General results of the exam in social studies. Analysis of the social studies exam in the form of the Unified State Exam. When will the exam results be available?

Rosobrnadzor summed up the results of the main and additional stages of the 2017 Unified State Exam. In general, statistics show that this year's graduates completed the exams more successfully than last year. About 620 thousand people took part in the Unified State Exam.

The number of poor students has halved. This, for example, happened during the history exam. In other subjects, the figures vary, but there have actually been fewer unsatisfactory papers: in biology - by 0.3%, in chemistry - by 1.1%, in literature - by 1.5%, in physics - by 2%, in social studies - by 4%, according to foreign languages- by 25%.

The number of participants who scored from 80 to 100 points in the 2017 Unified State Exam increased by 2%.

Rosobrnadzor does not lose sight of talented graduates who managed to score the highest score in three subjects at once. This year there were six such guys: two from Yekaterinburg and one each from St. Petersburg, Penza, Perm and Kurgan. In 2016, there were only three three-hundred-pointers: from Olenegorsk (Murmansk region), Kemerovo and Kirov.

The number of violations related to cheating has decreased by a quarter compared to last year. However, it “goes” not only to graduates, but also to teachers. Thus, in Ingushetia, a school director was fired for trying to help students take the Unified State Exam. In all regions, teachers are being targeted for firing for accidentally ringing the phone during the Unified State Examination, as well as for the fact that they “overlooked” the students who brought their phone to the exam. Such cases of demonstrative reprisals (even against honored teachers with twenty years of experience) sometimes cause bewilderment.

But as for scandals, this year they occurred not at the time of passing the exam, but during appeals. All over the country, Unified State Examination participants are complaining about gross non-compliance with appeal rules.

In some regions, the conflict commission decided to change the points even before the start of the procedure itself, and notified the graduates after the fact (without the right to appeal, since all the points were already included in the final document; naturally, there was no talk about the graduate’s signature next to the final grade and speech didn't work). In other cases, the organizers prevented both the filing of an appeal and the personal presence of the Unified State Examination participant at the meeting (for example, by “forgetting” to name the date or deliberately preventing the signing of documents necessary for attendance). Graduates also complained that their arguments were not taken into account, and the written justification for the appeal was refused to be filed with the case. The experts tried their best to maintain the original score, citing non-existent assessment criteria and finding fault with little things that do not affect the scoring at all. All this caused a wave of indignation among graduates and their loved ones. An appeal to the Unified State Exam hotline also did not bring results, since at the opposite end the upset parents were told that “the order of the meeting of the conflict commission will not be disputed.”

The blatant injustice towards the appellants, as well as negligence in the initial verification of the papers, is what we will remember about the USE 2017.

Analysis of the social studies exam in the form of the Unified State Exam

Number of students: 3

Number of people who wrote the work: 3

Teacher: Zalevskaya N.I.

Absolute academic performance: 100%

Analysis of the exam in the form of the Unified State Exam showed the following:

Part 1 contains 20 short answer tasks, tasks of two difficulty levels: 10 basic level tasks and 10 advanced level tasks. Maximum primary score - 35

The examination paper offers the following types of short-answer tasks:

Tasks for choosing and recording one or more correct answers from the proposed list of answers;

A task to identify the structural elements of concepts using diagrams and tables;

The task is to establish correspondence between positions presented in two sets;

A task to differentiate facts and opinions in social information;

The task is to define terms and concepts corresponding to the proposed context.

Tasks 1-3 are aimed at testing knowledge and understanding of the biosocial essence of a person, the main stages and factors of personal socialization, patterns and trends in the development of society, basic social institutions and processes, etc.

Tasks 4-19 include tasks of basic and advanced levels aimed at testing the development of skills: characterize from a scientific point of view, the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as whole system; search social information presented in various sign systems(text, diagram, table, diagram); apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive problems on current social problems. The tasks in this group represent the traditional five thematic modules of the social science course: man and society, including cognition and spiritual culture (tasks 4-6); economics (tasks 7-10), social relations (tasks 11, 12); politics (tasks 13-15); law (tasks 16-19).

Task 20 is aimed at testing the skills: analyze and summarize disordered social information; distinguish it contains facts and opinions, arguments and conclusions; explain internal and external connections (cause-and-effect and functional) of the studied social objects (including interactions between man and society, society and nature, society and culture, subsystems and structural elements of the social system, social qualities person.

Part 2 contains 9 tasks with detailed answers, two tasks of a basic level (21 and 22) and seven tasks of a high level of complexity (23-29). The maximum primary score is 27.

Tasks 21 and 22 are aimed primarily at identifying the ability to find, consciously perceive and accurately reproduce information contained in the text explicitly (task 21), as well as apply it in a given context.

Task 23 is aimed at characterizing (or explaining, or specifying) the text or its individual provisions based on the course studied, based on contextual social science knowledge.

Task 24 involves the use of text information in another cognitive situation, independent formulation and argumentation of evaluative, predictive and other judgments related to the problems of the text.

Task 25 tests the ability to independently discover the meaning of key social science concepts and apply them in a given context.

Task 26 tests the ability to concretize the studied theoretical positions and concepts with examples. social sciences, forming a social science course.

Task-task 27 requires: analysis of the information presented, including statistical and graphical information; explanations of the connection between social objects and processes; formulation and argumentation of independent evaluative, prognostic and other judgments, explanations, conclusions. This task tests your ability to use

social science knowledge in the process of solving cognitive problems on current social problems.

Task 28 requires drawing up a plan for a detailed answer on a specific topic in a social science course. When performing tasks of this type, the following skills are revealed: systematize and generalize social information; establish and reflect in the structure of the plan structural, functional, hierarchical and other connections of social objects, phenomena, processes.

The work is completed by alternative task 29, which directs the examinee to write a mini-essay on one of the five proposed topics.

Tasks 1-3, 10, 12 are scored 1 point. The task is considered completed correctly if the answer is written in the form specified in the instructions for completing the task.

Correct completion of tasks 4-9, 11, 13-20 is scored 2 points. These assignments are graded as follows: full correct execution assignments - 2 points; completing a task with one error (one incorrectly indicated, including an extra, digit along with all the correct digits) OR incomplete completion of the task (missing one required digit) - 1 point; incorrect completion of the task (indicating two or more incorrect numbers) - 0 points.

Complete correct completion of the tasks in Part 2 is scored from 2 to 5 points. For complete correct completion of tasks 21, 22, 2 points are awarded; tasks 23-28 - 3 points each; tasks 29 - 5 points.

Total - 29 tasks (62 points).

The analysis showed that students completed the tasks of Part 1 better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 1)

Picture 1.

Comparative analysis completing tasks of part 1

The analysis showed that students completed Part 2 tasks better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 2)

Figure 2.

Comparative analysis of task completion, part 2

The analysis showed that students improved their performance on tasks at the basic, advanced and high levels (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of task completion (by difficulty level)

Class average - 57,7 (during the trial exam - 44,6 ).

Analysis of the task showed that students completed:

- 56 % of tasks of group 1 (trial - 44% );

- 89 % of tasks from the section “Man and Society, Including Cognition and Spiritual Culture” (trial - 44 %);

- 76 % of tasks from the “Economics” section (trial - 45,5 %);

- 78 % of tasks from the section " Social relations"(trial - 41,5 %);

- 50 % of tasks from the “Politics” section (trial - 50 %);

- 58 % of tasks from the “Law” section (trial - 62 %);

- 100 % of task No. 20 (trial - 66 %);

- 35 % of tasks part 2 (trial - 11 %).

Difficulties were caused by tasks 3, 17 ( a basic level of); 15, 18 (increased level); 24-29 (high level).

According to Rosobrnadzor, during the main period passing the Unified State Exam About 318 thousand participants took social studies, more than 155 thousand took physics, and more than 41 thousand took literature. It is noted that the average scores in all three subjects this year are comparable to the results of last year.

Head of Rosobrnadzor Sergey Kravtsov explained that this indicates the stability of the exam and the objectivity of the assessment, as well as competent work with the results of the Unified State Exam, when they are analyzed and used in the work of institutes for further training of teachers.

At the same time, the department reports a reduction in the number of Unified State Exam participants who failed to overcome the established minimum threshold in subjects:

• in social studies from 17.5% last year to 13.8% this year;
• in physics – from 6.1% to 3.8%;
• according to literature – from 4.4% to 2.9%.

What does a student have the right to do if the university with which he has an agreement for paid educational services loses his license? – The answer is in the material "Licensing of activities" in"Encyclopedia of solutions. Corporate law"Internet versionssystems GARANT. Get for 3 days free!

In addition, it is reported that thanks to the use of technology for scanning the work of participants at examination points, the results of the unified state exams in social studies, literature and physics were processed ahead of schedule established by the schedule for issuing results. Thus, graduates will learn their results in these subjects a day earlier.