Kuliev Elmir is Shiite. ) Read the Koran. ) Read the Quran for free,. (Translation of meanings Kuliev E.R.) Read the Quran online. Facts of using the anti-Islamic term “Wahhabism”

25 082

Recently, the following fatwa of Sheikh Gamet Suleymanov (may Allah protect him) regarding Elmir Kuliev appeared on the Internet:

« Translations of Elmir Kuliev have nothing to do with his manhaj, especially if they are translations of Salafi books. It’s another matter if the question concerns his own books, i.e. books of which he is the author.

As for Elmir Kuliev himself, I have already expressed my position regarding him several times. There are various accusations against him, and therefore, it is necessary that he clearly states his manhaj, especially his position regarding the Ikhwan and other issues. Also regarding Muawiyah and some other companions. Therefore, at the moment, we demand from him that he publicly refute the doubts around him and prove that he is in the manhaj of the salaf. And until he clearly states his beliefs, he is closer to innovation, and therefore avoid such people"(http://sunnapress.com/online-qa/5713-qa-qamet-suleymanov-09-13.html).

We would like to draw attention to some issues due to which many brothers have doubts about the manhaj of Elmir Kuliev. Below are examples and facts of Elmir Kuliyev’s deviation from the path (manhaj) of the righteous predecessors (as-salaf as-salih). These facts of deviation from the manhaj of Ahlu-Sunnah wal-Jamaa can be divided into 5 points:

— Attitude towards authoritative scientists of Saudi Arabia and the government of this country
— Criticism of Muslim rulers
— Support for anti-government protests in Egypt
— Attitude towards such innovators as Yusuf Qaradawi, Said Qutbu and Fethullah Gülen
— Use of the anti-Islamic term “Wahhabism”

1. Elmir Kuliev scolds Saudi Arabia

There is a big problem in these words from the point of view of Sharia. Firstly, it is a bad opinion about Muslims. Secondly, this is slander, which is an even greater sin. Thirdly, this statement is unfair, because Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world that practices the laws of Allah more than any other country. We do not claim that everything in Saudi Arabia is ideal, however, everything is learned by comparison and the obvious fact cannot be denied. What this country has done and is doing for Islam is countless. In this regard, we would like to ask Elmira Kuliyev: Which of the authoritative scholars of Ahl-Sunnah had a bad attitude towards Saudi Arabia and said similar offensive words to the government of this country?

From what we know, all scholars of Ahl-Sunnah, regardless of their nationality, citizenship and place of residence, love and treat Saudi Arabia well. After all, today this is the only country that, at the state level, supports and spreads pure monotheism and the correct belief of the Ahlu-Sunna. Saudi Arabia is also the only country that prohibits and fights against all types of polytheism at the state level ( shirk) and innovations ( bida), which are not prohibited, and sometimes even supported, in many Muslim countries!

On the other hand, we know that this country is not loved and hated by all supporters of innovation (Ahlubid) from among the Rafidis, Ikhwans, Kharijites and other sectarians who do not want the spread of true Islam. This gives rise to the question: Who should and on whom does Elmir Kuliev rely when blaming and insulting Saudi Arabia publicly? On the leaders and scholars of the above-mentioned errant sects, or on your own personal judgments and conclusions, thereby contradicting all the authoritative scholars of Ahl-Sunnah?

Here is what the most authoritative Islamic scholars of our time said about Saudi Arabia:

1. Sheikh Ibn Baz (may Allah have mercy on him):

“This country, Saudi Arabia, is an Islamic country, praise be to Allah, it calls for what is approved and forbids what is blameworthy, it commands to judge according to Sharia and calls for Sharia to prevail among people.”

Sl. "Ahdafu is hamalat al-i'lamiya"

2. Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him):

“I take the Great Allah and you as witnesses in what I say: I do not know that there is a country on earth today that applies Sharia the way this country, Saudi Arabia, applies it!”

“Ujubu ta’ati sultan”: ‒ 49

3. Sheikh Albani (may Allah have mercy on him):

“And I ask the Most Pure Almighty Allah that He will make permanent the good for the lands of the Arabian Peninsula and other Muslim lands, and that He will preserve the state of Monotheism (Saudi Arabia) under the protection of the Servant of the Two Holy Mosques - King Fahd ibn Abdulaziz, and that He will extend his life in submission (to Allah), sound decisions and continuous success."

Moreover, this accusation by Elmir Kuliev against Saudi Arabia does not correspond to reality and the correct understanding of Islam. We would like Elmir Kuliev to provide evidence for his statement that these three Muslim nations tried to unite, and Saudi Arabia prevented them?

Then the following question arises: how and on what basis can these nations unite today, if the populations of these nations are divided into many sects warring against each other, which understand Islam and Allah Almighty in different ways?

Elmir Kuliev also speaks of unification with the Persians, who mainly profess radical Shiism-Rafidism represented by modern Iran. I wonder how Elmir Kuliev imagines the unification of Sunni Muslims with the Rafidis, who curse and revile the companions and wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) day and night? This is more like the lost Ikhwan principle: “let us unite on what binds us and forget what divides us.” At the same time, the Ikhwans believe that incorrect beliefs, which contain many elements of polytheism, innovation and blasphemy, should not prevent people who call themselves Muslims from uniting. Even the famous Ikhwan preacher Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who spent his entire life trying to unite the Sunnis with the Rafidis, recently admitted that he was mistaken and was wrong for disagreeing with the scholars of Saudi Arabia on this issue ().

2. Criticism of Muslim rulers

Elmir Kuliev cites the unreliable words of his associate:

The words attributed to the associate Elmir Kuliev are unreliable, as Sheikh Albani (may Allah have mercy on him) said about this. The full hadith goes like this:

“It is reported that Sa’id ibn Jumkhan said: “Told me Safiyna, who said: “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: “In my community, the caliphate will last thirty years, after which the reign of" Then Safiyna said to me: “Count up: the caliphate of Abu Bakr, the caliphate of ‘Umar, and the caliphate of ‘Uthman.” Then he (again) said to me: “Calculate the caliphate of ‘Ali.”
(Sa'id ibn Jumkhan) said: "And we found that (it lasted for) thirty years." Sa'id said: “I told him: Banu Umayyah believe that they are caliphs, and he said: “Banu Zarqaa are lying! On the contrary, they are kings, the worst of kings."

Ahmad 5/220, at-Tirmidhi 2226, Abu Daoud 4647

At-Tirmidhi cited this hadith with the addition: “Sa’id said: “I told him: Banu Umayyah believe that they are caliphs, and he said: “Banu Zarqaa are lying! On the contrary, they are kings, the worst of kings." I (Sheikh al-Albani - note website) I say: “This supplement was transmitted only by Khashraj ibn Nubata from Sa’id ibn Jumkhan and it is weak, since there is weakness in Khashraj. Al-Dahabi reported this in ad-Du'afa and said: “an-Nasai said: “He is not strong.” Al-Hafiz in at-Taqrib said: “Truthful, but he was wrong.” I say: As for the basis of the hadith, it is authentic” (“Silsila al-sahiha” (1/742)).

As we can see, this addition to the hadith is unreliable, therefore it cannot serve as proof of the statement that the companions criticized the rulers. Moreover, we know of dozens of reliable reports that the Companions forbade speaking ill of the rulers. Among them:

1) Anas ibn Malik, who said:

“Adults from among the companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) forbade us to defame the rulers, and they said: “Do not scold your rulers, do not deceive them and do not hate them! Fear Allah and endure, for verily relief is near!””

At-Tabarani in “al-Kabir” 7609, Ibn Abi ‘Asim in “al-Sunnah” 1015, al-Bayhaqi in “al-Shu’ab” 6/96. Sheikh al-Albani, Dr. Basim al-Jawabra and Dr. Ridaullah al-Mubarakfuri confirmed the authenticity of the isnad

2) ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Uqayma:

“I will never help anyone in murder after the death of ‘Uthman.” He was asked: “Did you take part in the murder of ‘Usman?!” He replied: “I believe that talking about his shortcomings was an aid to his murder”.

Ibn Abi Shaiba 12/47, Ibn Sa'd in “at-Tabaqat” 6/115. Isnad is reliable

3) Ibn Qusayb al-‘Adawi:

“Once, when I was with Abu Bakrat near the minbar of Ibn ‘Amir, who was giving the khutba in thin clothes, Abu Bilal said: “Look at our ruler, who wears the clothes of the wicked!” And Abu Bakrat said to him: “Be silent, for I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) say: “Whoever humiliates the ruler, Allah will humiliate him!””

Ahmad 5/42, at-Tirmidhi 2224. Sheikh al-Albani called the hadith good

4) Abu Hamza ad-Dab'i:

“When it dawned on me that Hajjaj was hit by fire in the Kaaba (during the battle with Ibn az-Zubayir), I went out to Ibn ‘Abbas, and when I began to scold Hajjaj in front of him, Ibn ‘Abbas said: “Do not become a helper for the shaitan!””

Al-Bukhari in “at-Tarikh al-kabir” 8/104

5) Mu'adh ibn Jabal:

“The ruler of Muslims becomes one with the permission of Allah Almighty, and the one who scolds the ruler scolds the command of Allah Almighty!”

Abu ‘Amr ad-Dani in “al-Fitan” 1/404

6) ‘Uqba ibn Wasaj:

“I was told about the Kharijites and how they defame the rulers. And one day when I met ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr, I told him: “You are from among the remaining companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and Allah has given you knowledge. Here people in Iraq are defaming their rulers and publicly proclaiming their errors, what do you say about this? He replied: “These are those on whom the curse of Allah, the angels and all people is!””

Ibn Abi ‘Asim 933, al-Bazzar 207. Sheikh al-Albani said that this hadith is authentic, corresponding to the conditions of al-Bukhari

7) Abu ad-Darda:

“Truly, the first manifestation of a person’s hypocrisy is swearing at the ruler of the Muslims!”

Ibn ‘Abdul-Barr in “at-Tamhid” 21/287

It is obvious that the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not scold the Muslim rulers, much less allow others to do so.

3. Support for anti-government protests

Elmir Kuliev defends anti-government demonstrations:

Elmir Kuliev does not condemn anti-government protests at all; on the contrary, he even defends them. He believes that the victims of the demonstrations are innocent. However, the question arises: Who forced these victims to go to the demonstrations? If they had stayed at home, would they have died? Doesn't Sharia prohibit demonstrations and protests against a Muslim ruler?

1. Imam Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him):

« As for disobedience to the ruler or rebellion against him, this is a prohibited act in accordance with the unanimous opinion of Muslims. And this even if the rulers are wicked and unjust.”.

Sharh Muslim

2. Imam at-Tahawi (may Allah have mercy on him), explaining the beliefs of the Supporters of the Sunnah and a single community (Ahl-Sunnah Wal-Jamaa) in relation to Muslim rulers, wrote:

« And we consider it unacceptable to stand in opposition and go against our rulers, even if they act unfairly. And we do not call upon Allah against them, and we do not abandon submission to them. On the contrary, we believe that submission to rulers is obligatory submission to Allah Almighty. We submit to them in everything that is not sinful. We also call on Allah for them, and ask Him to protect and improve their situation."

"Aqida at-Tahawiya"

However, some may say that it was the military who came out against the legitimate ruler Morsi and the demonstrators, on the contrary, are defending the ruler. Of course, General El-Sisi did not have the right to overthrow Morsi, but having seized power, he becomes a ruler to whom obedience is mandatory.

The famous medieval theologian Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

« Legal scholars (Ahli Sunnah) are unanimous that if a ruler has taken power by force (i.e. illegally), then it is obligatory (wajib) to obey him and commit jihad under his command. They are also unanimous that submission to such a ruler is better than going against him in order to avoid bloodshed and anarchy.”

"Fath al-Bari"

Also, here are the words of the famous Islamic scholar Sheikh Suleiman Ruhaili (may Allah protect him) about the situation in Egypt:

« I ask Allah Almighty through His beautiful names and His highest attributes to prevent bloodshed among Muslims and protect them from all harms.

There is no doubt that every sane Muslim who has reliable Sharia knowledge rejoices at any act that prevents the bloodshed of Muslims and protects them from this great evil. In this regard, I say: The people of Egypt are obliged to make every possible effort to prevent bloodshed. It must not resort to measures that lead to the killing and bloodshed of supporters of various groups. For bloodshed is a great sin. After all, “A believer can always be righteous until he sheds forbidden blood. If he sheds forbidden blood, he will destroy himself” (hadith).
A well-known rule in the Ahli Sunnah states that if a person usurps power through armed rebellion and begins to exercise control over the country, then such a ruler becomes a legitimate (Shariah) ruler.

And therefore, brothers, we say: Ahlyu Sunnah may consider any act to be forbidden, but at the same time considers that it (this forbidden act) may have legal consequences. Ahli Sunnah does not allow and considers usurpation of power prohibited. The Ahlyu Sunnah considers an armed rebellion against a ruler and a violent rise to power to be unlawful (haram). However, if a rebellion suddenly breaks out and the rebel usurps power, then in this case he becomes the legitimate ruler.
We ask Allah to give the opportunity to the wise people of this ummah from among our rulers, scholars and authoritative people who follow the Sunnah, to give them the opportunity to use all the means that stop bloodshed and the spread of evil.".

We do not condone violence. However, we say that these people themselves are to blame for what befell them. Elmir Kuliyev should have addressed Sharia and explained the position of Sharia regarding rebellion against a Muslim ruler, instead of engaging in populism.

4. Kuliyev’s attitude towards the innovators: Yusuf Qaradawi, Said Qutbu, Fethullah Gülen

Elmir Kuliev declares his commitment to the path of his righteous predecessors, but at the same time does not hide his good attitude to well-known adherents of innovation. Thus, Elmir Kuliev does not hide his stay in the library of the leader of the errant sect of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.

It is a well-known fact that the righteous predecessors boycotted adherents of innovations. A visit to the library of an innovator itself is not a sufficient argument for accusations, because it may be that a person came there to call for something to be approved or to prohibit something that is disapproved. However, even then, it should not be made public, as people may draw the wrong conclusions. Elmir Kuliev puts this photo on public display and calls Al-Qaradawi a “sheikh” and does not warn against him, which could mislead people.

One day Yunus ibn ‘Ubayd (may Allah have mercy on him) saw his son leaving the house of an innovationist and said to him: “ Oh son, where are you coming from?!" He replied: " From so-and-so's house" Yunus said:

“I would rather see you leaving the house of an effeminate man than leaving the house of so-and-so. And it is more beloved to me, O son, for you to appear before Allah as an adulterer, a wicked person, a thief and a traitor, than for you to appear before Him with the conviction of adherents of passions!”

Ibn Batta 464, al-Ajurri 2061, authentic isnad

Imam al-Barbahari (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Notice how Yunus ibn ‘Ubayd pointed out that an effeminate man will not harm his son’s religion as much as an innovator who can mislead him in such a way that he may even become an unbeliever!”

“Sharh al-Sunnah” 87

Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him), who was harsh towards the adherents of innovations and passions, said:

“Do not greet the adherents of your passions or sit with them unless you are severe towards them; and do not visit them when they are sick; and do not transmit hadiths from them!”

"Al-Jami'" 125, Ibn Abu Zayd

‘Abdullah ibn ‘Aun (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Anyone who is in the company of innovation adherents is worse for us than the innovation adherents themselves!”

“Al-Ibana” 2/273

Imam Abu-l-Fadl al-Hamdani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Those who embrace innovation and invent hadiths are much worse than the atheists (for religion), for the atheists strive to corrupt religion from the outside, and they strive to corrupt it from the inside. They are like those inside the city who set out to ruin the situation in it by opening the gates of the fortress to those atheists who are outside. They are worse for Islam than non-believers”.

Ibn al-Jawzi in “al-Maudu’at” 1/51

And if someone asks for evidence that Yusuf Al-Qaradawi is a supporter of innovation, then we will tell him that there are a lot of words from scientists about Al-Qaradawi. The late Sheikh al-Albani (may Allah have mercy on him) gave an excellent description of Yusuf Qaradawi, saying:

« Yusuf Qaradawi's education is Azharic and it does not follow the methodology of the Qur'an and Sunnah. He gives people fatwas (religious decisions) that are contrary to Sharia. He has many philosophical views, and when something forbidden by the Sharia comes, he relaxes it with the words: “There is no specific text forbidding it!”, and by this method he made music permissible. [However, this approach] contradicts the unanimous opinion (ijma’), because the provisions of the Sharia are not necessarily determined by direct texts! Qaradawi also says: “The proof is the Quran, Sunnah, ijma’ and qiyas (analogy).” However, analogy is not proof since it is ijtihad (judgment). On this basis, he permitted many things and relaxed the provisions of the Shariah.".

"Sufiya al-Bana wal-Qardawi"

The prominent Yemeni theologian, the late Sheikh Muqbil ibn Hadi (may Allah have mercy on him), said:

« Among the lost preachers in our time is Yusuf ibn Abdullah al-Qaradawi, the Mufti of Qatar. He became a mouthpiece for the enemies of Islam, and began to use his tongue and pen to fight the religion of Islam!”

"Raf' al-lisam an mukhalifa al-Qardawi"

Also, the famous Sheikh Ahmad an-Najmi (may Allah have mercy on him) said about Dr. al-Qaradawi:

« This man’s ignorance and delusions are destroying religion and its foundations and rules!”

“Raf’ al-lisam an mukhalifa al-Qardawi” 78

Moreover, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi is the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood sect, and how much harm this organization has caused can be understood by looking at the fruits of the so-called “ Arab Spring" How much Muslim blood was shed and what damage was done to the economies and military potential of Arab countries!

So, visiting the library of a well-known innovationist and displaying it, without publicly warning against it, is in no way consistent with the path of the righteous predecessors.

Elmir Kuliev also defends Said Qutb, the ideologist of modern Kharijites and the man who accused the entire Muslim community of unbelief and became the ideological inspirer of modern Kharijites.

Defending Muslims from the errors of Said Qutb, according to Elmir Kuliev, is a defamation of the honor of a Muslim, while he allows himself to slander an entire state (Saudi Arabia), whose constitution is the Koran and Sunnah. Of course, the honor of a Muslim is above all, however, pointing out a person’s mistakes and delusions is not slander or gossip if by doing so you warn Muslims against the delusions of this person.

Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Scientists made exceptions from the forbidden type of gyib (gossip), some permitted types, some of which were even obligatory. This includes clarifying the mistake of those who are mistaken in matters of Sharia, since the sanctity of religion is more important than the sanctity of an individual!”

“Al-Umm” 7/90

Shaykhul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Identifying and reporting someone's innovation and debauchery is not ghibah, as reported by Hasan al-Basri and other imams, if the person does it openly and clearly. Such a person deserves to be punished by Muslims, and the least that is due to him is censure so that people are deterred and distanced from him. And if you do not condemn and do not mention what is inherent in him: debauchery, sins or innovations, then people can be seduced by him and follow him in this”.

“Majmu'ul-Fataua” 15/268

This is what Said Qutb wrote:

« Truly, people who call themselves Muslims are not Muslims. They only live according to the laws of Jahiliya."(See “Maalim fi at-Tariq” 185). Elsewhere he accuses all humanity of unbelief and apostasy, even practicing and praying Muslims: “ Humanity has completely fallen into disbelief. Even those who in different parts of the world on minarets regularly call and repeat the words “there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah,” without realizing the meaning of these words. Indeed, they bear more sin, and their punishment will be more painful on the Day of Judgment. And this is because after they learned the truth and were Muslims, they became apostates and began to worship people.”

“Fi Zilal al-Ghuran” 1057/2

The above harmful statements of Sayyid Qutb formed the basis of the ideology of the Kharijite extremists and, in the future, became a justification for committing terrorist acts and shedding the blood of innocent people. In this regard, authoritative Muslim scholars warned against reading the books of Sayyid Qutb. The famous Yemeni scholar, the late Sheikh Mughbil ibn Hadi (may Allah have mercy on him) said the following regarding Qutb's interpretation of the Qur'an:

« As for the book of al-Zilal and other works of Sayyid Qutb, may Allah have mercy on him, we do not recommend reading them at all, since these books became the reason that some people among the youth became followers of Jamaat-ut-Takfir. Sayyid Qutb is just a writer, but not an interpreter of the Koran."

“Fadaih va nasaih” 64

The eminent Islamic scholar of the 20th century, the late Muhammad Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said the following about Qutb's books:

« Interpretation of Sayyid Qutb, may Allah have mercy on him, there is a lot of misconception in this book. However, we hope that Allah will forgive him. There are a lot of misconceptions..."

The words are taken from the cassette recording “Agwal-ul-Ulyama fi Ibta-l-Gawaid wa Magalat Adnan Aroor”

Further, Elmir Guliyev cites Fethullah Gülen’s fatwa as an argument, without explaining to readers that Fethullah Gülen is a well-known supporter of Sufism and Nursism. Are there really no words from the scholars of Ahl-Sunnah about the hijab? Against the background of all this, the question arises: How does Elmir Guliyev feel about Fethullah Gülen? Does he consider him an authoritative Islamic scholar or a leader of delusion?

5. Facts of using the anti-Islamic term “Wahhabism”

Elmir Kuliev not only uses this far from Muslim, almost mythological terminology, but moreover, he claims that there is supposedly such a movement as “Wahhabis.” Although none of the scholars of Ahl-Sunnah wal-Jamaa ever used such terms in relation to the followers of Islam, much less spoke about the existence of such a movement! Unfortunately, Elmir Kuliev went further than the scholars of Ahlu-Sunnah wal-Jamaa in this matter, although it is reliably known that this term was actually invented by the enemies of Islam against Islam.

In his interview, Elmir Kuliev says the following:

« First of all, it is necessary to clarify the conceptual apparatus. Many people unenlightened in religious matters, including some journalists, readily call ordinary Sunnis who are not related to this movement Wahhabis. It seems that even the authors of the recently published explanatory dictionary of the Azerbaijani language, in which the word “Wahhabi” was given a very vague definition, were unable to explain the meaning of the new term.

It's actually not very difficult. Wahhabism, which emerged in Central Arabia in the second half of the 18th century, today has many faces and is heterogeneous. IN recent years this term was assigned to North Caucasian separatists professing extreme Islamic views, as well as their ideological associates in other countries, including Azerbaijan. Whether it is right to call them Wahhabis or not is another question, but today they are already known by this name, and we will not argue about this.

Another important thing is that it is wrong and even dangerous to equate Wahhabism with Sunnism. Sunnism has existed on the territory of Azerbaijan for many centuries and currently has tens of thousands of followers both in the capital and in the regions. Along with the Jafarite madhhab, Sunni schools made a huge contribution to the development of the moral, ethical and spiritual heritage of the Azerbaijani people and today constitute the traditional religious palette of the country.".

It is surprising that such a seemingly enlightened person in Islam as Elmir Kuliev uses this term. It is known that this term is offensive, because the people themselves, whom Elmir Kuliev attributes to Wahhabis, did not and do not call themselves that. Initially, it should be remembered that Al-Wahhab is the name of Allah Almighty. The founder of the so-called “Wahhabism” movement was named Muhammad. Those who came up with this nickname were afraid to call the followers of the sheikh “Muhammadites”, so as not to offend the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and did even worse, taking the name of the sheikh’s father - Abdul-Wahhab and called the followers of the sheikh - Wahhabis, thereby insulting the name Almighty Allah.

It is also surprising that Elmir Kuliev absurdly using the term “Wahhabis” thereby, in fact, draws a difference between Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab and the rest of the Sunnis. But is this really so?

This is what the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz Ali Sheikh, said:

« O my brothers, we are not involved before Allah in the fact that our efforts were for the sake of any particular madhhab or ideology that is not the truth. Our efforts are only in that, in sha Allah, that reveals the truth and elevates it. And the fact that instead we are trying for the sake of some kind of “Wahhabism” is slander! Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab, when Allah supported him and opened his chest to the truth, did not call for his madhhab and did not call for any particular madhhab, but called for the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger. And those who were jealous (of the success) of this call, or hated this path, wanted to turn away (people from the sheikh) and said: “This call is Wahhabism.” That is, a call to (follow, honor) a person, a call that is not related to the Koran and Sunnah. All of these (accusations) are misleading and lies! Whoever looks at what the sheikh relied on, reflects, reads his books, will see that truly this call is correct, consistent with the Koran and Sunnah, and that the Great and Mighty Allah has prepared for him Imam Muhammad ibn Suud and his children. They defended this call and engaged in it, and helped it, and supported it. And Allah strengthened this truthful, pure call. Which is not a call to a madhhab or a party, but it is a call to the Koran and Sunnah, and to follow what the righteous predecessors of this community followed.".

The assessment of the “movement” of Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is also unclear:

So, we ask Elmir Kuliev to answer the following questions:
1. Is it possible to publicly criticize Muslim rulers?
2. Is it possible to support demonstrations against a Muslim ruler who seized power by force?
3. Does Elmir Guliyev consider Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, Said Qutb and Fethullah Gülen as leaders of delusion?
4. Does Elmir Kuliev consider Muhammad ibn Abduluahhab the mujadid of his century, the imam of Ahl-Sunnah Wal-Jamaa? Is it possible to use the term “Wahhabis” in relation to him and his followers?
5. How does Elmir Guliyev relate to authoritative scientists of Saudi Arabia, in particular to the learned members of Lyajna? Does he think that they are “government scholars” and therefore sometimes hide the truth and do not tell the truth in their fatwas?
6. Who does Elmir Kuliyev, from the scholars of Ahl-Sunnah, rely on when calling the government of Saudi Arabia a puppet regime of the United States? Which of the scholars of Ahl-Sunnah said that Saudi Arabia supports the division between Arabs, Turks and Persians?

The above are just a few examples of Elmir Kuliev’s mistakes, but they are enough to seriously doubt that Elmir Kuliev’s beliefs correspond to the beliefs of his associates. Although Elmir Kuliev himself declares that he follows his companions, and if this is so, then we ask Elmir Kuliev to admit his mistakes and repent. For it is not terrible to be ignorant or to make mistakes, but it is terrible to persist in error after the truth has become clear.

Awards and prizes:

Biography

Scientific activities

In 2002-2006 he worked in State Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan on working with religious entities, studying the features of state-confessional relations and the mutual influence of religious and political processes. Since March 2006, Elmir Kuliev has been director of the department of geoculture at the Institute for Strategic Studies of the Caucasus (Azerbaijan) and a member of the editorial board of the journal “Caucasus and Globalization” (Sweden).

At the end of September 2013, it became known that on September 17, 2013, by the decision of the Oktyabrsky District Court of Novorossiysk ““Semantic translation of the Holy Quran into Russian” / Translation from Arabic by E. R. Kuliev. 1st edition. Complex named after King Fahd for the publication of the Holy Quran. PO Box 6262. Medina Munavvara. Saudi Arabia, 2002. 1088 pp.”, the author of which is Kuliev, was declared extremist and included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Kuliev himself connected this event with flaws in Russian legislation. On December 17, 2013, the Krasnodar Regional Court overturned the decision of the Oktyabrsky District Court and issued a new decision, which denied the prosecutor to recognize the “Semantic translation of the Holy Quran into Russian” as extremist.

Awards

Write a review of the article "Kuliev, Elmir Rafael ogly"

Notes

Literature

Dorofeev F. A. The Koran: history of formation and problems of translations. Materials for the course of religious studies, textbook. allowance. - N. Novgorod: UNN Publishing House, 2008. - 47 p. - 300 copies.

An excerpt characterizing Kuliyev, Elmir Rafael ogly

- Oh, she’s back?
And with the determination and tenderness that happens in moments of awakening, she hugged her friend, but noticing the embarrassment on Sonya’s face, Natasha’s face expressed embarrassment and suspicion.
- Sonya, have you read the letter? - she said.
“Yes,” Sonya said quietly.
Natasha smiled enthusiastically.
- No, Sonya, I can’t do it anymore! - she said. “I can’t hide it from you anymore.” You know, we love each other!... Sonya, my dear, he writes... Sonya...
Sonya, as if not believing her ears, looked at Natasha with all her eyes.
- And Bolkonsky? - she said.
- Oh, Sonya, oh, if only you could know how happy I am! - Natasha said. – You don’t know what love is...
- But, Natasha, is it really all over?
Natasha looked at Sonya with big, open eyes, as if not understanding her question.
- Well, are you refusing Prince Andrey? - said Sonya.
“Oh, you don’t understand anything, don’t talk nonsense, just listen,” Natasha said with instant annoyance.
“No, I can’t believe it,” Sonya repeated. - I don't understand. How did you love one person for a whole year and suddenly... After all, you only saw him three times. Natasha, I don’t believe you, you’re being naughty. In three days, forget everything and so...
“Three days,” Natasha said. “It seems to me that I have loved him for a hundred years.” It seems to me that I have never loved anyone before him. You can't understand this. Sonya, wait, sit here. – Natasha hugged and kissed her.
“They told me that this happens and you heard correctly, but now I have only experienced this love.” It's not what it used to be. As soon as I saw him, I felt that he was my master, and I was his slave, and that I could not help but love him. Yes, slave! Whatever he tells me, I will do. You don't understand this. What should I do? What should I do, Sonya? - Natasha said with a happy and frightened face.
“But think about what you’re doing,” said Sonya, “I can’t leave it like that.” These secret letters... How could you let him do this? - she said with horror and disgust, which she could hardly hide.
“I told you,” Natasha answered, “that I have no will, how can you not understand this: I love him!”
“Then I won’t let this happen, I’ll tell you,” Sonya screamed with tears breaking through.
“What are you doing, for God’s sake... If you tell me, you are my enemy,” Natasha spoke. - You want my misfortune, you want us to be separated...
Seeing this fear of Natasha, Sonya cried tears of shame and pity for her friend.
- But what happened between you? – she asked. -What did he tell you? Why doesn't he go to the house?
Natasha did not answer her question.
“For God’s sake, Sonya, don’t tell anyone, don’t torture me,” Natasha begged. – You remember that you cannot interfere in such matters. I opened it for you...
– But why these secrets! Why doesn't he go to the house? – Sonya asked. - Why doesn’t he directly seek your hand? After all, Prince Andrei gave you complete freedom, if that’s the case; but I don't believe it. Natasha, have you thought about what secret reasons there could be?
Natasha looked at Sonya with surprised eyes. Apparently, this was the first time she had asked this question and she didn’t know how to answer it.
– I don’t know what the reasons are. But there are reasons!
Sonya sighed and shook her head in disbelief.
“If there were reasons...” she began. But Natasha, guessing her doubt, interrupted her in fear.
- Sonya, you can’t doubt him, you can’t, you can’t, do you understand? – she shouted.
– Does he love you?
- Does he love you? – Natasha repeated with a smile of regret about her friend’s lack of understanding. – You read the letter, did you see it?
- But what if he is an ignoble person?
– Is he!... an ignoble person? If only you knew! - Natasha said.
“If he is a noble man, then he must either declare his intention or stop seeing you; and if you don’t want to do this, then I will do it, I will write to him, I will tell dad,” Sonya said decisively.
- Yes, I can’t live without him! – Natasha screamed.
- Natasha, I don’t understand you. And what are you saying! Remember your father, Nicolas.
“I don’t need anyone, I don’t love anyone but him.” How dare you say that he is ignoble? Don't you know that I love him? – Natasha shouted. “Sonya, go away, I don’t want to quarrel with you, go away, for God’s sake go away: you see how I’m suffering,” Natasha shouted angrily in a restrained, irritated and desperate voice. Sonya burst into tears and ran out of the room.
Natasha went to the table and, without thinking for a minute, wrote that answer to Princess Marya, which she could not write the whole morning. In this letter, she briefly wrote to Princess Marya that all their misunderstandings were over, that, taking advantage of the generosity of Prince Andrei, who, when leaving, gave her freedom, she asks her to forget everything and forgive her if she is guilty before her, but that she cannot be his wife . It all seemed so easy, simple and clear to her at that moment.

On Friday the Rostovs were supposed to go to the village, and on Wednesday the count went with the buyer to his village near Moscow.
On the day of the count's departure, Sonya and Natasha were invited to a big dinner with the Karagins, and Marya Dmitrievna took them. At this dinner, Natasha again met with Anatole, and Sonya noticed that Natasha was saying something to him, wanting not to be heard, and throughout the dinner she was even more excited than before. When they returned home, Natasha was the first to begin with Sonya the explanation that her friend was waiting for.
“You, Sonya, said all sorts of stupid things about him,” Natasha began in a meek voice, the voice that children use when they want to be praised. - We explained it to him today.
- Well, what, what? Well, what did he say? Natasha, how glad I am that you are not angry with me. Tell me everything, the whole truth. What did he say?
Natasha thought about it.
- Oh Sonya, if only you knew him like I do! He said... He asked me about how I promised Bolkonsky. He was glad that it was up to me to refuse him.
Sonya sighed sadly.
“But you didn’t refuse Bolkonsky,” she said.
- Or maybe I refused! Maybe it's all over with Bolkonsky. Why do you think so badly of me?
- I don’t think anything, I just don’t understand it...
- Wait, Sonya, you will understand everything. You will see what kind of person he is. Don't think bad things about me or him.
– I don’t think anything bad about anyone: I love everyone and feel sorry for everyone. But what should I do?
Sonya did not give in to the gentle tone with which Natasha addressed her. The softer and more searching the expression on Natasha’s face was, the more serious and stern Sonya’s face was.
“Natasha,” she said, “you asked me not to talk to you, I didn’t, now you started it yourself.” Natasha, I don't believe him. Why this secret?
- Again, again! – Natasha interrupted.
– Natasha, I’m afraid for you.
- What to be afraid of?
“I’m afraid that you will destroy yourself,” Sonya said decisively, herself frightened by what she said.
Natasha's face again expressed anger.
“And I will destroy, I will destroy, I will destroy myself as quickly as possible.” None of your business. It will feel bad not for you, but for me. Leave me, leave me. I hate you.
- Natasha! – Sonya cried out in fear.
- I hate it, I hate it! And you are my enemy forever!
Natasha ran out of the room.
Natasha no longer spoke to Sonya and avoided her. With the same expression of excited surprise and criminality, she walked around the rooms, taking up first this or that activity and immediately abandoning them.
No matter how hard it was for Sonya, she kept an eye on her friend.
On the eve of the day on which the count was supposed to return, Sonya noticed that Natasha had been sitting all morning at the living room window, as if expecting something, and that she made some kind of sign to a passing military man, whom Sonya mistook for Anatole.
Sonya began to observe her friend even more carefully and noticed that Natasha was in a strange and unnatural state all the time during lunch and evening (she answered questions asked to her at random, started and did not finish sentences, laughed at everything).
After tea, Sonya saw a timid girl's maid waiting for her at Natasha's door. She let her through and, listening at the door, learned that a letter had been delivered again. And suddenly it became clear to Sonya that Natasha had some terrible plan for this evening. Sonya knocked on her door. Natasha didn't let her in.
“She'll run away with him! thought Sonya. She is capable of anything. Today there was something especially pitiful and determined in her face. She cried, saying goodbye to her uncle, Sonya recalled. Yes, it’s true, she’s running with him, but what should I do?” thought Sonya, now recalling those signs that clearly proved why Natasha had some terrible intention. “There is no count. What should I do, write to Kuragin, demanding an explanation from him? But who tells him to answer? Write to Pierre, as Prince Andrei asked, in case of an accident?... But maybe, in fact, she has already refused Bolkonsky (she sent a letter to Princess Marya yesterday). There’s no uncle!” It seemed terrible to Sonya to tell Marya Dmitrievna, who believed so much in Natasha. “But one way or another,” Sonya thought, standing in the dark corridor: now or never the time has come to prove that I remember the benefits of their family and love Nicolas. No, even if I don’t sleep for three nights, I won’t leave this corridor and forcefully let her in, and I won’t let shame fall on their family,” she thought.

Anatole recently moved in with Dolokhov. The plan to kidnap Rostova had been thought out and prepared by Dolokhov for several days, and on the day when Sonya, having overheard Natasha at the door, decided to protect her, this plan had to be carried out. Natasha promised to go out to Kuragin’s back porch at ten o’clock in the evening. Kuragin had to put her in a prepared troika and take her 60 versts from Moscow to the village of Kamenka, where a disrobed priest was prepared who was supposed to marry them. In Kamenka, a setup was ready that was supposed to take them to the Warsaw road and there they were supposed to ride abroad on postal ones.
Anatole had a passport, and a travel document, and ten thousand money taken from his sister, and ten thousand borrowed through Dolokhov.
Two witnesses - Khvostikov, a former clerk, whom Dolokhov used for games, and Makarin, a retired hussar, a good-natured and weak man who had boundless love for Kuragin - were sitting in the first room having tea.
In Dolokhov’s large office, decorated from walls to ceiling with Persian carpets, bear skins and weapons, Dolokhov sat in a traveling beshmet and boots in front of an open bureau, on which lay abacus and stacks of money. Anatole, in an unbuttoned uniform, walked from the room where the witnesses were sitting, through the office into the back room, where his French footman and others were packing the last things. Dolokhov counted the money and wrote it down.
“Well,” he said, “Khvostikov needs to be given two thousand.”
“Well, give it to me,” said Anatole.
– Makarka (that’s what they called Makarina), this one will selflessly go through fire and water for you. Well, the score is over,” said Dolokhov, showing him the note. - So?
“Yes, of course, so,” said Anatole, apparently not listening to Dolokhov and with a smile that never left his face, looking ahead of him.
Dolokhov slammed the bureau and turned to Anatoly with a mocking smile.
– You know what, give it all up: there’s still time! - he said.
- Fool! - said Anatole. - Stop talking nonsense. If only you knew... The devil knows what it is!

25 082

Recently, the following fatwa of Sheikh Gamet Suleymanov (may Allah protect him) regarding Elmir Kuliev appeared on the Internet:

1. Elmir Kuliev scolds Saudi Arabia

Here is what the most authoritative Islamic scholars of our time said about Saudi Arabia:

1. Sheikh Ibn Baz (may Allah have mercy on him):

“This country, Saudi Arabia, is an Islamic country, praise be to Allah, it calls for what is approved and forbids what is blameworthy, it commands to judge according to Sharia and calls for Sharia to prevail among people.”

Sl. "Ahdafu is hamalat al-i'lamiya"

2. Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him):

“I take the Great Allah and you as witnesses in what I say: I do not know that there is a country on earth today that applies Sharia the way this country, Saudi Arabia, applies it!”

“Ujubu ta’ati sultan”: ‒ 49

3. Sheikh Albani (may Allah have mercy on him):

“And I ask the Most Pure Almighty Allah that He will make permanent the good for the lands of the Arabian Peninsula and other Muslim lands, and that He will preserve the state of Monotheism (Saudi Arabia) under the protection of the Servant of the Two Holy Mosques - King Fahd ibn Abdulaziz, and that He will extend his life in submission (to Allah), sound decisions and continuous success."

2. Criticism of Muslim rulers

Elmir Kuliev cites the unreliable words of his associate:

The words attributed to the associate Elmir Kuliev are unreliable, as Sheikh Albani (may Allah have mercy on him) said about this. The full hadith goes like this:

“It is reported that Sa’id ibn Jumkhan said: “Told me Safiyna, who said: “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: “In my community, the caliphate will last thirty years, after which the reign of" Then Safiyna said to me: “Count up: the caliphate of Abu Bakr, the caliphate of ‘Umar, and the caliphate of ‘Uthman.” Then he (again) said to me: “Calculate the caliphate of ‘Ali.”
(Sa'id ibn Jumkhan) said: "And we found that (it lasted for) thirty years." Sa'id said: “I told him: Banu Umayyah believe that they are caliphs, and he said: “Banu Zarqaa are lying! On the contrary, they are kings, the worst of kings."

Ahmad 5/220, at-Tirmidhi 2226, Abu Daoud 4647

At-Tirmidhi cited this hadith with the addition: “Sa’id said: “I told him: Banu Umayyah believe that they are caliphs, and he said: “Banu Zarqaa are lying! On the contrary, they are kings, the worst of kings." I (Sheikh al-Albani - note SunnaPortal.com) I say: “This supplement was transmitted only by Khashraj ibn Nubata from Sa’id ibn Jumkhan and it is weak, since there is weakness in Khashraj. Al-Dahabi reported this in ad-Du'afa and said: “an-Nasai said: “He is not strong.” Al-Hafiz in at-Taqrib said: “Truthful, but he was wrong.” I say: As for the basis of the hadith, it is authentic” (“Silsila al-sahiha” (1/742)).

1) Anas ibn Malik, who said:

“Adults from among the companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) forbade us to defame the rulers, and they said: “Do not scold your rulers, do not deceive them and do not hate them! Fear Allah and endure, for verily relief is near!””

At-Tabarani in “al-Kabir” 7609, Ibn Abi ‘Asim in “al-Sunnah” 1015, al-Bayhaqi in “al-Shu’ab” 6/96. Sheikh al-Albani, Dr. Basim al-Jawabra and Dr. Ridaullah al-Mubarakfuri confirmed the authenticity of the isnad

2) ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Uqayma:

“I will never help anyone in murder after the death of ‘Uthman.” He was asked: “Did you take part in the murder of ‘Usman?!” He replied: “I believe that talking about his shortcomings was an aid to his murder”.

Ibn Abi Shaiba 12/47, Ibn Sa'd in “at-Tabaqat” 6/115. Isnad is reliable

3) Ibn Qusayb al-‘Adawi:

“Once, when I was with Abu Bakrat near the minbar of Ibn ‘Amir, who was giving the khutba in thin clothes, Abu Bilal said: “Look at our ruler, who wears the clothes of the wicked!” And Abu Bakrat said to him: “Be silent, for I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) say: “Whoever humiliates the ruler, Allah will humiliate him!””

Ahmad 5/42, at-Tirmidhi 2224. Sheikh al-Albani called the hadith good

4) Abu Hamza ad-Dab'i:

“When it dawned on me that Hajjaj was hit by fire in the Kaaba (during the battle with Ibn az-Zubayir), I went out to Ibn ‘Abbas, and when I began to scold Hajjaj in front of him, Ibn ‘Abbas said: “Do not become a helper for the shaitan!””

Al-Bukhari in “at-Tarikh al-kabir” 8/104

5) Mu'adh ibn Jabal:

“The ruler of Muslims becomes one with the permission of Allah Almighty, and the one who scolds the ruler scolds the command of Allah Almighty!”

Abu ‘Amr ad-Dani in “al-Fitan” 1/404

6) ‘Uqba ibn Wasaj:

“I was told about the Kharijites and how they defame the rulers. And one day when I met ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr, I told him: “You are from among the remaining companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and Allah has given you knowledge. Here people in Iraq are defaming their rulers and publicly proclaiming their errors, what do you say about this? He replied: “These are those on whom the curse of Allah, the angels and all people is!””

Ibn Abi ‘Asim 933, al-Bazzar 207. Sheikh al-Albani said that this hadith is authentic, corresponding to the conditions of al-Bukhari

7) Abu ad-Darda:

“Truly, the first manifestation of a person’s hypocrisy is swearing at the ruler of the Muslims!”

Ibn ‘Abdul-Barr in “at-Tamhid” 21/287

It is obvious that the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not scold the Muslim rulers, much less allow others to do so.

3. Support for anti-government protests

Elmir Kuliev defends anti-government demonstrations:

1. Imam Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him):

« As for disobedience to the ruler or rebellion against him, this is a prohibited act in accordance with the unanimous opinion of Muslims. And this even if the rulers are wicked and unjust.”.

Sharh Muslim

2. Imam at-Tahawi (may Allah have mercy on him), explaining the beliefs of the Supporters of the Sunnah and a single community (Ahl-Sunnah Wal-Jamaa) in relation to Muslim rulers, wrote:

« And we consider it unacceptable to stand in opposition and go against our rulers, even if they act unfairly. And we do not call upon Allah against them, and we do not abandon submission to them. On the contrary, we believe that submission to rulers is obligatory submission to Allah Almighty. We submit to them in everything that is not sinful. We also call on Allah for them, and ask Him to protect and improve their situation."

"Aqida at-Tahawiya"

The famous medieval theologian Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

« Legal scholars (Ahli Sunnah) are unanimous that if a ruler has taken power by force (i.e. illegally), then it is obligatory (wajib) to obey him and commit jihad under his command. They are also unanimous that submission to such a ruler is better than going against him in order to avoid bloodshed and anarchy.”

"Fath al-Bari"

Also, here are the words of the famous Islamic scholar Sheikh Suleiman Ruhaili (may Allah protect him) about the situation in Egypt:

« I ask Allah Almighty through His beautiful names and His highest attributes to prevent bloodshed among Muslims and protect them from all harms.

There is no doubt that every sane Muslim who has reliable Sharia knowledge rejoices at any act that prevents the bloodshed of Muslims and protects them from this great evil. In this regard, I say: The people of Egypt are obliged to make every possible effort to prevent bloodshed. It must not resort to measures that lead to the killing and bloodshed of supporters of various groups. For bloodshed is a great sin. After all, “A believer can always be righteous until he sheds forbidden blood. If he sheds forbidden blood, he will destroy himself” (hadith).
A well-known rule in the Ahli Sunnah states that if a person usurps power through armed rebellion and begins to exercise control over the country, then such a ruler becomes a legitimate (Shariah) ruler.

And therefore, brothers, we say: Ahlyu Sunnah may consider any act to be forbidden, but at the same time considers that it (this forbidden act) may have legal consequences. Ahli Sunnah does not allow and considers usurpation of power prohibited. The Ahlyu Sunnah considers an armed rebellion against a ruler and a violent rise to power to be unlawful (haram). However, if a rebellion suddenly breaks out and the rebel usurps power, then in this case he becomes the legitimate ruler.
We ask Allah to give the opportunity to the wise people of this ummah from among our rulers, scholars and authoritative people who follow the Sunnah, to give them the opportunity to use all the means that stop bloodshed and the spread of evil.".

4. Kuliyev’s attitude towards the innovators: Yusuf Qaradawi, Said Qutbu, Fethullah Gülen

Elmir Kuliev declares his commitment to the path of his righteous predecessors, but at the same time does not hide his good attitude towards well-known adherents of innovation. Thus, Elmir Kuliev does not hide his stay in the library of the leader of the errant sect of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.

“I would rather see you leaving the house of an effeminate man than leaving the house of so-and-so. And it is more beloved to me, O son, for you to appear before Allah as an adulterer, a wicked person, a thief and a traitor, than for you to appear before Him with the conviction of adherents of passions!”

Ibn Batta 464, al-Ajurri 2061, authentic isnad

Imam al-Barbahari (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Notice how Yunus ibn ‘Ubayd pointed out that an effeminate man will not harm his son’s religion as much as an innovator who can mislead him in such a way that he may even become an unbeliever!”

“Sharh al-Sunnah” 87

Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him), who was harsh towards the adherents of innovations and passions, said:

“Do not greet the adherents of your passions or sit with them unless you are severe towards them; and do not visit them when they are sick; and do not transmit hadiths from them!”

"Al-Jami'" 125, Ibn Abu Zayd

‘Abdullah ibn ‘Aun (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Anyone who is in the company of innovation adherents is worse for us than the innovation adherents themselves!”

“Al-Ibana” 2/273

Imam Abu-l-Fadl al-Hamdani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Those who embrace innovation and invent hadiths are much worse than the atheists (for religion), for the atheists strive to corrupt religion from the outside, and they strive to corrupt it from the inside. They are like those inside the city who set out to ruin the situation in it by opening the gates of the fortress to those atheists who are outside. They are worse for Islam than non-believers”.

Ibn al-Jawzi in “al-Maudu’at” 1/51

« Yusuf Qaradawi's education is Azharic and it does not follow the methodology of the Qur'an and Sunnah. He gives people fatwas (religious decisions) that are contrary to Sharia. He has many philosophical views, and when something forbidden by the Sharia comes, he relaxes it with the words: “There is no specific text forbidding it!”, and by this method he made music permissible. [However, this approach] contradicts the unanimous opinion (ijma’), because the provisions of the Sharia are not necessarily determined by direct texts! Qaradawi also says: “The proof is the Quran, Sunnah, ijma’ and qiyas (analogy).” However, analogy is not proof since it is ijtihad (judgment). On this basis, he permitted many things and relaxed the provisions of the Shariah.".

"Sufiya al-Bana wal-Qardawi"

The prominent Yemeni theologian, the late Sheikh Muqbil ibn Hadi (may Allah have mercy on him), said:

« Among the lost preachers in our time is Yusuf ibn Abdullah al-Qaradawi, the Mufti of Qatar. He became a mouthpiece for the enemies of Islam, and began to use his tongue and pen to fight the religion of Islam!”

"Raf' al-lisam an mukhalifa al-Qardawi"

Also, the famous Sheikh Ahmad an-Najmi (may Allah have mercy on him) said about Dr. al-Qaradawi:

« This man’s ignorance and delusions are destroying religion and its foundations and rules!”

“Raf’ al-lisam an mukhalifa al-Qardawi” 78

Moreover, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi is the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood sect, and how much harm this organization has caused can be understood by looking at the fruits of the so-called “Arab Spring”. How much Muslim blood was shed and what damage was done to the economies and military potential of Arab countries!

So, visiting the library of a well-known innovationist and displaying it, without publicly warning against it, is in no way consistent with the path of the righteous predecessors.

Elmir Kuliev also defends Said Qutb, the ideologist of modern Kharijites and the man who accused the entire Muslim community of unbelief and became the ideological inspirer of modern Kharijites.

Imam al-Shafi'i (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Scientists made exceptions from the forbidden type of gyib (gossip), some permitted types, some of which were even obligatory. This includes clarifying the mistake of those who are mistaken in matters of Sharia, since the sanctity of religion is more important than the sanctity of an individual!”

“Al-Umm” 7/90

Shaykhul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Identifying and reporting someone's innovation and debauchery is not ghibah, as reported by Hasan al-Basri and other imams, if the person does it openly and clearly. Such a person deserves to be punished by Muslims, and the least that is due to him is censure so that people are deterred and distanced from him. And if you do not condemn and do not mention what is inherent in him: debauchery, sins or innovations, then people can be seduced by him and follow him in this”.

“Majmu'ul-Fataua” 15/268

This is what Said Qutb wrote:

« Truly, people who call themselves Muslims are not Muslims. They only live according to the laws of Jahiliya."(See “Maalim fi at-Tariq” 185). Elsewhere he accuses all humanity of unbelief and apostasy, even practicing and praying Muslims: “ Humanity has completely fallen into disbelief. Even those who in different parts of the world on minarets regularly call and repeat the words “there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah,” without realizing the meaning of these words. Indeed, they bear more sin, and their punishment will be more painful on the Day of Judgment. And this is because after they learned the truth and were Muslims, they became apostates and began to worship people.”

“Fi Zilal al-Ghuran” 1057/2

« As for the book of al-Zilal and other works of Sayyid Qutb, may Allah have mercy on him, we do not recommend reading them at all, since these books became the reason that some people among the youth became followers of Jamaat-ut-Takfir. Sayyid Qutb is just a writer, but not an interpreter of the Koran."

“Fadaih va nasaih” 64

The eminent Islamic scholar of the 20th century, the late Muhammad Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said the following about Qutb's books:

« Interpretation of Sayyid Qutb, may Allah have mercy on him, there is a lot of misconception in this book. However, we hope that Allah will forgive him. There are a lot of misconceptions..."

The words are taken from the cassette recording “Agwal-ul-Ulyama fi Ibta-l-Gawaid wa Magalat Adnan Aroor”

5. Facts of using the anti-Islamic term “Wahhabism”

In his interview, Elmir Kuliev says the following:

« First of all, it is necessary to clarify the conceptual apparatus. Many people unenlightened in religious matters, including some journalists, readily call ordinary Sunnis who are not related to this movement Wahhabis. It seems that even the authors of the recently published explanatory dictionary of the Azerbaijani language, in which the word “Wahhabi” was given a very vague definition, were unable to explain the meaning of the new term.

It's actually not very difficult. Wahhabism, which emerged in Central Arabia in the second half of the 18th century, today has many faces and is heterogeneous. In recent years, this term has been assigned to North Caucasian separatists professing extreme Islamic views, as well as their ideological associates in other countries, including Azerbaijan. Whether it is right to call them Wahhabis or not is another question, but today they are already known by this name, and we will not argue about this.

Another important thing is that it is wrong and even dangerous to equate Wahhabism with Sunnism. Sunnism has existed on the territory of Azerbaijan for many centuries and currently has tens of thousands of followers both in the capital and in the regions. Along with the Jafarite madhhab, Sunni schools made a huge contribution to the development of the moral, ethical and spiritual heritage of the Azerbaijani people and today constitute the traditional religious palette of the country.".

This is what the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz Ali Sheikh, said:

« O my brothers, we are not involved before Allah in the fact that our efforts were for the sake of any particular madhhab or ideology that is not the truth. Our efforts are only in that, in sha Allah, that reveals the truth and elevates it. And the fact that instead we are trying for the sake of some kind of “Wahhabism” is slander! Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab, when Allah supported him and opened his chest to the truth, did not call for his madhhab and did not call for any particular madhhab, but called for the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger. And those who were jealous (of the success) of this call, or hated this path, wanted to turn away (people from the sheikh) and said: “This call is Wahhabism.” That is, a call to (follow, honor) a person, a call that is not related to the Koran and Sunnah. All of these (accusations) are misleading and lies! Whoever looks at what the sheikh relied on, reflects, reads his books, will see that truly this call is correct, consistent with the Koran and Sunnah, and that the Great and Mighty Allah has prepared for him Imam Muhammad ibn Suud and his children. They defended this call and engaged in it, and helped it, and supported it. And Allah strengthened this truthful, pure call. Which is not a call to a madhhab or a party, but it is a call to the Koran and Sunnah, and to follow what the righteous predecessors of this community followed.".

The assessment of the “movement” of Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is also unclear:

ISLAMIC STUDIES

E. R. Kuliev

Ph.D. Philosopher Sc., Director of the Department of Geoculture, Institute for Strategic Studies of the Caucasus (§§ 2–10, Chapter 1, Chapters 2–5, 7, 9, 10)

M. F. Murtazin

Rector of the Moscow Islamic University, Chairman of the Council for Islamic Education at the Council of Muftis of Russia (Introduction, § 1, Chapter 1, Chapter 6, Conclusion)

R. M. Mukhametshin

Dr. Polit. Sc., Rector of the Russian Islamic University (chapter 11)

L. A. Kharisova

Dr. ped. n., ch. scientific employee of the laboratory for the integration of religious values into the modern education system of the Federal Institute for Educational Development (chapter 8)

ISLAMIC STUDIES

Edited by the Chairman of the Council for Islamic Education under the Council of Muftis of Russia, Rector of the Moscow Islamic University Murtazin M.F. Recommended by the Council of Muftis of Russia

Opening remarks

Islam in Russia has rich traditions and is rightfully considered an integral part of Russian history and culture. The culture of Islam in our country is original and unique; it has its own characteristics, formed over many centuries under the influence of Russian realities, in conditions of close interaction between Muslims and followers of other traditional Russian beliefs.

Today Muslims are playing important role in the economic, intellectual and spiritual development of the country, and their numbers are constantly growing every year. In view of this, the need to disseminate truthful information about the essence of Islam and the nature of relationships with other religions is also increasing.

In order to preserve religious and cultural traditions Muslim peoples of Russia, strengthening national unity, educating young people in the spirit of patriotism and selfless love for the Motherland, as well as preventing the spread among Muslims of ideological forms of Islam that arose in other cultural and historical conditions, the Council of Muftis of Russia considers it necessary to include in school curriculum on an optional basis in the subject “Islamic Studies”.

We believe that teaching Islamic studies will be the next step towards improving the national education system, will contribute to the strengthening of ethno-confessional harmony, and will become a powerful factor motivating moral and intellectual development Russian youth.

Peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you!

Chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia Mufti Ravil Gainutdin

Introduction

Islam is a world religion that was formed among the Semitic peoples of Arabia in a chain of monotheistic religions, which are also called Abrahamic - named after the prophet Abraham (Ibrahim).

The word itself Islam means in Arabic“peace”, “submission”, “tranquility”, “surrender to God”. This points to a fundamental religious idea: a believer who calls himself a Muslim accepts the obligation to be submissive to the will of Allah - the one and only God, the eternal and omnipresent Creator, possessing omnipotence and omniscience. The doctrine of Islam represents the most complete form of monotheism, emphasizing uncompromising monotheism and strict adherence to compulsory religious practice. Islam was sent down to earth through the Prophet Muhammad in the form of the Revelation of Allah Almighty - the Holy Quran. The history of Islam began in 610 with the sermon of Muhammad addressed to a small group of fellow tribesmen in Mecca, and then this religion very quickly spread in the Middle East, North Africa, Andalusia, Iran, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Hindustan, Malaysia and China. Today on globe There are more than one and a half billion followers of this religion and there is not a single large state where Muslims do not live. Although there are different movements within the boundaries of Islam, all Muslims are united by a common faith and a sense of belonging to a single community - the Ummah. For every Muslim, Islam is the basis of his worldview, the essence of his spiritual world, the source moral values and traditions.

Being a comprehensive system, Islam has a developed ideological doctrine. It is based on faith in Allah, in His angels, scriptures sent down to earth through messengers and prophets. This faith also includes an eschatological component: Muslims believe in the Day of Judgment and the onset of eternal and final life, in which all people, after resurrection, will find themselves either in Heaven or Hell. Questions of faith also include the fact that, according to Islam, the whole world and man were created by Allah and exist according to the will of the Creator - moreover, everything that happens in the universe is predetermined thanks to the comprehensive knowledge of the Almighty.

The duty of people towards God is to believe in their Creator, to recognize that only He is the Lord, Ruler, Creator and Provider of all things, only He possesses Divine qualities and only He is worthy of worship. Worship consists of fulfilling those religious duties that constitute the five main pillars of Islam: witness to monotheism and the prophetic mission of Muhammad (shahadah), prayer (namaz, salat), post (hurray, saum), obligatory almsgiving (zakat) and pilgrimage (Hajj). The Prophet of Islam Muhammad is for all Muslims best example a virtuous person, an example of Muslim morality and ethics. His life, deeds and sayings constitute the Sunnah and represent the second source of Islam after the Qur'an.

However, the development of Islam did not stop after the death of the Prophet. On the contrary, deprived of the opportunity to seek clarification on certain religious issues directly from the Messenger of Allah Muhammad and his closest companions, Muslim scientists began to develop various areas of fundamental and applied religious sciences. This scientific asceticism took the form of ijtihad - “zeal on the path of studying Islam”, and thanks to it, such areas of knowledge as tafsir - interpretation of the text of the Koran, hadith studies - the study of the Sunnah of the Prophet, sira - recording the biography of the Messenger of Allah, fiqh - religious jurisprudence, aqida - were formed. theory of faith and many others. Ijtihad made it possible to find answers to many questions that arose among Muslims as Islam spread among different nations living in completely different geographical, climatic, economic and socio-political conditions.

Islam has shaped whole system moral and ethical values that have entered the life of all Muslim peoples. The relationships of Muslims in the family, in society, and in everyday life are inextricably linked with their religious ideas. At the same time, each Muslim region has preserved its own special traditions and customs, reflecting the climatic, geographical and ethnic conditions of existence, and it was this diversity that gave impetus to the development of legal schools and religious movements that allowed Islam to subsequently find its place in different societies and historical eras . Thanks to this diversity, Islam has received the status of a world religion and is actively spreading on all continents, finding an increasing number of followers.

Islam has created a rich treasury of science, culture and art. This happened thanks to special attention, which is given to education. The contribution of Muslims to the development of the achievements of world science has not received due appreciation, but the whole world knows the names of such scientists as Ibn Sina, Ibn Rushd, al-Khorezmi, al-Farabi, Ulugbek, Ibn Khaldun, at-Tabari. Muslim literature gave the world such great poets and writers as Omar Khayyam, Alisher Navoi, Nizami Ganjavi, the legendary tales of Leyli and Majnun, Shirin and Farhat, the famous tales of the Arabian Nights. The iconic architecture of Islam is not inferior in its beauty and sophistication to any other religious architectural tradition: the Kaaba with its strict silhouette, the Mosque of the Prophet Muhammad in Medina, the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, the mosques of Cairo, Damascus, Istanbul, Central Asia, India and Malaysia are real masterpieces of architectural creativity of Muslim peoples.

Islam in Russia has its own special history, a special place and has found its own special paths of development. The first acquaintance of the peoples of our country with this religion took place back in 643, when Muslim detachments reached the ancient Dagestan city of Derbent. And although in those years Islam did not take root in the North Caucasus as the dominant religion, it was this first acquaintance with Arab Muslims that gave impetus to the development of trade and cultural ties with the Islamic world and became the starting point for the spread of Islam in Russia. Thanks to these connections, Islam eventually gained a foothold in the Caucasus, the Volga region, the Urals, Central Asia and Siberia, and many peoples living in these regions have remained traditionally Muslim ever since. The entry of these regions and the Muslim peoples living in them into the Russian Empire led to the fact that at first Islam was seen as the belief of a defeated enemy, but later this attitude softened; Islam was recognized as a tolerant religion. However, the most difficult trials occurred during the period of Soviet power, the period of persecution of all religions. Over the years, almost all mosques on the territory of modern Russia have been liquidated and destroyed, and the system of religious education and enlightenment of Muslims has been completely destroyed. Muslim theology was consigned to complete oblivion due to the translation of the languages of Muslim peoples from Arabic script to the Latin alphabet, and then to the Cyrillic alphabet, as well as due to the ban on the publication of religious literature.

Koran. (Translation of meanings by E.R. Kuliev)

Thank you for downloading the book for free electronic library http://filosoff.org/ Happy reading!

Koran. (Translation of meanings by E.R. Kuliev).
Sura 1

Opening the Book

1. In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful!

2. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds,

3. Gracious, Merciful,

4. Lord of the Day of Retribution!

5. You alone we worship and You alone we pray for help.

6. Lead us to the straight path,

7. The path of those whom You have blessed, not those on whom wrath has fallen, and not those who are lost.
Sura 2

1. Alif. Lam. Mime.

2. This Scripture, of which there is no doubt, is a sure guide for the God-fearing,

3. those who believe in the unseen, perform prayer and spend from what We have provided for them,

4. who believe in what was revealed to you and in what was revealed before you and are convinced of the Hereafter.

5. They follow guidance from their Lord, and they are successful.

6. Indeed, it makes no difference to the disbelievers whether you have warned them or not. They still won't believe.

7. Allah has sealed their hearts and their ears, and over their eyes is a veil. Great torment is in store for them.

8. Among the people there are those who say: “We believe in Allah and the Last Day.” However, they are unbelievers.

9. They try to deceive Allah and the believers, but they deceive only themselves and do not realize it.

10. Their hearts are stricken with disease. May Allah intensify their illness! They are destined for painful suffering because they lied.

11. When they are told: “Do not spread wickedness on earth!” - they answer: “Only we establish order.”

12. Indeed, it is they who spread wickedness, but they are not aware of it.

13. When it is said to them: “Believe as the people have believed,” they say: “Shall we believe as the fools have believed?” Indeed, they are the fools, but they do not know it.

14. When they meet those who believe, they say: “We believe.” When they are left alone with their devils, they say: “Truly, we are with you. We're just making fun of you."

15. Allah will mock them and increase their iniquity in which they wander blindly.

16. They are the ones who bought error for guidance. But the deal did not bring them profit, and they did not follow the direct path.

17. They are like one who kindled a fire. When the fire illuminated everything around him, Allah deprived them of the light and left them in darkness, where they could not see anything.

18. Deaf, dumb, blind! They will not return to the straight path.

19. Or they are like those caught in a downpour from heaven. He brings darkness, thunder and lightning. In mortal fear, they plug their ears with their fingers from the roar of lightning. Indeed, Allah embraces the disbelievers.

20. Lightning is ready to take away their sight. When it flares up, they set off, but when darkness falls, they stop. If Allah had willed, He would have deprived them of hearing and sight. Verily, Allah is capable of every thing.

21. O people! Worship your Lord who created you and those before you, that you may fear.

22. He made the earth a bed for you, and the sky a roof, and He sent water down from the sky and brought forth fruits with it for your sustenance. Therefore, do not deliberately equate anyone with Allah.

23. If you are in doubt about what We have revealed to Our servant, then compose one similar Surah and call your witnesses besides Allah, if you are truthful.

24. If you do not do this - and you will never do this - then fear the Fire, the fuel for which is people and stones. It is prepared for the unbelievers.

25. Give joy to those who believe and do righteous deeds, that for them there are Gardens of Eden in which rivers flow. Whenever they are given fruit for food, they will say: “This has already been given to us before.” But they will be given something similar. They will have purified spouses there, and they will abide therein forever.

26. Verily, Allah does not hesitate to give a parable about a mosquito or something larger than it. Those who believe know that this is the truth from their Lord. Those who did not believe say: “What did Allah want when he told this parable?” Through it He leads many astray, and He guides many to the straight path. However, He misleads only the wicked through it,

27. Those who violate Allah’s covenant after they have made it, and sever what Allah has commanded to be maintained, and spread corruption on earth. They are the ones who will be at a loss.

28. How can you disbelieve in Allah, when you were dead and He gave you life? Then He will put you to death, then He will bring you to life, and then you will be returned to Him.

29. It is He who created for you everything on earth, then turned to the heaven and made it seven heavens. He knows about every thing.

30. Behold, your Lord said to the angels: “I will install a vicegerent on earth.” They said, “Will You place there someone who will spread mischief and shed blood, while we glorify You with praise and sanctify You?” He said: “Indeed, I know what you do not know.”

31. He taught Adam all kinds of names, and then showed them to the angels and said: “Tell me their names, if you are telling the truth.”

32. They replied: “Glorified are You! We know only what You taught us. Verily, You are the Knowing, the Wise.”

33. He said: “O Adam! Tell them about their names." When Adam told them their names, He said: “Did I not tell you that I know the secrets of the heavens and the earth, and I know what you do openly and what you hide?”

34. So We said to the angels: “Prostrate yourself before Adam.” They fell on their faces, and only Iblis refused, became proud and became one of the disbelievers.

35. We said: “O Adam! Settle in Paradise with your wife. Eat to your heart’s content wherever you wish, but do not approach this tree, lest you become one of the wrongdoers.”

36. Satan caused them to stumble over it and brought them out from where they were. And then We said: “Cast yourself down and be enemies to each other! The earth will be your abode and object of use until a certain time.”

37. Adam received words from his Lord, and He accepted his repentance. Verily, He is the Acceptor of repentance, the Merciful.

38. We said: “Get out of here, everyone!” If guidance comes to you from Me, then whoever follows My guidance will have no fear, nor shall they grieve.

39. And those who disbelieve and consider Our signs to be false, will be the inmates of the Fire. They will be there forever.

40. O children of Israel (Israel)! Remember my favor which I showed you. Be faithful to your covenant with Me, and I will be faithful to your covenant. You are the only one afraid of me.

41. Believe in what I have revealed to confirm what you have, and do not be the first to refuse to believe in it. Do not sell My signs for an insignificant price and fear Me alone.

42. Do not clothe the truth in lies, and do not hide the truth while you know it.

43. Perform prayer, pay zakat and bow with those who bow.

44. Will you really call people to virtue, consigning yourself to oblivion, because you read the Scripture? Won't you come to your senses?

45. Seek help from patience and prayer. Indeed, prayer is a heavy burden for everyone except the humble,

46. who are convinced that they will meet their Lord and that they will return to Him.

47. O children of Israel (Israel)! Remember My favor which I bestowed upon you, and remember that I have exalted you above the worlds.

48. Beware of a Day when no one will benefit another, and when intercession will not be accepted, when no ransom can be paid, and when they will not be supported.

49. Behold, We saved you from the generation of Pharaoh. They subjected you to terrible tortures, killing your sons and leaving your women alive. This was a great test (or a great favor) for you from your Lord.

50. Behold, We opened the sea for you, saved you, and drowned the family of Pharaoh while you looked on.

51. So We appointed Musa (Moses) forty days, and after his departure you began to worship the calf, being wrongdoers.

52. After that We forgave you, so perhaps you will be grateful.

53. Behold, We gave Moses (Moses) the Book and discernment, so that you may be guided.

54. So Musa (Moses) said to his people: “O my people! You were unfair to yourself when you began to worship the calf. Repent to your Creator and kill yourselves (let the innocent kill the wicked). This will be better for you before your Creator." Then He accepted your repentance. Verily, He is the Acceptor of repentance, the Merciful.

55. So you said: “O Myca (Moses)! We will not believe you until we see Allah openly.” You were struck by lightning (or killed) while you were watching.

56. Then We resurrected you after death, so perhaps you will be grateful.

57. We shaded you with clouds and sent down to you manna and quails: “Eat of the good things We have provided for you.” They were not unfair to Us - they acted unfairly to themselves.

58. So We said: “Enter this city, and eat plentifully wherever you wish. Enter the gate, bowing, and say: “Forgive us!” We will forgive your sins and increase the reward for those who do good.”

59. The wrongdoers replaced what was spoken to them with another, so We sent down on the wrongdoers a punishment from heaven, because of their wicked behavior.

60. So Musa (Moses) asked for a drink for his people, and We said: “Strike the stone with your staff.” Twelve springs were hammered out of it, and all the people knew where they should drink. Eat and drink from what Allah has provided, and do not create evil on earth by spreading wickedness!

61. So you said: “O Musa (Moses)! We cannot bear monotonous food. Pray to your Lord for us, so that He will grow for us from what grows on the earth, vegetables, cucumbers, garlic, lentils and onions.” He said: “Are you really asking to replace the best topics, what's worse? Go down to any city, and there you will receive everything you asked for.” They suffered humiliation and poverty. They incurred the wrath of Allah by rejecting the signs of Allah and unjustly killing the prophets. This happened because they were disobedient and transgressed the boundaries of what was permitted.

62. Indeed, the believers, and the Jews, Christians and Sabians who believe in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous deeds, will have their reward with their Lord. They will know no fear and will not be saddened.

63. So We took a promise from you and raised a Mount above you: “Hold fast to what We have given you, and remember