Direct competitor Kia Sorento Prime and Renault Koleos appeared in September 2016. Skoda KodiaQ is based on the Volkswage MQB platform. One of the powerful advantages is an exemplary insulation in the class. This in the amount with a seven-leaved salon and electronically controlled by the system of shock absorbers attracts special attention To the Czech product of the autoinducture. And the four-wheel drive and line of motors will also leave indifferent any car enthusiast - in general, everything is restrained and tempting. And how dynamically and practical cars, we will understand more.
Analysis of dynamics from Skoda Kodiak passport data
Donor for experiments served Vokswagen Tiguan. As a consequence, the WAG-WHAR line of motors prescribed for this crossover. Total Czech Parketnik under the hood is set by a diesel "two-room" TDI with potential in 150 "horses" or one of three benzo installations:- 1.4 TSI - 150 hp
- 1.4 TSI - 125 hp
- 2.0 TSI - 180 hp
Crossover Skoda Codiac diesel or gasoline and what is better from the point of view of the speaker - this is a question that worries the potential buyer. Therefore, you must first hold a virtual test. It is expressed in comparison of the passport characteristics:
- The monodiferous 125-strong version is equipped with mechanics and accelerates to "weave" for 10.5 seconds.
- The front-wheel drive 150-strong middling exchanges "hundred" for 9.6 seconds with a six-speed DSG. In the all-wheel drive version, this motor with a robot develops 100 km / h in 9.9 seconds. On the mechanics, a bunch of 4x4 slightly faster - 9.8 s.
- Achievement on the speedometer of the mark "100" after 9.9 s. Provides a drive to the rear and front wheels + diesel 2.0 TDI + sevendia band robot DSG.
- Extract 100 km / h in 8 seconds capable of "two-time" TSI 4x4 + 7-variable robotic set of gear shift.
Dynamics data are decomposed, structuring information on the rod. 200 nm provides 125-strong modifications. At version 150 "horses" - 50 nm more. The most traveled - the unit for DT: 340 nm. In the adjacent volume of gasoline execution (2.0 TSI), 320 nm is laid.
A quick look in booklets allows you to make a conclusion on the theoretical level - the fastest crossover Skoda KodiaQ will be with 2.0 TSI. However, you should not write off the heavy-fuel version. Despite the difference of 30 horses, she has an advantage of 20 nm. This means that the car is clearly not saved on off-road, but on the contrary - it will look more worthy.
Compare the interval of the accessibility of the moment does not make sense. All motors jerk fuel directly into the combustion chamber and are equipped with turbines. So, the nominal torque is available from the bottom and up to 3-4 thousand rpm.
Vugovsky diesel and gasoline or what is better for crossover Skoda codiac in practice
Parcattails under consideration have already purchased a considerable amount. This is evidenced by many reviews of both the quality of the car as a whole and the driving characteristics. Initial concerns associated with insufficient energy modifications are dispelled.
How rude
Many authoritative publications have already performed comparative tests of 1.4 TSI VS 2.0 TDI. Experts were drilled alternately and "Two Divine" TSI and TDI. As far as Skoda codiac gasoline is better or why the two-liter diesel is losing, it is clear from the technical characteristics: the 180-strong benzo version rules the ball. Additional
Only emphasize the laid potential: 
- Fascinating dynamic acceleration with pickup on "Nizakh".
- The optimal fuel consumption (10 liters on the "honeycomb" during operation in urban conditions by 70%).
- Permanent power supply required for sharp overtaking.
Diesel rides worse, but not always. Mixed flow rate - about 7 liters per 100 kilometers of way. It's hard with a two-liter opponent to him, but from his niche he confidently displaces him. Valuation of modification per DT:
- Unhurried trips around the city.
- Farm solders.
- Safe and economical ride on the highway with thoughtful overtook maneuvers.
Performances 1.4 TSI is economical. Consume only 1 liter more diesel modification in a mixed cycle. But, with the pickup, everything is sad. If in urban traffic, you can still move more or less dynamically, then on the highway ahead, they are not easy.
A little about the technical part
New generation of engines The Germans looked off to eat oil. The effect is achieved due to the change in the geometry of the piston rings. According to reviews, the younger models of engines consume about 100-200 grams into the intersavity period. They have become quieter and besides faster heated.
For your information. Previously, the concern used the technology of the weak preload of the rings. This contributed to the decrease in friction, but led to increased oil consumption.
Calcullary
We calculate how much the three-year Skoda Kodiaq content will cost. Suppose that during this time the car will take 100,000 km. At the same time, it will have 6 service test points with different costs. For 2.0 TSI and 2.0 TDI, the price of service is approximately the same. In total, the "service" will take about 110,000 rubles.
It will take more fuel to many more: 450,000 rubles - on high-octane fuel and 308,000 rubles - per DT. Calculation of the task, diesel or gasoline and what is better from the position of the benefit for Skoda Kodiak, we can say the following - the diesel version is more profitable 2.0 TSI for all three parameters:
- Basic price in the top package - 1 949,000 versus 2,014,000 rubles.
- The cost of content is 418,000 against 560,000 rubles.
- Tax costs are less due to the fact that the capacity is on the border in 150 hp
Verdict
The best option for fans of the rapid ultra-dynamic ride will be all-wheel drive modification 2.0 TSI. Availability B.
This codiac of the high speed index is evidence of this. 
The diesel version is lagging behind in the dynamics from the top gasoline performance, but succeeds in the reserve of thrust and economy. It is cheaper not only in terms of elementary price, but also from the point of view of the content both in tax respects and in the policies of everyday expenses. There are no vibrations. By minuses of diesel, it is worthwhile to record the quality of fuel and the complexity of the repair. So that the wasolar does not frozen, you will have to add antigel additives.
It will not be an exaggeration to say that the big SUV from Mlada Boleslav became one of the most anticipated last year's innovations of the Russian market. And not only Russian. Starting from 2014, in each interview at each international auto show, be it a Geneva, Frankfurt or Paris, then Skoda's chef, Josef Kabana, among others, were certainly asked when and what the first large Czech crossover will be. Joseph replied not too eagerly, year after year only the smallest lifting the curtain of the mystery, enveloped the future Skoda Kodiak. Only in the Berlin Premiere in the fall of 2016 Skoda Codiac 2018 finally opened the cards. Visually, Kodiak turned out to be more than attractive, it remained only to find out what it turns out to be in terms of functionality and everyday exploitation.
Configuration and prices
Fuel consumption Skoda Kodiac
To achieve the declared Skoda for coding with a 150-strong 2-liter diesel engine of consumption of 6.1 liters per hundred in a conditionally mixed operation cycle, it was not so easy. Because of its dimensions and decent windshield resistance, Skoda Codiac 2018 in terms of consumption was very sensitive to external factors: the direction of the wind and the aerodynamic shadow of large cars. If we abstract from these factors, as well as from a manic economical driving manner, then the real average consumption in the mixed cycle in most cases will be from 7.2 to 7.8 liters per 100 km - is not so bad for a large seven SUV.
Reliability and resource of the car
Among motorists still there is an opinion that the weak side of Skoda, as well as all VW Group cars, remains a notorized DSG gearbox. Similar to this is really the mediocre reliability of the first generation of DSG robots. At one time, Volkswagen hurried to put on the advanced conveyor, but still raw dual-clutch gearbox, working without breaking the stream of power. As a result, the VW Group brands pay for it so far. And although in the modern generation DSG, all childhood diseases have long been cured and have no relation to KodiaQ, to get rid of this brand oh, how difficult. As they say, "the spoons were found, but the precipitate remained." One way or another, we did not specifically overheat the task for the codiac, but in the process of usual, and at times and very severe off-road exploitation for 4,600 km did not notice any special problems with DSG.
Skoda Codiac Specifications 2018
Engine| Engine | 1.4 / 90 kW (125 hp) / 4x2 / MCPP | 1.4 / 110 kW (150 hp) / 4x2 / automatic | 1.4 / 110 kW (150 hp) / 4x4 / Automatic | 2.0 / 110 kW (150 hp) / 4x4 / Automatic | 2.0 / 132 kW (180 hp) / 4x4 / Automatic |
| The number of cylinders / working volume, cm 3 | 4/1395 | 4/1395 | 4/1395 | 4/1968 | 4/1984 |
| Max. Power, kW / rpm / min. | 92/5000-6000 | 110/5000-6000 | 110/5000–6000 | 110/3500–4000 | 132/3900–6000 |
| Max. Torque, N · m / rpm. | 200/1400-4000 | 250/1500-3500 | 250/1500–3500 | 340/1750–3000 | 320/1400–3940 |
| Fuel | Gasoline with octane number of at least 95 | Gasoline with octane number of at least 95 | Diesel fuel | Gasoline with octane number of at least 95 |
| Body | |
| A type | 5/7-seater, 5-door, wagon |
| Aerodynamic Resistance Coefficient, C W | 0,323-0,334 (0.324-0.341) depending on the engine |
| Chassis | |
| Front axle | McPherson racks with lower triangular transverse levers and transverse stability stabilizer |
| Rear axle | Multi-line with one longitudinal and three transverse levers and transverse stability stabilizer |
| Brake system | Hydraulic, with two contours diagonally, with a vacuum amplifier and the DUAL RATE system |
| - front brake mechanisms | Disk with internal cooling and single-surface floating caliper |
| - rear brake mechanisms | Disk |
| Steering | Rush, with an electromechanical amplifier |
| Disks | 7,0JX17 " |
| Tires | 215/65 R17 |
| dimensions | |
| Length / width, mm | 4697/1882 |
| Height, mm. | 1676 (1673) |
| Wheel base, mm | 2791 |
| Pitch front / rear wheels, mm | 1586/1576 |
| Road clearance, mm | 187 (188) |
| Salon dimensions | |
| The width of the front / rear of the cabin, mm | 1527/1510 (1527/1511/1270) |
| Height to ceiling in front / rear, mm | 1020/1014 (1020/1015/905) |
| with raised / folded rear seat backs | 720/2065 (270/2005) |
| Volume of luggage compartment | |
| with raised / folded rear seat backs, l. | 635/1980 |
Convenience and Ergonomics Skoda Codiac Skoda 2018
With the diversity of the modern automotive market, ergonomics every year becomes an increasingly significant factor determining the choice of the car. And the point here comes down not only and not so much by the time of adaptation by the wheel, how much the controls are clear how intuitively understandable and how deeply your unity with the car becomes ultimately. If you evaluate ergonomics on a 5-point scale, Skoda Kodiak quite deserves an estimate from 4 to 4+. Ergonomics, maybe not the best on the market, but close to it. Explicit ergonomic miscalculations, who sin some European and Japanese classmates, there is no.
The decoration of the cabin does not look a futuristic, but ergonomics at the height. The space over the central tunnel is built as ergonomically as possible.
Another very successful find is a double "glove".
The umbrella in the door panel is one of the options Skodovskaya Simply Clever.
Capacity
Although a pure geometrically Skoda Kodiac is only a few centimeters longer than Skoda Octavia, in these dimensions, the boar was not just managed to fit a full-fledged seven crossover, but also made it one of the most spacious family SUV. Length of the cabin - 1793 mm, the width at the level of the elbows is 1527 mm in front and 1510 mm at the rear. Height, respectively, - 1020 and 1014 mm. To facilitate access to the third row, the rear sofa is shifted forward 18 cm and provides for the possibility of transformation in parts 60:40. In many respects, thanks to this, Skoda Kodiak can also boast one of the largest trunk in the class, the volume of which, depending on the location of the seats, varies in the range from 635 to 1980 l. The maximum loading size of the lengths in the version with the folding back of the front seat is 2.8 m. However, despite all the wonders of the transformation and the volume of the salon, even kodiaq and refers to the number of those cars that "inside seem more than outside," you should pay Report: The third row will really be comfortable only to children up to 10-12 years old.
The seats of the second row move forward 180 mm to facilitate access to the "gallery". It is not necessary to overestimate the scope of the third row, but children are very comfortable there.
If in what Skoda Codiac 2018 and give unambiguous odds to competitors, so it is in the practicality and set of "mechanical" comfort options. In total, in the KodiaQ design, more than 30 solutions from the Simply Clever series are provided: from retractable protective screens on the edges of the doors to 230 volt sockets in the cabin. It is noteworthy that most Skodovskiy Simply Clever options for other car brands are not available even as options.
The circular review system significantly facilitates maneuvering.
Energower facilitating the life of the driver with systems of auxiliary electronics, maybe not at the same top level in the SUV class, but also close to this: everything that is necessary, from adaptive cruise control to emergency braking systems, in equipping or in the KodiaQ option list . Outcome What do we have at the exit? Does the market have decent competitors, exploitfully superior codes for each of the above parameters separately? Of course! With the exception, except that the latter ... But here is that the combination of all these factors together taken, together with the cost of the car, the codiac is undoubtedly one of the favorites and potential bestsellers of its segment. No wonder that the fans of the brand were waiting for him so much years!
I started it basically in order to check the testimony of the BC -Kak of his figure refers to reality) turned out to be Skoda set it up decently. Before each refueling, I watched the BC testimony from the moment of refueling, after refueling, compared the numbers on the check and mileage. 1 was one to one, 1 time BC showed at 0.3 liters larger and all the remaining-BCs dumbed consumption by 0.3 liters from the actual. Refueling on different 3 refills, but only BP. Just to the full tank before the cutoff. After cut-off did not draw. I think it was approximately equally poured.
General results for a couple of months.
And in refueling, respectively
By addiction 1 passenger-plus 0.5 Consumption)
And on the current experience
Spassazhi route from 7 to 9 (from ride style)
City 8.5-12 (from traffic jams)
Short distances 5-15 km with constant traffic jams - 12-15 liters / km
Total main-BC is not in consumption
About pleasant, there is that in our country there are steadily growing independence from what it would not be))
I went about a third of the track, a third of the city without traffic jams, a third of the plugs. But this is exactly)
Approximately true
Mileage: 12000 km
www.drive2.ru/l/492144704201163148/
Just drove 2500 km. on on tracks, cities, traffic jams, rough terrain. Who will figure it out how much will the average gasoline consumption on a 2-liter, turbocharged (+ dsg) Codiac 180 hp?
As far as I remember, at the same Skoda Yeti 1.6 l. Similar average consumption was 10.5 liters per 100km.
We look at the computer reading:
Here, for the period where there was more the tracks and less than the city.
In general, when driving, it is possible to achieve consumption in normal speed. 7.9 liters. per 100 km. . Here I am so I think that consumption is very different. Although according to passport data generally written unreal 7.4 l / 100km. Although if a long time to go and clearly with the optimal speed, everything can be :-)
And these results are of course at a speed on the highway at 130-150 km / h on short segments. Consumption immediately jumps.
I was still surprised where 98 gasoline was disappeared in Lukoil and why to find 100 gasoline was so difficult. On most refills 92 and 95. By the way, gasoline is more expensive than the ruble for three than we have in Stary Oskol. Earn on the influx of holidaymakers or something.
Comrade was driving with me on the daster on Gaza - it says for the last month the price of gas jumped by 40% - it is shocked.
And here is a man diesel:
