1952, CIA agents overthrew the Egyptian King Farukh and brought Gamal Adel Nasser into power. In 1960, U-2 spy planes, developed under the direction of the CIA, quietly circled over the USSR. But one of them, piloted by Francis Gary Powers, was shot down by a Soviet surface-to-air missile in the skies over Sverdlovsk. The pilot himself was captured by the Soviet secret services. He was subsequently exchanged for two Soviet intelligence officers arrested in the United States.
Subsequently, the goals and objectives of the CIA began to change. For example, speaking at CIA headquarters in Langley in July 1995, President Clinton outlined new tasks:
* preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the world;
* fight against international organized crime;
* fight against industrial espionage, etc.
However, the actions of the CIA and other US intelligence agencies show that America has not abandoned its previous goals and objectives, continuing to collect intelligence information on the territory of modern Russia. Although officially the presidents of two states, the USA and Russia, announced partnership and the fight against a new world threat - international terrorism.
ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE
After Israel was declared a state in 1948, Tel Aviv decided to completely restructure the Israeli intelligence services. At the origins of the decision were Isser Beeri and Isser Harel. It should be noted that the Israeli intelligence services trace their history back to the Zionist Congress held in Zurich (Switzerland) in 1929. At this congress, the Jewish Agency for Palestine was formed and later the Haganah, a Zionist underground resistance force operating in Palestine under British rule, was formed. To provide the agency with intelligence information, Sherut Yediot, i.e., a specialized information service, was organized. This service was then transformed into a special service called "Shai". Shai officers interrogated newly arrived refugees from Czechoslovakia, Poland, Germany, Belgium, France, the Netherlands and other countries.
Shai's plans included:
1) promoting the establishment of the State of Israel;
2) the introduction of their agents into the British civil services in order to inform the Jewish and Zionist leadership about Britain's intentions;
3) infiltration into Arab and anti-Zionist organizations in Palestine and abroad;
4) ensuring the security of arms smuggling and illegal emigration of the Haganah movement.
Thus, Shai agents infiltrated British customs, police, postal and transport services.
The successes of “Shai” did not prevent its dissolution; its functions were distributed among new agencies. Thus, the intelligence service of the General Staff was to be responsible for military intelligence, field intelligence, counterintelligence, censorship and radio intelligence. In addition, a special service was established in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was responsible for obtaining political, military and economic information outside of Israel.
Israeli Prime Minister Ben-Gurion also ordered the establishment of an internal security service. Harel, who was born in 1912 in Russia, was appointed head of this service. His father was a prominent rabbi, and his mother was the daughter of a wealthy Jewish manufacturer. In January 1930, he left Russia and went to a kibbutz in the suburbs of Tel Aviv. Soon he headed the Jewish special department, turning it into one of the most effective departments of the Shai.
In 1950, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) established its own military intelligence services. However, exclusive rights to foreign intelligence remained with the political department.
Subsequently, a new intelligence organization was created in the likeness of the American one, but subordinate directly to Prime Minister Ben-Gurion. On April 7, 1951, three years after the formation of Israel, Israeli military intelligence - Mossad, a kind of Central Intelligence and Security Agency, appeared. Foreign intelligence issues were transferred to this service, and it was subordinate to the administration of the Israeli Prime Minister. The first director of the Mossad, the so-called “founding father” of the entire modern Israeli intelligence system, was a native of Jerusalem. His real name is Reuven Zaslansky, who comes from a family of Orthodox Jews.
Shiloah, the founder of Shai (the intelligence agency of the underground Jewish army Haganah), also collaborated with the American Office of Strategic Services (OSS) in Washington, Cairo and Istanbul. In 1949, Shiloah was appointed chairman of the Israeli Intelligence Coordination Committee, created to introduce centralization and establish supervision over the activities of disparate intelligence services.
Later, the entire Israeli intelligence system was again reorganized, carried out by the same Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion.
Israel also had an internal security service, Shin Bet, which was formed on June 30, 1948. Isser Harel became its boss. At first, Shin Bet was part of the Israeli Defense Forces. And at the end of the 50s, Shin Bet received complete independence from Ben-Gurion and became accountable directly to the Prime Minister of Israel. Subsequently, Harel, who was proclaimed the manager of the entire system of Israeli intelligence services, also took control of AMAN - Israeli military intelligence.
Israeli intelligence fought against Arab espionage from neighboring states, which sent in their agents, saboteurs and terrorists. Israeli specialists waged a constant struggle against such Arab movements as Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah. These militant Arab organizations categorically opposed concluding any agreements with Israel. Therefore, for a long time, almost all the forces and resources of Shin Bet were aimed at fighting Arab extremists.
After the USSR abandoned its original policy of supporting Israel and became the main supplier of weapons to Arab countries, Shin Bet began working with Soviet and Eastern European diplomats.
The most significant misstep in Shin Bet's history was its failure to prevent the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on November 4, 1995. The then director of Shin Bet, Carmi Gilon, accepted the blame for what happened. His successor, Rear Admiral Ami Ayalon, came to the security service from his post as commander of the Israeli Navy. This was the first Shin Bet leader whose appointment was public.
In Fig. Table 3 shows the names of people who headed the Israeli security service in different years.
It should be noted that the 70s were marked not only by silent intrusions of spies and secret seizures of equipment, but also by quite noisy operations. On September 5, 1972, Black September members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) secret service seized more than ten Israeli athletes from the Olympic Village in Germany. However, in front of the Mossad chief Zvi Zamir, the German intelligence services failed the special operation to free the captured people. Although the bullets from the first salvo hit the Black September terrorists, some of them still managed to kill the Jewish hostage athletes.
To retaliate against the terrorists who killed Israeli athletes, Committee X was organized, headed by Prime Minister Golda Meir and Defense Minister Moshe Dayan. The committee decided to eliminate all Black September terrorists. This operation lasted from 1972 to 1979 and was successfully completed by the Israeli intelligence services.
An equally high-profile operation was marked by the kidnapping of SS officer Eichmann, who was kidnapped by Israeli services, loaded onto a plane and flown to Israel. He was subsequently hanged. It was revenge for Eichmann's extermination of the Jews during World War II.
By the way, Israeli intelligence agents also conduct special operations on the territory of modern Russia.
In his book, Leonid Mlechin writes that a few kilometers north of Tel Aviv there is a memorial erected in honor of four hundred Israeli intelligence officers who died in combat. Only names and dates of death are provided. Nothing more - no titles, no positions, no circumstances of death. At the same time, army intelligence lost 261 people, Shin Bet - 80, Mossad - 65. At the insistence of the relatives of the dead intelligence officers, the Israeli government erected a monument to those whom they try to keep in the shadows even after death. This amazing monument is a compromise between the desire to keep the scouts' graves secret and the desire to honor the dead.
TURKISH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE
For a long time, Türkiye was a serious adversary of both the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. And in the last decade, Turkish military intelligence and its numerous intelligence services have shown significant interest in Russia, in particular in the Transcaucasian republics and especially Chechnya. It must be remembered that Türkiye is an active member of the NATO military bloc.
At the origins of the creation of Turkish military intelligence, starting on August 5, 1914, stood the heroic personality Enver Pasha. Then back in Ottoman Empire he created a special intelligence organization called Tesquilat I Macheusa.
Currently, the main Turkish intelligence service is the National Intelligence Organization Istikhbaray Teskilati (MIT). This service also carries out counterintelligence operations. Since February 2, 1998, its head has been a career military intelligence officer, Shenkal Atasagun, who previously served as a representative of the intelligence service in England.
MIT was last reorganized on July 22, 1965. It works closely with the intelligence services of European countries and the United States.
From 1992 to 1998, its leader was former diplomat Sonmez Koksal, the first civilian chief of the intelligence and counterintelligence intelligence service. The headquarters of MIT is located in the Turkish capital, Ankara, and its chief reports intelligence directly to the country's prime minister.
According to Turkish newspapers, MIT's budget in 1999 was about 300 million US dollars, i.e. 61% more than in 1998.
Perhaps the most significant success of the Turkish intelligence services is the capture by their agents of the leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party Abdaila Ojalone, whom Ankara's intelligence service had been hunting for 14 years. It must be emphasized that the intelligence community in Turkey plays a significant role, including in politics. This became noticeable after September 11, 2001. For example, the American command allowed Turkey to conduct a series of special operations in Afghanistan.
In recent years, the heads of Turkish intelligence services have intensified their work in various directions, especially with their closest neighbors. For example, in the summer of 2002, Turkish President Necdet Sezer signed a memorandum with Iranian leader Mohammad Khatami on the development of bilateral cooperation in the military field, including in the areas of intelligence and other special services. At the same time, the Chief of the General Staff of the Turkish Army, Hussein Kivrikoglu, together with the Chief of the General Staff of Syria, General Hasan Gurkmani, signed an agreement on military cooperation between Turkey and Syria. It is quite a characteristic moment that Turkey, the closest military partner of the United States and Israel, signed an agreement with the two main opponents of its own allies - Iran and Syria, while remaining a reliable partner of the United States and Israel, including in the field of intelligence and counterintelligence.
Unfortunately, the military intelligence communities of Russia and Turkey are bitter rivals who have fought each other many times. Both states are still spending significant financial, material and human resources in opposition to each other. There is a number of evidence for this. For example, Russian special services have repeatedly detained Turkish agents in Chechnya (Turkish citizen Ali Yaman), as well as in the Stavropol Territory, Chelyabinsk and other regions.
It should also be noted that the Turkish military intelligence services have largely flooded the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Georgia with their agents, and in some cases, official representatives.
In addition, Türkiye, being not the richest country, spends huge financial resources to deploy throughout the territory of modern Russia a significant number of Turkish schools and various Turkish cultural centers, in which Turkish intelligence and counterintelligence services play an important role. Moreover, the geography of these schools extends from Rostov-on-Don to Novosibirsk. The goals of these schools and centers are to create a unified Turkic state in the future - Belikov Turan, something like the Ottoman Empire. According to the plans of the leaders of these radical ideas, this state is supposed to include several Russian regions. For example, according to the official statement of the Russian FSB on April 19, 2001, Turkish special services were involved in the seizure of the Avrasiya ferry in January 1996, and in March 2001 in the hijacking of a TU-154 plane to Saudi Arabia.
I would like to say a few words about Turkish special forces - these are army special forces, which include commando brigades and naval special forces (including anti-sabotage special forces and army combat swimmers). For example, the 1st Commando Brigade is based in the Turkish region of Kayseri, the other brigade is located in Bolu. In addition, the Turkish armed forces have special units of mountain rangers. And the marine brigade is located near Israel. The task of these units is to penetrate enemy territory, carry out sabotage and collect intelligence data. It should also be noted that army special forces take an active part in the training of similar special forces in Kazakhstan, Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan.
Turkish military intelligence special forces conduct operations all over the world: in 1950, a 4.5-thousand Turkish military contingent took part in the Korean-American War, in 1999, a thousand-strong military detachment actively participated in the fighting in Kosovo, and finally, as noted above, helped the Americans in their last war in Afghanistan.
All this suggests that Russian military intelligence agencies and special services should work most actively in the Turkish direction.
From the author's bookDestruction of states - But why is this fact a global, i.e., worldwide secret? - Let me bring you to the answer to this question from different angles, since this is not a very simple question, and the answer to it is not very simple. I have already answered several books where it was appropriate
From the author's bookModern crises and the future of states The modern world is losing stability under the influence of three planetary phenomena: the end of US hegemony, global climate change and the collapse of statehood in some parts of the world. Are these crises something fundamental?
From the author's bookCollapse of States In spaces occupied by weak states or structures with no statehood - whether due to environmental pressure, overpopulation, invasion by the United States, other great powers, or for some other reason - militarized
From the author's bookParticipation of foreign citizens and states in supporting the Dudayev-Maskhadov regime Double standards and information provocations Information provocations were the product of cooperation between anti-Russian forces and Chechen rebels. The information channels they built
From the author's bookRisks of creating two states The uniqueness of the conflict between Palestine and Israel is that each side claims to own the same territory. For Palestinians this is part of their larger homeland, and for Jews it is their historical homeland, land
From the author's bookAppendix 1. Participation of foreign interventionists in the division of the former Russian Empire (1918–1920) Great Britain British troops are primarily the SPSR (Northern Russia Support Forces) numbering up to 28 thousand people, a military mission, a South Russian tank
From the author's bookDynamic set of nation-states Fooled into believing in “deductive” and “inductive” methods, people think that universal principles are nothing more than mechanical “repetition”. Kepler's discovery of the principle of gravity and its discovery
From the author's bookAppendix 2 Ultramodernity, the era of empires, the decline of states Interview with A. Dugin and V. Timoshenko - Business and Investments magazine. 2003. JuneV. Tymoshenko: Alexander Gelyevich, it seems that modern world enters a bifurcation point, after which its development may follow,
From the author's bookReconnaissance UFOs Already in September 1947, that is, at the very beginning Cold War, one of the divisions of General Mills received an order from the Air Force and Navy to develop very large balloons. Made from plastic and filled with hydrogen or helium,
From the author's bookSAVING INFACTORY STATES One of the tasks that requires maximum efforts from the international community is saving incompetent, collapsing states. Carrying out conventional international assistance programs in this case is useless. Meanwhile the situation
From the author's bookChapter 10 THE DARK WORLD OF CORPORATION STATES A terrible “bright future” according to Fursov “By 2020, national borders will be erased not only from maps, but also from human memory. Cultural differences will still remain, but the superpowers will be a few transnational ones.
From the author's bookI. Federal ministries, federal services and federal agencies, the activities of which are managed by the President of the Russian Federation, federal services and federal agencies subordinate to these federal ministries MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF THE RFMinister
From the author's bookII. Federal ministries, federal services and federal agencies, the activities of which are managed by the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, federal services and federal agencies subordinate to these federal ministries MINISTRY
From the author's bookAssassinations of heads of state In light of the above, it should not be surprising that the physical destruction of heads of other states is a well-established type of operation in CIA practice. The series of eight attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro attracts the most attention
From the author's bookChapter IX. Where to Look for the CIA and Other Intelligence Organizations Our government, like other governments, undertakes certain intelligence activities to implement foreign policy and national security.
From the author's bookUsing Terrorists to Conduct Subversive Activities Against Foreign States The US Secret Services not only encourages the terrorist actions of reactionary organizations and uses them to conduct subversive activities against foreign countries, but also
Over the past five years, 137 career employees of foreign intelligence services and their agents have been convicted in Russia, Army General Alexander Bortnikov, director of the Russian FSB, said in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
“Foreign intelligence services continue to strive to penetrate all areas of our state’s activities. Naturally, this meets with decisive resistance from counterintelligence officers. In cooperation with other Russian authorities, the work of 120 foreign and international non-governmental organizations, which are instruments of the foreign intelligence community, has been stopped. As a result of measures to protect information constituting state secrets, 140 people were convicted,” Bortnikov added.
Bortnikov noted that the beginning of the 2000s was remembered for constant reports of spy games against Russia.
“At that time, the results of the work of our counterintelligence caused a great public outcry. In 2000, upon receipt from a professor at Moscow State Technical University. Bauman A. Babkin's secret information about the newest ultra-high-speed underwater missile "Shkval" was detained by US Department of Defense Officer E. Pope. His guilt was proven by the court, but, based on the principle of humanity and taking into account the state of his health, he was pardoned by the President of Russia and expelled from the country,” said the FSB director.
“In 2003,” Bortnikov continued, “the espionage activities of the US intelligence services were revealed, which placed electronic intelligence equipment in railway containers with cargo for the needs of American units in Central Asia.”
According to him, permission for the transit of these trains through the territory of the Russian Federation “was an act of goodwill of the Russian leadership in relation to Washington.”
“We identified and seized more than one and a half hundred spy devices. The case ended in an international scandal and a note of protest from the Russian Foreign Ministry,” Bortnikov added.
As a result of a successful operation by the Federal Security Service in 2006, the activities of four British intelligence representatives working as employees of the British Embassy were suppressed in Moscow.
“Two electronic transmitters were discovered, disguised as stone and intended for contact with agents via wireless communication. All four were expelled from the country. The exposure of British spies, following official assurances from London that it has not conducted intelligence in Russia since the 90s, has compromised the UK. In addition, thanks to our work, facts of financial support and coordination of the activities of a number of Russian NGOs from MI6 became public knowledge,” Bortnikov emphasized.
In an interview with the publication, the head of the FSB also noted the work related to countering terrorism.
“As a result of measures taken over the past 6 years, the number of terrorist crimes committed in Russia has decreased almost 10 times. In 2017, 23 terrorist attacks were prevented. Preventive work is being carried out to prevent the radicalization of various population groups, primarily young people, and their involvement in terrorist activities. Measures are being taken to counter the spread of the ideology of terrorism. The work of over 300 structural units of terrorist and extremist organizations was stopped,” the general said.
According to him, over the past 5 years in Russia more than 9.5 thousand people have been convicted of terrorism and extremism. A significant amount of weapons, ammunition and explosives were seized from illegal trafficking. In fact, the gang underground in the North Caucasus has been completely eliminated.
“Work is underway to block the channels for the transfer of militants of international terrorist organizations from zones of armed conflicts in the Middle East, North Africa and the Afghan-Pakistan zone to Russia, as well as the departure of Russian citizens to these regions. To date, about 4.5 thousand Russians have been identified who went abroad to participate in hostilities on the side of terrorists. Over the past 2 years, more than 200 people have not been allowed to leave. Filtration measures are being carried out in migration flows. More than 1 thousand people have been convicted of organizing illegal migration channels since 2012. Now among the priorities are the opening of “sleeping cells” of terrorist and extremist organizations, as well as countering lone militants, whose attacks have recently occurred in many countries,” Bortnikov noted.
In addition, over five years, security authorities suppressed the activities of 137 career employees of foreign intelligence services and their agents who were convicted; economic damage to the state worth 900 billion rubles was prevented - almost 13 thousand people were convicted of economic crimes, including corruption, including federal officials, representatives of the governor's corps, heads of a number of ministries and departments, state corporations, enterprises and institutions. Bortnikov promised that this work would be continued, regardless of ranks and titles.
The latest types of weapons and special equipment are being developed for special forces of security agencies in the Russian Federation, including a promising generation of unmanned aerial vehicles, control systems for ground and air robotic systems.
Employees and veterans of the special services are celebrating today the Day of Security Agencies Worker and the 100th anniversary of the domestic special services. The professional holiday of security agencies was established by decree of the President of Russia on December 20, 1995 for the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), the Federal Security Service (FSO) and the Main Directorate of Special Programs (GUSP).
On December 20, 1917, the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage under the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR (VChK) was formed, which marked the beginning of the formation of domestic special services.
MOSCOW, December 20 – RIA Novosti, Vadim Saranov. Dozens of career intelligence officers and hundreds of agents they recruit annually come to the attention of state security agencies. In total, thousands of agents and spies from different countries. The FSB of Russia celebrates the 100th anniversary of its founding. Traditionally, one of the department’s key tasks is to combat espionage. Read about the challenges Russian counterintelligence officers face today in the RIA Novosti article.
Four thousand foreign agents
According to the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, in 2016, 13 Russians were convicted of treason, and three foreigners were sentenced for espionage. The numbers are modest, however, according to experts, they are not a marker of foreign intelligence activity.
“The size of the foreign intelligence network in Russia has been constant over the past 25 years; the number of identified intelligence agents is about four thousand people,” retired FSB Major General Alexander Mikhailov told RIA Novosti. “The main question is its activity: during any exacerbation of intelligence the network begins to operate more actively, it is given more global tasks."
According to Mikhailov, only a few of the exposed foreign agents end up in jail. As a rule, the matter is limited to their deportation to their historical homeland, and, interestingly, information about spy scandals is not always leaked to the media. Some exposed agents do not even suspect that they are under cover and are being used by the intelligence services as a channel for disinformation. In total, according to official data, in the first half of 2017 alone, the activities of 30 career foreign intelligence officers and more than 200 individuals suspected of collaborating with foreign intelligence services were suppressed in Russia.
Games with the CIA
According to experts, the United States continues to be one of Russia’s main opponents on the intelligence front. The highest-ranking American spy recently exposed by our counterintelligence agents was the third secretary of the US Embassy, and part-time CIA officer Ryan Fogle. The intelligence officer was arrested in May 2013 while attempting to recruit a Russian intelligence officer. Everything looked in the best traditions of the spy genre - Fogle came to the meeting in a wig and glasses, taking with him a compass and an atlas of Moscow.
“The United States not only has a wide agent network in our country, but actually controls all European intelligence services,” Alexander Mikhailov is convinced. “It is the Americans who develop the tactics and strategy of intelligence activities against Russia, they have excellent cooperation, exchange of information, and analysis of intelligence data. According to In essence, we are confronted by a very serious intelligence bloc, to which all new participants are joining, mainly former Soviet republics."
© FSB of Russia
© FSB of Russia
After the annexation of Crimea and the start of the war in Donbass, Ukraine began to show vigorous intelligence activity on Russian territory. Agents of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense and the Foreign Intelligence Service of our neighbor regularly come to the attention of the Russian special services. The most popular destination among Ukrainian intelligence officers is Crimea, and their tasks are not limited to just collecting information. Members of at least three Ukrainian intelligence groups exposed in Crimea were preparing sabotage at infrastructure facilities. Ukrainian fighters from the invisible front are also “surfacing” in mainland Russia: in October 2017, a worker at a ship repair plant was detained in Tolyatti, who, on instructions from the special services, was collecting information about the work of the enterprise. The failed agent was eventually deported to Ukraine.
Social networks are a springboard for espionage
The intensification of the activities of foreign intelligence services is associated not only with the deterioration of relations between Russia and the West. Experts believe that the state arms program, within the framework of which the latest weapons are being supplied to the army, is of great interest to foreign intelligence services. military equipment. Thus, on December 12, 24-year-old resident of the capital Alexey Zhitnyuk was arrested in Moscow. According to investigators, the Muscovite was collecting information about the Russian Navy and transmitting it through an agent to the US Central Intelligence Agency.
Moreover, foreign intelligence services are actively adopting new technologies - in Russia, cases of recruitment via the Internet are increasingly being recorded. Back in 2011, the United States created the Special Collection Service (SCS), which monitors social networks and selects candidates for recruitment.
“Today, preparation for recruiting a person does not require any special approaches, says Alexander Mikhailov. — A person posts not only his biography on the Internet, but also where he goes, with whom he is friends and even what he eats. Therefore, modern networks represent a colossal springboard for conducting intelligence activities. As for electronic espionage or hacker attacks directly, the events recent years show that our intelligence services, with the exception of isolated cases of betrayal, do not allow serious leaks of classified information. At the same time, in the United States, leaks, roughly speaking, come from all the cracks. This is Snowden and WikiLeaks, but these leaks did not become a big revelation for us - we have known everything for a long time.”
Counterintelligence activities - activities carried out by federal security service bodies and (or) their units (hereinafter in this article - counterintelligence bodies), as well as officials of these bodies and units through counterintelligence activities in order to identify, prevent, suppress intelligence and other activities of special services and organizations of foreign states, as well as individuals, aimed at harming security Russian Federation.
The grounds for counterintelligence agencies to carry out counterintelligence activities are:
a) the availability of data on signs of intelligence and other activities of special services and organizations of foreign states, as well as individuals, aimed at harming the security of the Russian Federation;
b) the need to obtain information about events or actions that pose a threat to the security of the Russian Federation;
d) the need to study (check) persons who provide or have provided assistance to the federal security service on a confidential basis;
e) the need to ensure one’s own safety;
E) requests from special services, law enforcement and other organizations of foreign states, international organizations in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation.
The list of grounds for conducting counterintelligence activities is exhaustive and can only be changed or supplemented by federal law.
In the process of counterintelligence activities, public and secret activities are carried out, the special nature of which is determined by the conditions of this activity. The procedure for conducting counterintelligence activities is established by regulatory legal acts of the federal executive body in the field of security.
Carrying out counterintelligence activities that limit the rights of citizens to the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraph and other messages transmitted over electrical and postal communication networks is permitted only on the basis of a judge’s decision and in the manner prescribed by the legislation of the Russian Federation.
Conducting counterintelligence measures that limit the right of citizens to the inviolability of their home is permitted only in cases established by federal law or on the basis of a judge’s ruling.
If it is necessary to carry out counterintelligence measures that limit the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article, the head of the counterintelligence body or his deputy shall file a corresponding petition with the court. The decision to initiate a petition sets out the motives and grounds due to which the need to carry out the relevant measures arose, and also provides data confirming the validity of the petition (with the exception of the information specified in part two of Article 24 of this Federal Law). The list of categories of heads of counterintelligence agencies and their deputies authorized to initiate a petition to carry out counterintelligence activities that limit the specified constitutional rights of citizens is established by regulatory legal acts of the federal executive body in the field of security.
Consideration of a request to conduct counterintelligence activities that limit the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article must be carried out by a judge alone and immediately at the place where such activities are carried out or at the location of the body applying for them.
After considering the petition, the judge makes one of the following decisions:
a) on the admissibility of carrying out counterintelligence activities that limit the constitutional rights of citizens;
b) refusal to carry out counterintelligence activities that limit the constitutional rights of citizens.
The validity period of a decision made by a judge is calculated in days from the date of its issuance and cannot exceed 180 days, unless the judge makes a different decision. In this case, the flow of the period is not interrupted. If it is necessary to extend the validity period of the decision, the judge makes a decision based on the newly submitted materials.
The refusal of a judge to carry out counterintelligence measures that limit the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article, the counterintelligence body applying for them has the right to appeal to a higher court.
In urgent cases, when delay may lead to the commission of a grave or especially grave crime, or when there is evidence of a threat to the state, military, economic or environmental safety of the Russian Federation, on the basis of a reasoned resolution of the head of a counterintelligence agency or his deputy, when carrying out counterintelligence activities, it is allowed to restrict the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article without a preliminary court order with mandatory notification of the judge within 24 hours from the moment of restriction of the constitutional rights of citizens. The counterintelligence body, within 48 hours from the moment of restriction of the constitutional rights of citizens, is obliged to obtain a judge’s ruling on such a restriction or to cancel the specified restriction.
The judge’s decision on the admissibility of carrying out counterintelligence measures that limit the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article, and the materials that served as the basis for its adoption, are stored in counterintelligence agencies.
The petition of the head of the counterintelligence body or his deputy to carry out counterintelligence measures that limit the constitutional rights of citizens specified in this article, the judge's decision and the materials that served as the basis for its adoption are submitted to the prosecutor's office in the event of supervisory checks on materials and information received by the prosecutor's office , appeals from citizens indicating violations of the legislation of the Russian Federation by counterintelligence agencies.
The results of counterintelligence activities can be used in criminal proceedings in the manner established by criminal procedural legislation for the use of the results of operational investigative activities.